Warning! FCC Wants To Be Big Brother

As if we don't already have enough bad news floating around today, here comes more! This one is BIG people! This story MUST GO VIRAL! I would encourage EVERY READER HERE TO POST, BLOG, TWEET, EMAIL ETC. this story to EVERYONE YOU KNOW!

As "Missy 8's" so accurately stated over at Big Government:

Missy8s 127p · 51 minutes ago
Can anyone say "state run media", this action is the most vile constitutional violation of the first amendment in the history of the republic.

This is also upsetting to me personally because such a breach of our Constitutional free speech rights might occur on my birthday - November 30th!!

Please, PLEASE SEND THIS POST TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW! SPREAD THE WORD!

Christine

*******

Big Government.com: November 30th Could Be the Day the Government Seizes Control of the Internet

November 30th Could Be the Day the Government Seizes Control of the Internet
by Seton Motley

November 30th, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) could potentially engage in one of the largest federal power grabs we have ever seen.

After two years of this Presidential Administration and this Congress, that is saying an awful lot about an awful lot.

And what’s worse, the FCC would be doing it without Congress weighing in. At the FCC’s November meeting – note the coincidental date of choice, AFTER the impending election – three unelected bureaucrats (of five) could simply vote themselves rulers of 1/6th of our entire economy – the information and technology sector.

Meaning the Internet that you currently enjoy – that has been a marvel of economic and information innovation and success – will be subject to vast new governmental regulations. You didn’t elect these people – but they are on the verge of electing themselves Internet overlords.

The Internet is the future – and increasingly the present – of news and information delivery. With each passing day, we move a little further away from the old media models – print, broadcast and cable television, radio – and towards an all-Web world. Eventually, most or all of the news and information we get – written, and spoken into microphones and cameras – will be on and for the Internet.

And we are on the verge of having this new world – the all-encompassing future of First Amendment free speech in America – swallowed up by three unelected D.C. bureaucrats and their Commission.


This is one of the most important battles ever waged in Washington – and precious little is known about it outside the Beltway.

What we are talking about is Internet reclassification. What that means is the FCC – which by its own admission doesn’t have authority over the Web – would just vote itself said authority. By reclassifying the Internet – so that it would be subject to the same rules as landline telephones.

The FCC has long had tremendous power over landline telephones, which is why there has been so much incredible innovation with them these last 70+ years. (Note: tremendous sarcasm here.)

The FCC has no power over the Internet because the FCC doesn’t have power over anything until Congress writes a law saying they do. And Congress has never done this for the FCC with the Internet.

It’s not just me saying this. 299 members of Congress have said so – a large bipartisan majority. More than 150 organizations, state legislators and bloggers have said so. So have seventeen minority groups – that are usually almost always in Democrat lockstep.

So have many additional normally Democrat paragons, including several large unions: AFL-CIO, Communications Workers of America (CWA),International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW); several racial grievance groups: League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), Minority Media and Telecom Council (MMTC), National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Urban League; and an anti-free market environmentalist group: the Sierra Club.

So too has the unanimous D.C. Circuit Court – led by a Democrat Bill Clinton-appointee – ruling in April in the Comcast-BitTorrent case that the FCC doesn’t have the authority to regulate the Internet.

Most importantly, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski has himself said so. In an interview last week with the Washington Post, the Chairman readily acknowledged “(W)e have a Communications Act that wasn’t written for broadband.”

Chairman Genachowski is referring to the 1996 Telecommunications Act, the last time Congress addressed communications policy and the authorities the FCC has there over. Broadband Internet for all intents and purposes didn’t yet even exist.

The remedy to all of this is crystal clear. Congress should do what it’s supposed to do – write a law that defines and details the FCC’s role (or lack thereof) in regulating the Internet.

And the FCC should do what it’s supposed to do – unless and until Congress acts, NOTHING.

What the FCC must NOT do is unilaterally vote itself vast new powers under the cover of bureaucratic, post-election darkness.

Hat Tip:

Big Government

One Trashy Event

When certain events are reported incorrectly by the media of mass deception, one has to wonder whether or not such errors were simply due to laziness on the part of the organization. Or, was it more likely done because of someones stupid attempt at spreading pro-progressive/liberal/Marxist/pro-union bosses/Communist/Socialist/Global warming propaganda? Nice Deb reports: When Is C-Span Going To Apologize For Using An 8/28 Crowd Shot For Its One Nation Promo?

Wow! Glenn Beck should have a field day on both his radio and T.V. shows. He will most likely do a lengthy report on the event and reveal to the public the very low turnout of the One Communist Nation Rally in Washington, D.C. which was held this past Saturday. How ironic it is to see the trash return to the mall - just like it did during the Obama inauguration.

Neil, over at Eternity Matters has a great roundup posted at his blog, including a photo morph of the difference between the crowd that showed up at Glenn Beck's 8/28 Rally and the sparse crowd that was mostly bussed in by union leaders to attend the One Socialist Nation litter fest. [H/T Eternity Matters for still pic - I couldn't get the "morphing" to work here.]

I don't get it. Aren't these people supposed to be the "green" crowd? Ironic Surrealism has the photos to show how trashy the event was. If these people are so worried about the planet, then why do they throw their trash around our nation's capital? Are they so brazen that they think they are too "elite" to pick up after themselves and so just leave it there for someone else to discard? Says a lot about their character - or, more accurately - their lack of character, decency and respect - as it were.

Oh my...while viewing the photos of the trash event, be sure to read the comments over at Ironic Surrealism!

Even though the grounds were so disrespectfully trashed, what was even worse in my mind were all of the anti-American trashy messages given at that garbage fest!

Hat Tips:

Nice Deb

Eternity Matters

Ironic Surrealism

*******

More blog posts and photos:

New Zeal: Mall Post Barackalyptic Wasteland

The Blaze: Politics
‘One Nation’ Crowd Didn’t Exactly Leave the Mall (or World War II Memorial) Spotless

Obama's Narcissism & Islamic Roots Are a Spiritual Problem

Dr Kates View blog has an excellent post up entitled, The Narcissist Cornered

Excerpt:

Obama’s lack of affection and affinity will increase:

The narcissist’s natural affinity with the criminal – his lack of empathy and compassion, his deficient social skills, his disregard for social laws and morals – now erupts and blossoms. He becomes a full fledged antisocial (sociopath or psychopath). He ignores the wishes and needs of others, he breaks the law, he violates all rights – natural and legal, he hold people in contempt and disdain, he derides society and its codes, he punishes the ignorant ingrates – that, to his mind, drove him to this state – by acting criminally and by jeopardizing their safety, lives, or property (emphasis added)

This is our experience, too: Obama has reacted to Americans’ concerns by appointing more and more individuals antithetical to our values, Constitution, and government; by moving to socialize more sectors of our society; by openly breaking the law, and by taking other actions that penalize individuals, whole classes of society, and our Nation.

Narcissists feel entitled to money, power, and honours incommensurate with their accomplishments or toil. The world, or God, or the nation, or society, or their families, co-workers, employers, even neighbours owe them a trouble-free, exalted, and luxurious existence. They are rudely shocked when they are penalized for their misconduct or when their fantasies remain just that.

Read it all HERE.

The comments and links provided are a must read too!

Here is a copy of my comment:

This is an excellent post! It captures what millions of Americans are thinking, feeling, and worrying about regarding Obama the narcissist and his evil cohorts.

Hope you don't mind if I add one thing, however. All of Obama's obvious problems - mental, emotional, social, political, etc. - which have been so eloquently listed in the original post here, as well as within many of the comments and links provided - have one thing in common. They are rooted in the fact that he (and all of the radical leftist progressives who agree, follow, and support him) and they have a severe spiritual problem.

The fact that Islam has its roots in paganism, shows us how well acceptance of its radical ideals fit in with the ideology of Marxism.

While participating in the ongoing discussion at Sarah Palin's FaceBook page I noticed the horror that most commentators have been sharing there. They wonder how any sane American could even consider the ludicrous idea of building a mosque at Ground Zero. I also noticed that several lefties wrote "we all worship the same God." I tried to educate them with a link to my blogpost so that they could read some facts and see how wrong they are. I also included links to an Australian Christian scholar's blog who wrote two excellent blog posts that the "we all worship the same God" myth is absolutely not true - and why it logically can't be true!

[See Bill Muehlenberg's Culture Watch blog and these two posts:
Culture Watch Blog: No, We Do Not Worship the Same God
Culture Watch Blog: What to Make of Allah ]

There is no way one can equate our Judeo-Christian God with the false pagan moon-god they label as "allah." If you are interested in reading these posts, please visit Talk Wisdom: Why Muslims Don't Worship the Same God as Christians. I hope that after reading these essays that you will spread this information far and wide in order to dispel that myth which is being spread by people are are, quite frankly, ignorant about the subject.

The fact is, Obama's narcissism and terrible political ideology is rooted within himself as a spiritual problem. Think of it as a kind of spiritual oblivion. The type of mindset that Obama possesses is totally anathema to the God of the Bible and the Judeo-Christian roots upon which our Founders built our Constitutional Republic. The United States of America, and Her Founding Documents were built upon Judeo-Christian morals, laws, and values. The lack of recognition of these facts and the spiritual deception that Obama and his ilk are under is the main reason why he and his cohorts are wreaking havoc upon this nation.

I want to know - when will we reach the point where enough is enough? We must stand up against this radical takeover of America and oust the perpetrators!

I continue to pray each day that this national nightmare will end soon. What Obama and his evil cohorts are doing to America is OUTRIGHT CRIMINAL and they all belong in jail because they are traitors to this nation!

Hat Tip:

Dr Kates View

*******

Update: A new comment over at DrKatesView led me to a comprehensive post over at Atlas Shrugs: Sharia (Islamic) Law in New Jersey Court: Muslim husband rapes, beats, sexually abuses wife, judge sees no sexual assault because Islam forbids wives to refuse sex.

This emphasizes even more why Muslim "laws" don't belong here in America...EVER!!!!

Excerpt:

On a lengthy note bene in the form of a short comparative law analysis: it should be stressed that this is another classic example where Islam/Shariah departs radically from the Judeo Christian tradition. Now, I cannot speak directly to Catholic canon on this subject or Christian Ecclesiastical law (although we do know that English common law, carried to the US, has long had a spousal rape exception—that is, husbands cannot be charged with raping their wives), but at least the Judeo portion of the Judeo Christian tradition is absolutely clear.



According to Jewish law, any form of coerced sexual relations between married couples is absolutely forbidden. (Talmud Bavli, Eruvin 100b: Rami b. Hama citing R. Assi further ruled: “A man is forbidden to compel his wife to the [marital] obligation, since it is said in Scripture: ‘Without consent the soul is not good; and he that hurries with his feet sins’” (Prov. 19:2). (Ba’ailei ha-Nefesh, Sha’ar ha-Kedushah; Code of Jewish Law, Hil. De’ot 5:4; Even ha-Ezer 25:2.)



Thus, even if the wife is not forced outright, as long as she is not amenable to intercourse, sexual relations are prohibited. (From authoritative Ashkenazi ruling on the Code of Jewish Law: Magen Avraham, Orah Hayyim 240, no. 7; from the leading Jewish mystical source, Kabbalah, Zohar, Bereshit 49b, 148b, Va-yikra 225b.) The greatest Jewish legal authority, the Sephardic Maimonides (known by his Hebrew acronym to Jews as the Rambam), rules, “[Her husband] should not coerce her [to have relations] when she does not desire to do so. Rather, [they should engage in intercourse only] when there is mutual desire and pleasure.” (Maimonides’ Code of Jewish Law, the Mishne Torah, Hil. Ishut [Laws of Women] 15:17.) Further, even if the wife is ambivalent about her desire, relations are forbidden. (Masekhet Kallah Rabbati 1:11; Tur, Orah Hayyim 240 and Even ha-Ezer 25.) Keep in mind that Maimonides is from the 11th-12th centuries and even the most recent of these (Code of the Jewish Law) is from the 15th-16th centuries. Old law is not necessarily bad law and “progressive law” is not necessarily good law. Shariah is not bad because it is old. It is bad because it is bad.


[An important digression: I make this latter point about old vs. new law because we often hear the criticism of Shariah that it is bad and primitive because it is “Medieval law” as if that is enough to condemn it. But by implication, the person who makes this criticism, is in effect embracing the “progressivist” or Hegelian teaching that Time/History is the one transcendence that saves us from the nihilism of relativism (all morals are relative except that a new moral is better than an old one), which allows the Leftist/Elites to clamor on about “progress” and the latest version of this, “hope and CHANGE”. And, if you give it a half-second’s worth of thought, you’ll realize why the progressivism of the Elite is tyranny [hint: there are no transcendent boundaries only time as a measure of progress]. It also impacts our constitutional jurisprudence. If old is bad simply, then granting the Supreme Court the authority (to which Marbury v Madison effectively opened the door) to “re-interpret” [read: re-write or amend by judicial fiat] the Constitution to mirror the “progress” and “change” in society must be a good thing. That kind of hollows out the originalist/conservative view of the Constitution, no?]

Is Obama A Marxist? Answer: YES!

While attempting to answer several questions from Kevin in the blog post comment thread here, I thought that I would bring the conversation to a new blog post. Why? For several reasons. I think that it is extremely important for conservatives to continually educate the public, via blogs, books, videos, etc. about the true nature of Obama. This is a very important issue.

Kevin wrote:

Hi Christine,
Arab is not recognized as a race ( but don't believe me, go ahead and look it up--Wikipedia does a good job at explaining Arab). It is an ethnicity, just like 'Irish' is not a race but an ethnic group. For example, saying someone is 50% Irish is not necessarily saying they are 50% white (or whatever race you want to pick). I still don't understand the '6.25% African Negro from his father's side.' I think the author of this statement is confusing race with ethnicity, unless there is another racial mixture of his African grandparents or great grandparents. This whole percentage thing is rather odd as well, if you ask me. What is the point? If it is to point out that he is different and 'other,' then we have to ask why it is being pointed out.

In the same comment thread, Kevin also wrote:

And again I ask--what is Marxist about Obama and his policies? I would love to see some parallels to other Marxist regimes and what our own President is doing. Did you see that article at the CNN website that was from the President of the Socialist USA party? He said that Obama is no such thing. Interesting...

My first inclination was to reply, what ISN'T Marxist about Obama and his policies!!?? It is so clear to anyone paying any attention to what is going on in the White House and Congress, it seems to me that the question doesn't even need to be asked! However, since Kevin did ask (several times) for a reply from me, I thought that it would be best to be thorough and present as much evidence as possible. [Note: Do not miss the videos over at Investigating Obama. A man who KNEW Obama in his younger years reveals much evidence that Obama was, and still is a Marxist. In fact, he goes so far as to claim that Obama is a revolutionary Marxist activist!



My reply:

Kevin,

I think that the question is not "why is it being pointed out," but why has it been purposely hidden? A blogging friend of mine once wrote that he thinks Obama (and all of his cohorts) want to hide his Muslim roots.

A while back, Glenn Beck had a segment on his show about all of the radial socialists, Marxists, Communists, and Maoists who influenced Obama throughout his entire life. He did a quick recap of Obama's life from childhood to adulthood. What I found odd was that Beck left out Obama Jr's. adoption by Lolo Soetoro, the move to Indonesia, and the fact that Obama was taught Muslim practices during his early childhood schooling there. Why did Beck leave that out? Perhaps because of a time constraint. But I think that it had a lot to do with not revealing to the public Obama's Muslim schooling and roots. The Fox News Channel is 17% owned by Saudis - and keeping such information from the public might be deemed important to them.

In another comment, you wanted me to tell you why I think that Obama is a Marxist. One telling sign is that he has been surrounded by, and influenced by them his entire life! But don't just take my word for it. You can read :

1. Investigating Obama: Barack Obama Argued Strict Revolutionary Marxism to John C. Drew at Occidental College.

2. Sean Hannity's new book - Conservative Victory - Defeating Obama's Radical Agenda. [Only $10.35 at Walmart or $8.00 at Amazon.] Sean labels Obama as a socialist. Just a different degree of the Marxist, Communist brand.

3. Scroll down at the blog site when you click on the link below and read the The Obama File sidebar links on the right of the page. A plethora of information about Obama's Marxism.

4. Watch former Glenn Beck Program shows online. He points out how many of Obama czars and staff are Marxist or downright Communists!

Kevin, the majority of Americans are now on to Obama, his lies, and all of his terrible schemes. He will become a lame duck after the November 2010 elections and hopefully his disastrous bills will all be repealed. He will be a one term president OTP and our nation will be back to having a sane leader again in 2012 (if not sooner because hopefully, one of the lawsuits pointing out his obvious ineligibility might get a hearing before then).

I would also like to recommend reading:

Daily Thought Pad: Wall Street Journal Sizes Up Obama - They've Got Him Figured Out.

Hat Tips to all links.

*******

Update:

Also see:

American Crisis: Who is Barack Obama? The scariest list of facts about President Obama you've ever seen... The President who HATES America.

*******

Unchecked Power Yielded by Megalomaniacs

Wow! The following article is certainly chilling... very chilling in fact! What makes it all the more important to read and pay attention to is the fact that the writer admits to being a recovering liberal!

The Shock of Barack
posted by null at American Thinker - 11 hours ago
I've been feeling funky since Black Sunday, the day of the health care debacle. As a therapist, I'm usually able to identify my feelings. But this one had left me stumped.


Excerpts:

It took a conversation with a conservative friend, Nancy, for me to pinpoint the feeling. Nancy told me that a Jewish co-worker, a staunch Obama supporter, was feeling "shell-shocked" by Obama's vilifying Israel.


Bingo. That's what it is: stunned, shell-shocked, traumatized.

[T]rauma means witnessing something that humans are not designed to see, a horror that is more than the self can absorb. The brutality of war, a gruesome crime scene, the sudden death of a loved one. Or the evil that unfolds through unchecked power yielded by megalomaniacs.

For me, trauma was that cloudless November day, years ago, when I exited an Oakland restaurant at noon and soon thereafter, lay prone on the concrete, bloody and broken.


Just moments before, I had looked into the eyes of a man who didn't know that I was human, or who knew but didn't care. I saw something sinister in him, but I ignored my gut. I was still steeped in liberal political correctness and didn't want to appear racially insensitive.


When I see what Obama is doing to this country, how he is treating its citizens, I'm reminded of the man who mugged me. I think that both are constitutionally incapable of seeing our humanity. And each day that Obama is in office, he communicates this same deadly message to the masses -- that opponents are not human.


This would explain the burgeoning of hate and even violence towards those who deign to disagree. And why Tea Party members and conservatives are being targeted, as well as entire countries like Israel.


And this would illuminate why Obama is unfazed while the economy crashes. And why he cavalierly demonizes Israel, putting millions of Israelis at risk. And it explains why Obama mocks conservatives who are legitimately worried about this administration's violating fundamental rights.



But how could Obama see us? Did anyone in his childhood ever see him?

Read it all here.

She concludes:

From what I have seen this last year, Obama shows no ability to walk in another person's shoes. This would require empathy and sensitivity, traits that are nowhere to be found.


Frankly, every time I see Obama, I catch a glimpse of the man who mugged me.


And that, to me, is the true danger and horror and shock of Barack.

A frequent AT contributor, Robin is a recovering liberal and a psychotherapist in Berkeley.

*******

In my mind, the sentence that ultimately describes all of the corruption, contempt, cheating, lying, bribing, threats, dishonesty, hatred, race-baiting, targeting, betrayal, attacks, abuses, looting of American taxpayers, contempt towards Israel, infliction of Marxism, appeasement of terrorists and rogue nations, and all the rest of the unconstitutional acts that are being wielded upon the American people by this despicable gangster government can be described in the 5 most descriptive words chosen from the article for the title of this post:

Unchecked Power Yielded by Megalomaniacs

Hat Tip:

American Thinker

*******

Also see:

JammieWearingFool
Ed Koch Goes Nuclear on Obama and NY Democrats - Count former New York City Mayor Ed Koch among those who've lost all Hopenchange. Koch laces into Obama following the disgraceful treatment of Benjamin Netan...

The Post & Email
Army LTC faces probable court martial by challenging Obama’s Eligibility - DECORATED ARMY FLIGHT SURGEON REFUSES TO FOLLOW ORDERS UNTIL OBAMA’S ELIGIBILITY IS PROVEN by Sharon Rondeau (Mar. 31, 2010) — A U.S. Army medical doctor a...

A Place to Ask Questions To Get the Right Answers
What Does Obama Truly Want to Accomplish With His Health Care Plan? - By nature, Man is born free and independent. But to live in a state of nature alone is not safe and offers no security. Hence, Man created government for ...

teresamerica
Rove States: "I Didn't See Any Restraint by Democrats When They Were Attacking George W. Bush" - Rove Stated: "Politics is necessarily about differences, there are big differences between parties and big differences on policy" Violence is not the ans...

VotingFemale Speaks!
Desperation of the Socialist Supremacists is so acrid you can smell it like a rotting ‘corps’ - As an example, here is an article by Colbert I. King who lamely attempts to create a juxtaposition between racist protesters in Selma, Alabama, in 1956 and...

More deception by Obama exposed:

Gateway Pundit
Obama’s Drilling Deception- Dems Continue to Restrict New Energy Development - In 2009 Democrats scrapped oil and gas leases in Utah, permanently banned drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), and nixed offshore drilli...

Lame Cherry
Too Obama to be True - This blog was stunned when it read that Barack Hussein Obama was about to do something positive for America in opening oil drilling, but then upon examinat...

A Giant Terrorist Freeing Operation?

Been way to busy lately and haven't had much time to catch up on reading many of my favorite blogs. While reading some of the links in my sidebar, I found a post that stunned me. I hope and pray that it is not true! However, the efforts of ObamaFRAUD and his evil cohorts - who all are trying to fool the American people by simply calling the Fort Hood massacre MURDERING MUSLIM TERRORIST a "gunman" - might finally be explained by the author of the blog, "Lame Cherry."

I admit. Some of that guy's writings are REALLY OUT THERE. However, when the puzzle pieces fit - one must pay closer attention.

I just finished reading the following post:

The Greg Craig Blood Trail

If even just some of what Mr. Lame Cherry says is true, then I think it helps explain why Obama and Holder are trying to go against the majority of American people (especially those who lost loved ones on 9/11) who think that military tribunals would be the proper venue to try and convict the terrorists.

The following is most of the post:

If you want to understand what has been going in the Obama den of iniquity, a good place to start is the cannibalized Greg Craig who was White House Counsel. Mr. Craig is likely the first Obama supporter assassinated by the inner circle who told him to march out on Gitmo and then blamed him for the will of the American people in they didn't want terrorists stuck in their communities when Gitmo closed, because just like New York they are finding it is expensive and now they are targets for terror attacks.

What is interesting about Greg Craig is there appears a great deal of intrigue on the inside in Rahm Emmanuel shafted him from behind. This was signed off on by Val-erie Jarrett, who was knifing Anita Dunn, who had that picture of David Axelrod and her doing pillow talk at a White House Press Conference.

Dunn's husband then to appease him for his wife being pillowed by Axelrod, was given the White House Counsel job for doing such a bang up job in getting Judge Carter to drop the Birther suit after Robert Bauer had Carter hire an employee from his law firm to writer Carter's excuse for dropping the Birther issue.
So intrigue is the smoldering fire of the Obama passion clique.

I am about to advance an exclusive that is exclusive to here, but will build the analogy in analogies or something like that.

We know that Barack Obama has been dealing with Persians, counterfeiters, Khadaffi, Palestinian terrorists in gaining funds from them, and in promising them great gobs of Jewish land.

We know that for Persian support Mr. Obama traded away eastern Europe.

We know that for "nothing" Barack Obama rewarded Syria with all kinds of financial and diplomatic goodies. (Syria has a heavy hand in the Bekaah Valley counterfeiting schemes which channelled huge amounts into Obama's 2008 campaign coffers.)

We know that Mr. Auchi, Saddam Hussein's bagman financed Obama's Senate campaign and purchased for him his mansion in Chicago.

We know that Mr. Obama as a student was royally treated by the Pakistani elite families in their giving a partridge hunt in his honor.

We know now from the deathly silence of Mr. Obama on his Twitter Revolution in Iran, that it was all a quid pro quo for the Persians to round up freedom loving Iranians for execution.

We know that Mr. Obama leaked the information which President Sarkozy of France was about to make public on the Persian nuclear weapons factory as a deal with Russia and the Islamocommunists.

We know that Mr. Obama is in an all out war against Jewish right wing settlers in denying them homes in Jerusalem and the Israeli state.

There seems to be a pattern in this does it not?

Does not Mr. Obama seem to be a merchant of sorts? A conduit of business where money flows to him from terror states and the people who end up suffering are freedom loving people in Iran, the Israeli state and America.

Now in noticing that pattern, let us return to Greg Craig, and his chief responsibility was to end questioning of terrorists and to close Gitmo within one year's time.
Mr. Craig reached a stonewall of non American support and was crucified for it quickly.

Ask yourself though why is it that Mr. Obama does not want terrorists, along with Rahm Emanuel and Val-erie Jarret, being questioned.
Just what is it in Jamie Gorelick walls of separation which under Bill Clinton brought about the 9 11 attacks, that the terrorists then were being coddled by the US leftist government?

Do you not see the pattern here, that the terrorists have information which Mr. Obama for his benefactors is attempting to keep from being discovered.

Does it not also in logical deduction assume that if the European axis which makes great deals of money from the criminal mafia of the Middle East and Muslim oil, with these same Islamic terrorists, would be expecting to be paid back for all their financial and terror support for Mr. Obama to get into the White House.

Notice there were not any major terror events aimed at Obama policy when he was killing bushels of "bad" terrorists for his good terror friends.

Let us progress with that understanding that Mr. Obama in not completing his paid for promise in closing Gitmo, just might be getting some threats in being exposed from the Ashkenaz of Europe who Mr. Emmanuel is one of and from terrorists who desire their comrades free by January 2010.

Look who is running the terror show in Eric Holder who released FALN terrorists and got a pardon for Saddam money launderer Marc Rich.
Eric Holder for Bearick Bowbama is now running the New York terror trials to attack the CIA, DOD and the Bush family who were protecting America from this same axis attack.

Mr. Holder announces he is seeking the death penalty, but the problem is federal law states that people "tortured" can not be tried in court and must be released.

Does this not all now seem more and more that in quid pro quo, Barack Hussein Obama is following orders to close Gitmo to set numerous Muslim terrorists free back to the people who funded his campaign.

Is not this a giant terrorist freeing operation which Greg Craig failed at, and now has Robert Bauer running to devastate with Eric Holder American security and to release numbers of terrorists as Mr. Obama was hired to do.

That is the exclusive in this to be studied as there is a definite pattern in the Lockerbie terrorist was released with Barack Obama's blessing to Khadaffi in exchange for oil contracts.

The Gitmo terrorists are the same commodities in this international criminal market and it is past time to assess memos, internal workings and just what the "behind the scenes" promises have been from Barack Obama since 2008 to terrorists concerning the Gitmo terrorists.

What exactly was the discourse concerning the Gitmo terrorists as it seems quite expensive as Mr. Obama's first act was releasing Xianxang terrorists at one million dollars a head to settle them island resorts.
If one needs a reminder in this exclusive, Xianxang has exploded for communist China as a revolution pit during this same exchange period.

That all looks like the Gitmo terrorists are an expensive commodity in buying favor and securing antagonisms.

To put it plainly, what Ollie North was railed against with Richard Secord in Iran Contra, Mr. Obama appears on an international mafia scale to be dealing in the human terrorist trade. Iran Contra is a grain of sand compared to the criminal scandal of what is being conducted by the Obama administration universe of crime.

No one has put this together yet or broken the immense story of Obama criminality. This is not impeachable in scope but treasonous in fruition by Barack Obama. He has been selling terrorists and trading terrorists for personal gain and his policies.

The spore all points to this criminal operation by Barack Hussein Obama and his inner clique. Nancy Pelosi in ranting about the CIA lying to her is part of this cover up of what Obama has been conducting.

These indeed are all high crimes against the United States and against Persian Patriots to Jewish Settlers.

Mr. Obama has been caught in trading terrorists in Libya and rewarding Syria for "nothing". He is bartering terrorists around the world. That is what closing Gitmo is about as Middle Eastern and European cartels paid Mr. Obama to free their terrorists.

The blood trail all is a spore which says Obama is the roaring lion seeking who he may devour. It is past time that the press, Justice Department, public and Congress start doing their jobs and end the terror traffic being conducted by Barack Obama.

CHILLING....ABSOLUTELY CHILLING PEOPLE!!

Now, before "Mike Rucker" or "John" or "GMPilot" or any additional liberal-bent "anonymouses" come along and excoriate me for posting this, I must admit that the theory put forth here must be listed under the "Talk Wisdom Reports - You Decide" category of posts.

Some readers may deem it all just another conspiracy theory - on steroids. I would certainly breathe a big sigh of relief if that turns out to be true.

However, some readers may experience a "light bulb" revealing moment in their minds and now see how the array of puzzling terrorism decisions being made by Obama and Holder horribly and creepily "fit" when the secret dealings mentioned in the post are exposed.

Personally, I have no idea whether or not what Mr. Lame Cherry professes in his essay is true. But if it is true, America is in unimaginable danger at the hands of a bogus POTUS and his evil partners in crime.

If true...what awful traitors they are!

If true...can you say TREASON, anyone?

Hat Tip:

Lame Cherry


*******
Please feel free to share your thoughts. I realize that emotions will probably run high on this one. Agree or disagree but please no personal attacks and try to keep the conversation civil.
Thanks,
Christine

One Of My Worst Fears [Added Links]

Ever since the horrendous terrorist attack that occurred on U.S. soil on 9/11/01 by radical Islamic terrorists, one of my worst fears has been infiltration of terrorist individuals (or cells) here in the United States. Why should we ever believe that they aren't already here? They have been for some time.

Yesterday was a shock beyond belief. It was the worst terrorist attack perpetrated against our military on a military base here in the United States. I could not sleep last night! I kept waking up and turning on the T.V. for more news about the murderer.

Sometimes, I have found that it is better for other people to give details rather than express my own thoughts and worries on the matter. The following two links are not the usual politically correct spin that you will most likely hear on the MSM news broadcasts. At least Fox News has been more up front about the possible motive. Bill Hemmer reported that the shooter yelled "Allah Akbar" before gunning down 44 people. Personally, I think that the details coming forward now show that the man was a radical Islamic terrorist. Whether he was radicalized after being in the army (or before 9/11) or after is what might need to be investigated.

The NEIN Blog: ENEMIES WITHIN

Excerpt:

6 November 2009: The shooting attack at Ft. Hood Thursday by a Muslim soldier is anything but an isolated incident. It is the latest in a series of attacks by Muslim soldiers who have violated their oath to protect and defend this country, instead placing their allegiance in the religion, culture and political system known as Islam. Even if it is ultimately determined that Nidal Malik HASAN was the sole perpetrator in this mass murder, there are co-conspirators.

The co-conspirators are each and every politician, policymaker and pundit who has force-fed the American people the lie that Islam “is a religion of peace” or is a “religion hijacked. Whether it is for the shallow purposes of political expediency, political correctness or just plain naiveté, those who espouse and advance this perilous view have their share of innocent blood on their hands.

The latest murderous rampage should be sufficient to illustrate that Islam is totally incompatible with freedom, democracy and Western culture. Faced with the choice between upholding their oath to the United States and advancing Islam by any means possible, it will always be the latter. As soon as people begin to understand and accept this concept, we can better secure our homeland and lower the potential body count of innocent men, women and children.

There are some who contend - with a straight face, no less - that “Post Traumatic Stress Disorder” (PTSD) might be the cause for HASAN’s murder spree. The only “stressors” in this case would result from attempting to reconcile the irreconcilable.

If the mass murder at Ft. Hood yesterday is not convincing enough, how about the March 23, 2003 grenade attack by Muslim Sgt. Hasan Karim Akbar that killed Army Captain Christopher Seifert and Air Force Major Gregory Stone and wounded 14 others? Or the June 1st, 2009 shooting attack at the Little Rock recruiting center by 23 year-old Muslim Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, who killed two officers?

Of course, the treachery is not just limited to murder. While serving as a naval signalman on board the USS Benfoldin the months following the attack on the USS Cole, Hassan Abujihaad (a/k/a Paul R. Hall) actively provided Islamic terrorists with sensitive information about the location of Navy ships and their weaknesses. He also discussed sniper attacks on military personnel and attacks on U.S. military recruitment sites with Muslim terrorists as well. For his crimes, Abujihaad is currently serving a ten-(10) year sentence.

There is also U.S. Army captain James “Yousef” LEE, the former Muslim chaplain charged with espionage while serving at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. YEE was arrested at a U.S. airport on charges of espionage after he was caught in possession of detailed maps of the detention facility along with other classified materials. In addition to YEE, two other Islamic Arabic translators stationed at Guantanamo were convicted of unauthorized possession of classified documents.

Ultimately, the U.S. Army opted not to proceed with the espionage charges against YEE due to national security concerns arising from the evidence that would be made available to the public at the trial.Nonetheless, the facts are the facts.

The common thread here is Islam. Allowing Muslims to serve in the U.S. military in 2009 makes as much sense as if we would have allowed Nazi’s to serve in our armed forces in 1939. It would have been lunacy then, and its lunacy now.

Continue reading here.


World Net Daily: HOMELAND INSECURITY
Military jihadists fill 'every branch'
Ultimate 5th column penetration, warns best-selling 'Muslim Mafia'

Excerpt:

"Muslims should stand up and fight the aggressor." That's what Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan said about America before he and possibly other Muslim soldiers at Fort Hood shot 43 fellow soldiers, killing 12, who were returning from Iraq and Afghanistan.

"He said Muslims had a right to attack" the U.S., said Col. Terry Lee, who worked with Hasan at the Texas post, where the devout Sunni Muslim refused deployment. "He said Muslims shouldn't be fighting Muslims," he added. "He was very clear on that."

Shockingly, a growing number of other Muslim American soldiers as well as civilian contractors have put their religion before their duty. Some like Hasan have killed, or tried to kill, their fellow soldiers. Others have infiltrated the military in order to undermine it and aid and comfort the enemy.

According to an explosive new book, "Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America," Hasan is just the tip of a jihadist Fifth Column operating within the ranks of the U.S. military – which is too blinded by political correctness to see the threat.

Security officials at Gitmo have been investigating a possible new spy ring involving several "dirty" Arabic linguists who are accused among other things of:

omitting valuable intelligence from their translations of detainee interrogations;


slipping notes to detainees inside copies of the Quran;


coaching detainees to make allegations of abuse against interrogators; and


meeting with suspects on the terrorist watch list while traveling back in the United States.

More than 75 former Gitmo detainees have returned to the battlefield or anti-American jihad. Some met with the suspect Muslim translators. Others were privately counseled by chaplains also under investigation for security breaches.

Gitmo security officials recently met with FBI agents in Philadelphia to aid their investigation into one of the Muslim linguists under contract at Gitmo, according to sources quoted in the book who are familiar with the investigation.

They also this summer briefed members of Congress about the prison camp's internal security breaches, according to "Muslim Mafia," which is co-authored by former federal agent P. David Gaubatz and investigative journalist Paul Sperry, author of "Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington," which is being used by law enforcement and the military.

"Three years of investigations have revealed the presence of pro-jihad/anti-Western activities among the civilian contractor and military linguist population serving Joint Task Force Guantanamo," states a copy of the classified Gitmo briefing, which was prepared in May 2009 for the FBI and CIA, as well as the congressional intelligence committees.

Continue reading here.

Hat Tips to both links.

*******

There is a page full of articles with more details at World Net Daily

*******

More blog posts:

Nice Deb: How Did The Army Miss All The Red Flags?

The Obama File: Major Malik Nadal Hasan -- Jihadii

Concluding quote:

And this morning, the military-loathing Obama, showing no emotion, said, "blah, blah, blah, . . . don't jump to conclusions . . . blah, blah, blah," and ran and hid in the White House, taking no questions from the press.

Newsbusters:
Emerging Bias: Newsweek Claims Fort Hood Shooter Exposed Overstretched 'Military on the Brink'

This is certainly scary to learn:

Constitutionally Speaking: Ft. Hood Shooter Was a Member of Obama's Homeland Security Transition Team

Even though authorities are still searching for "the motive," perhaps all we need to know to figure it out is:

By BRETT J. BLACKLEDGE, Associated Press Writer Brett J. Blackledge, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON – His name appears on radical Internet postings.

Atlas Shrugs: Major Muslim Hasan Advised Obama's Department of Homeland Security

Evil Conservative Online: Ft. Hood Shooting: Obama's Insensitivity Shocks and Awes

Excerpt:

But instead of a somber chief executive offering reassuring words and expressions of sympathy and compassion, viewers saw a wildly disconnected and inappropriately light president making introductory remarks. At the event, a Tribal Nations Conference hosted by the Department of Interior's Bureau of Indian affairs, the president thanked various staffers and offered a "shout-out" to "Dr. Joe Medicine Crow -- that Congressional Medal of Honor winner." Three minutes in, the president spoke about the shooting, in measured and appropriate terms. Who is advising him?

Anyone at home aware of the major news story of the previous hours had to have been stunned. An incident like this requires a scrapping of the early light banter. The president should apologize for the tone of his remarks, explain what has happened, express sympathy for those slain and appeal for calm and patience until all the facts are in. That's the least that should occur.

Indeed, an argument could be made that Obama should have canceled the Indian event, out of respect for people having been murdered at an Army post a few hours before. That would have prevented any sort of jarring emotional switch at the event.

Did the president's team not realize what sort of image they were presenting to the country at this moment? The disconnect between what Americans at home knew had been going on -- and the initial words coming out of their president's mouth was jolting, if not disturbing.

I must admit, I had the same, sick-to-my-stomach reaction when Obama showed just how soulless he really can be...

America's Right: A History of 'Frightening Insensitivity'

A More Likely Scenario

Soros Fixed On Destroying America

I hope that more and more bloggers, like Ed Lasky at American Thinker, continue to write well-informed posts about the evil financial crisis perpetrator - George Soros - so that those here in America who are currently ignorant (or just plain oblivious) to that awful man's schemes will wake up and smell the corruption that he and his cronies have wrecked upon our nation.

When Obama supporters like Mike Rucker (who previously used to comment here) continue to drink the Kool-Aid and go on and on about race, the confederate flag, and the ruse of health care while ignoring the Marxist thugocracy and unconstitutional shadow government that Obama's 'hidden' puppeteers are creating; it makes me wonder if a certain portion of the Obama voters will EVER uncover their eyes, ears, and minds and see the reality that exists all around their cyanide-laced (metaphorically speaking) drunken stupor of worship that they still have for this bogus POTUS?

Great comments over there. Here is one of the best:

Posted by: fwi
Sep 24, 12:35 AM

This is so chilling. I have no doubt that Soros is behind all the so called crises in our country. His malice and his money are what motivates this evil imposter in the White House. England was destroyed by this man, and he is doing the same to this country.

The country has never been in more peril, and it is coming from within. When I see a clip of Obama proclaiming he was going to "fundamentally change America" and people are wildly cheering, I don't know who I am angrier at--Obama for being evil and hating America, or the grossly irresponsible people who voted for him.

I believe that Obama is trying to dismantle and discredit the CIA so that it would be ineffective against Soros and other shadowy figures that have put this imposter in the White House.

I am convinced if the facts were known, Obama would be found guilty of treason and Soros and Axelrod would be in jail. THe UN address with all of the slips of the tongue, the strange direction of the comments, the body language was the tipping point for me. The problems with Obama really go far beyond this health care bill.

This is the real Black Swan. THe financial "crisis" was the warm- up, manufactured and engineered by Soros. Follow the money. The evil of Soros is fully fixed on destroying this country. He is using Obama to do his bidding while he stays hidden.

If you want to read more blogposts about Soros' evil ways, go to the links in this comment:

Posted by: Samwise
Sep 23, 10:52 PM

Barbara Jares Wrote:
> Here is another item about Soros. I met a couple
> who moved to US from England to escape the
> socialist government and they said, "Of course you
> know what Soros did in England don't you? "
> Of course the answer is no. They said that Soros
> tried to take down the financial world in England
> but failed...something to do with silver. Please
> look into that, it won't take long and it might be
> very important...for you! Thanks again!
> Barb

Barb,
For all of his purported hatred of Capitalism, Soros is pretty much the poster boy for the worst kinds of abuses of Capitalism. The man is a vulture. Here are some links explaining exactly what Soros is capable of:

He hid his Jewish identity during WWII, and then profited from the misery of his fellow Jews. He even helped in confiscating their property!

[sweetness-light.com]

He made a financial killing by intentionally causing "Black Wednesday" in England

[http://www.articlesbase.com/finance-articles/forex-legend-george-soros-and-the-british-pound-137964.html]

He attempted to ruin the economy of Hungary -- his home country!

[sweetness-light.com]

Here he is gloating about the latest financial crisis in this country (which he no doubt has a hand in)
[sweetness-light.com]

Previous Posts About Soros at Talk Wisdom

Hat Tip:

American Thinker

The Real Story Behind Scare Force One

DefendUSx has a post up that reveals the real story behind the Scare Force One scandal!

An Ominous Battle Going On Between the Obama Admin. and the U.S. Military - the Real Reason for Scare Force One

Did anyone really believe the "photo op" excuse anyway??

I think that the internal struggle going on (as revealed in the story at the link) and the external struggle against the awful, dangerous, anti-American policies of this Bogus Potus and his cronies will bring forth millions more American Patriots who will continue to fight to get their country back!!! Eventually, this usurper will be totally exposed as the radical that he is and We The People Patriots will be victorious in the end!!!

I pray to God that We The People will win this fight!!!

Hat Tip:

DefendUSx at Repub X Blog

*******
Recall how vague gabby Gibby was about the incident until he was told what to say? People...their "official" story is just not plausible! I sincerely hope that the aide spills the beans about it and testifies in court some day against this Resident liar!

White House Aide Resigns Over Flyover Flap

*******

The Obama File doesn't think that the "official" story is plausible, either!

The Air Farce One Report -- A Classic Case Of Misdirection

*******

Obama File: Obama Air Farce One

Notice what is written at the bottom of the Obama File entry:

Freedom Watch, a public interest watchdog, has filed Freedom of Information Act requests with the Obama administration demanding that it make public government videos of the NYC flyover by President Obama's plane.

Freedom Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman said Obama had no qualms about releasing detailed memos last month describing interrogation techniques used by the CIA, so the administration shouldn't have reservations about releasing the flyover video as well.

President Obama thinks it cool to release national intelligence documents concerning American intelligence gathering techniques of terrorists," Klayman said, "but ironically terrorizes the people of Manhattan, who have the tragedy of September 11 emblazoned in their emotional psyches, but then refuses to release benign video of his own incompetence and lack of national security common sense."

Klayman said, "There's honestly something that we're not being told," he said. "Why were they flying over New York City? It's very strange. It makes no sense. Why would you need Air Force One for a photo-op?"Klayman said Freedom Watch will not back down until the truth about the exercise is fully exposed. "

If indeed this is just a snafu, it shows the incredible national security incompetence of the Obama administration," he said. "But the government releases whatever it wants to release. It's never really constrained by national security because it does whatever is in its own interest. Obviously it's not in the Obama administration's interest to tell the truth."



*******
Update 5/11/09

It has become apparent that the Scare Force One photo released by the NOBama Admin. is actually a photoshop job!!

Texas Darlin: Exclusive - Air Force One Flyover Pic Photoshopped

More lies from the most unethical, corrupt and evil admin. ever!

Obama's Unreciprocated Bow is Gesture of Subservience

Yesterday, I noticed that Alan Keyes was one of the first to blog about our usurper Resident Obama "bowing" before the Saudi king. Obama’s Bow- Protocol nod or wink of appeasement? Go to the link and see the photo and video in the sidebar. I just can't even bring myself to post it here.

My comment there:

Good post and excellent point, Dr. Keyes. I may have missed it, but I do not think that the video showed any of the other leaders bowing to the Saudi king.

How frightening it is to see how far we have come from "the American custom of refusing to bow or salute any foreign monarch" symbol of allegiance to America and the sovereignty policies from the past.

So many Americans are ignorant (unfortunately) about how certain acts look to the Arab and Muslim world. They might dismiss your very valid concerns here and claim that Obama was just being "respectful." Yeah...right.

When Obama made the mistake of saying he had visited "all 57 states" while campaigning for the presidential election, how many people in America realized that there are 57 Arab/Muslim states? And, recall his interview with George Stephanopoulos (sp?) where Obama stated, "my Muslim faith." No Christian that I know would ever have made such a mistake. Not even close. It was dismissed as a "slip of the tongue," but was it really?

My plan was to share the links to blog posts about this that I have since found in my sidebar. Instead, take a look at how many blogs are discussing this issue via this search titled, Obama bows to Saudi king.

There are probably hundreds, if not thousands of blog posts about this. However, I was curious to see what Jihad Watch had to say. They have the video up and have stated:

Breach of protocol. "Americans do not bow to foreign monarchs because that act signified the monarch's power over his subjects."

"Obama bows down to Saudi King (updated)," by Clarice Feldman at The American Thinker, April 2 (thanks to Doc Washburn):

[...] See Miss Manners on the protocol. Americans do not bow to foreign monarchs because that act signified the monarch's power over his subjects.

Is the Lamestream media reporting on this? I haven't turned on my T.V. yet today. Somehow, I doubt that they will share the concern that such an act brings to the minds of American Patriots. I doubt that they will share that such submission shown to this Saudi king is not only a breach of protocol but may symbolize something far worse in our Usurper-in-chief.

Time to read the American Thinker link.

That link led to another American Thinker post: With bowed head and bended knee.

Conclusion at that link:

The old saying that one picture is worth a thousand words is actually amplified when it comes to cross-cultural communication. I have little doubt that the Muslim world's media will not be as circumspect as their American mainstream colleagues in displaying the demi-prostration of the American leader carrying the name Hussein to the guardian of Islam's holiest cities.


Until evidence is produced that Barack Obama habitually bows and bends his knee before others, I will have to assume that he meant this gesture to carry meaning. It is simply amazing to me that our media will not even present this image to the American public.


Thomas Lifson is editor and publisher of American Thinker.

Check back for updates.

Hat Tips:

Alan Keyes blog

Jihad Watch

With bowed head and bended knee

*******

Ahhh! I ended up being quite busy today, so forgive me for not including many updates. The following are some comments that I accumulated while reading over at American Thinker. I haven't gotten through them all (last I checked there were several pages with over 250 comments!) however, these were the specific ones that I picked out while reading the first few pages:

Quoted comments:

ender Wrote:

Is anyone watching this? He is speaking at the G20
summit, taking questions from the press. He
appears to be cracking up, melting right in front
of my eyes. Stuttering, losing focus. It's painful
to watch.
Taking forever .... to say nothing. He sneezes and
loses his train of thought.
Ugh

UPDATE: So now he goes off the prepared list of
reporters questions and takes random questions. He
says he'll take a question from a "foreigner" -
realizes his gaffe and says ...." I am the
foreigner".

He says he doesn't want to be accused of gender
bias (ha ha) and he picks a woman whom I believe
he thinks is a Muslim. She's not. She's an Indian
and asks O, when he met with the Indian Prime
Minister, what was discussed to fight the
terrorism against India coming from Pakistan
(Bingo!).

Obama can't answer. Starts to compliment the
magnificence of the Indian prime minister, and she
agrees. The crowd doesn't like that the journalist
supports her PM - Obama shoots back, did you have
something to do with him getting elected? (Strange
is not the word.) And then says, just kidding.

As if the media didn't put the Mansourian
candidate in the White House.

He avoids answering ...........stutters, talks
about many things and then goes off on carbon
footprints. I kid you not. If anyone grabs a video
of that exchange, please forward.

[atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com]
09/04/obama-bows-and-kisses-the-of-saudi-king.html
#comments

· His first phone call was to Abbas, the terrorist
leader of the Palestinian Authority and al Fatah;

· His first interview was on al-Arabiya News
Channel, where he apologized for the United
States;

· His first appointment of an envoy to Syria was
the appointment of George Soros;

· He bankrolled Hamas out of Whitehouse funds to
the tune of $23 million, following Israel’s
invasion of Gaza to stop the missile strikes;

· He promised another 900 million to Gaza;

· He immediately adopted the Saudi Plan as policy
for Israel, which favors a contiguous Palestinian
state (that is, a geographic area that connects
Gaza with the West Bank and includes Jerusalem –
necessarily dividing Israel);

· He dismissed charges against the perpetrators of
the bombing of the USS Cole;

· He announced the shut-down of Gitmo, and
apologized to the Islamic world for its
existence;

· He announced that his first summit would be an
Islamic summit;

· He turned a blind eye to Iran’s launch of a
satellite capable of triangulating coordinates for
ICBMs that Iran is furiously trying to develop for
the delivery of nuclear weapons;

· He turned a blind eye to the release of A. Q.
Khan, Pakistan’s top nuclear scientist, who is
believed to be the very person to have delivered
nuclear bomb technology to North Korea;

· He intends to eliminate our anti-ballistic
missile defense program;

· He intends to reduce our nuclear weapons arsenal
by 75%;

· He intends to reduce our military budget by
25%;

· He has reneged on developing nuclear power;

· He continues to block off-shore or expanded
drilling;

· He continues to try and block the production of
coal (45% of our electric generating capability)

So who's side is this guy on?

[www.chiaobama.com]

Ender, your compilation of our traitor presidents deeds is unbelievable and outrageous. Thanks for updating us on what an imbecile our president is! GOD save us from this doofus!!!

*******
daveinboca Wrote:

Back when I was the only Arabist in the American
Embassy, I had to translate a conversation between
then-Crown Prince Abdullah and the American
Ambassador. The protocol has always been in the
many meetings between American POTUSes and any
king, emperor, or Dalai Lama or Pope has been a
slight nod of deference at the very most while
shaking the dignitary's hand. Another [blank]-up by
Hillary's State Dept.

FDR met King Abdul-Aziz in 1945 just after Yalta
and since then, every POTUS except HST & JFK have
met Saudi monarchs. Never has one done anything
approaching the near genuflection that the Won
displayed at the G-20, not even Jimmy Carter, who
famously left his personal briefing book behind
when he visited the King during a visit in
1977---an [blank]-up of hilarious proportions

Another [blank]-up by Hillary's State Dept. Welcome
back, Carter!


Dave, you are only going to wish Obambi was another Carter. He is ten times worse!!

*******

Posted by: omg
Apr 03, 07:36 AM





I've called 10 REPUBLICAN congressman in the House and asked them to start impeachment. their staff listened sympathetically, but more importantly they said they are receiving hundreds of calls each week with same request. so my idea is if each one of us called 10 congressman and made a list of who we contacted ,,,,we could have some impact

*******

Posted by: liberty4usa
Apr 03, 10:05 AM

I cannot imagine the leader of the most powerful nation on earth could disgrace our country in this way unless he truly despised our position in the world.

Our media knows the symbolic significance of this- yet stands in allegiance to him. On January 20th the world became a very dangerous place compared to the day before, which was already dangerous, this gesture of subservience is a disgrace on a scale unimaginable.

The credibility of Sharia in the Muslim world must be skyrocketing today while the gaping vulnerability of the wrong person as US president is not lost on any friend or foe of America.

*******

Posted by: Observer 99
Apr 02, 11:12 PM

President Obama is on thin ice already. After just a few weeks in office he has made a series of embarrassing and unacceptable foreign affairs gaffes. It began when he insulted the Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso by not giving him a full joint press conference with flags. He repeated this mistake when he insulted the British Prime Minister Gordon Brown not long after. Not only did he deny the British PM a proper joint press conference but he also insulted him again with his thoughtless gift of 25 DVDs. The British PM gave Obama a pen holder carved from the wood of HMS Gannet - a Royal Navy anti-slavery ship, its commissioning
certificate and a first edition of a famous Churchill biography. In return,
Obama gave Brown 25 DVDs which do not even play on British machines.

To add insult to injury, the Obamas continued on their gaffe-strewn path to infamy when they visited the Queen at Buckingham Palace and Michelle Obama put her arm round the Queen and hugged her, which is not protocol at all. Then, President Obama bows to the King of Saudi Arabia, apparently without the faintest idea how this gesture would be received throughout the United States and the wider world.

It seems to clear that in 2010 the people of the United States owe it to
themselves to put GOP majorities in both the House and the Senate, and then in 2012 consign this one-term president to the same historical chapter as Buchanan, Harding and Carter before any more damage can be done.

*******

Posted by: Annette
Apr 03, 06:27 AM

J A L Wrote:

Annette Wrote:

----- Good points JAL!
Is this any worse than Bush holding his hand?


Yes Annette, it is much worse.
President Bush walked alongside the Saudi king,
holding his hand. This was a gesture of friendship
between equals; mutual respect between the leaders
of their respective countries.
Barack Obama hurried across the room to grab the
king's hand and bowed low to him. They did not bow
to each other; indeed, the king did not even
return the bow. This is an appropriate exchange
between a servant and his master, a child and an
adult, or an inferior nation to a superior.
That uncultured fool demeaned his office and
disrespected every American living and dead by
abasing himself before the house of Saud.

*******

Posted by: Barry in Australia
Apr 02, 09:29 PM

i find this really quite disturbing and quite illuminating.I cannot believe this was a mistake,this was Obama bowing or if you like grovelling at the feet of a Islamic King.He did not bow to the Queen of England,oh no...only to his Islamic King.
Note Obama also met and spoke in Indonesian with the President of Indonesia and has committed to visiting Indonesia later this year the most populous Islamic state on earth.
Is this the "new world order" Obama speaks about so often now?
I feel sorry for my many friends in the US,you have been charmed by the greatest snake oil salesman since PT Barnum.
Be very careful America,be very careful,this man has another agenda!

*******
Posted by: halara
Apr 02, 09:25 PM

TAQIYYA ...he's no Dhimmi, he's taqiyya..

[www.islam-watch.org]

*******

Posted by: Sage1505
Apr 02, 08:31 PM

I agree with Caolila. I have been pointing out this idiots socialistic ways and the policies his goons in Washingon are pushing through Congress and the House and the uninformed who put this fool in office cannot see the trees for the forest because they are all too busy watching American Idol and Dancing with the Stars to watch the news, read the paper and research what this traitor is doing to our country at lightening speed.


caolila Wrote:

Really what can we expect when these folks paid
for his education and funded his campaign
illegally? Of course he has to bow to them in
person. I am sure it is part of muslim culture of
respect and honor.

The dummies are the american people who ensured he
got elected. Our education system and culture
ensured these kids had such poor critical thinking
skills, and such short attention spans, they
simply could not (or would not) research the
truth.

Now the rest of us are stuck in this mess.

The only way out is to force disclosure of his
birth certificate and Occidental school records.
It's overwhelminging likely that those documents
will be his undoing.

*******

Posted by: pmk
Apr 02, 04:18 PM

Annette Wrote:
Is this any worse than Bush holding his hand?
Two possible answers here:

1. Bush wasn't being subservient by holding the man's hand while they walked.
Obama wasn't shaking his hand. He bent down to kiss it. What other head of state, in any western country, does that?

2. If liberals were so upset at Bush then where is their pique with Obama?

The State Dept's protocol guidelines recommend that you check the cultural practices of the other country. This didn't take place in Saudi Arabia. What was done is not common cultural practice in London. When in Rome, do as the Romans do. Obama wasn't in Riyadh. /quote

A Russian "Prophet?" Don't Think So!

I don't know where to begin! In fact, I couldn't quite make up my mind about the title of this post. I may change it. Anyway, first you may need to read the article: As if Things Weren't Bad Enough, Russian Professor Predicts End of U.S.
In Moscow, Igor Panarin's Forecasts Are All the Rage; America 'Disintegrates' in 2010

What were my first thoughts?

The guy is talking out of both sides of his a**!

Case in point. Read these two paragraphs:

For a decade, Russian academic Igor Panarin has been predicting the U.S. will fall apart in 2010. For most of that time, he admits, few took his argument -- that an economic and moral collapse will trigger a civil war and the eventual breakup of the U.S. -- very seriously. Now he's found an eager audience: Russian state media.

Now read this one:

"There's a 55-45% chance right now that disintegration will occur," he says. "One could rejoice in that process," he adds, poker-faced. "But if we're talking reasonably, it's not the best scenario -- for Russia." Though Russia would become more powerful on the global stage, he says, its economy would suffer because it currently depends heavily on the dollar and on trade with the U.S.

Now...pay special attention to this part:

"Though Russia would become more powerful on the global stage, he says, its economy would suffer because it currently depends heavily on the dollar and on trade with the U.S."

DUH! YA THINK???

My next thought was what a piece of propaganda sh** this guy is selling. (Pardon my asterisks!! )

Then, it hit me. Just like the ObamaBorg Bots who are patrolling the blogs and annoying Conservatives with their pointless drivel (Hmmm...reminds me of someone who often posts here! Hint: His initials are "ST!" - heh heh!) this Russian former KGB thug is utilizing the ole' Saul Alinsky strategy propaganda tool!

Can you pick out how many of the following apply to Panarin's propaganda?

According to Alinsky, the main job of the organizer is to bait an opponent into reacting. “The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength.”

Rule 1: Power is not only what you have, but what an opponent thinks you have. If your organization is small, hide your numbers in the dark and raise a din that will make everyone think you have many more people than you do.

Rule 2: Never go outside the experience of your people.
The result is confusion, fear, and retreat.

Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.

Rule 4: Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. “You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”

Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.

Rule 6: A good tactic is one your people enjoy. “If your people aren’t having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.”

Rule 7: A tactic that drags on for too long becomes a drag. Commitment may become ritualistic as people turn to other issues.

Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage.”

Rule 9: The threat is more terrifying than the thing itself. When Alinsky leaked word that large numbers of poor people were going to tie up the washrooms of O’Hare Airport, Chicago city authorities quickly agreed to act on a longstanding commitment to a ghetto organization. They imagined the mayhem as thousands of passengers poured off airplanes to discover every washroom occupied. Then they imagined the international embarrassment and the damage to the city’s reputation.

Rule 10: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Avoid being trapped by an opponent or an interviewer who says, “Okay, what would you do?”

Wow! Can you believe it? I can FINALLY THANK Obama for something! Turning my eyes towards understanding the mantra of the Marxist/Communist propagandist - Saul Alinsky - so that now I can clearly recognize such trash talk when it is being spewed!!

Hooray! (Mike will be happy to hear this...well...on second thought...NOT!)

I also wanted SO BAD to make fun of the guy's first name...Igor? I know, I know...it's probably as popular as the name "John" is in the U.S. But I can't help think of that movie "Young Frankenstein" whenever I hear about or read that name! Wasn't Marty Feldman's character named Igor?

HT's:

Wall Street Journal.com

FilmSite.org

IMDB.com

Never Ending Lunacy of Political Cults

Did you naively think that Obama’s election and the nearly total cessation of any hostilities in Iraq would finally spell the end of the anti-war protests that have occasionally erupted since 2003? Silly you. Because on November 10, 2008, the relentless members of the anti-American political cult World Can’t Wait uncorked a fresh new protest in downtown Berkeley, this time calling on Obama to withdraw all troops from Afghanistan.

See Zomblog's Stop the World Can't Wait — I want to get off.

Best comment:

2Yashmak on Nov 12, 2008 at 11:57 am:
You can’t teach idiots to stop being an idiots. Why not? Because they’re idiots.

Hey! I've got an idea! Why don't they go and celebrate outside "boogeyman" (boogeyman???) William - the unrepentant terrorist - Ayers' home? Can you believe that ABC gave a platform for this domestic terrorist - who tried to con the public into believing he's "normal" on Good Morning America today?

Hey....loons of a feather ought to flock together...no?

Can you believe that ABC had this guy on their morning show???

Sheesh!! I feel like I'm in the Twilight Zone! This cannot be real...

Is Ayers now considered a "kinder, gentler terrorist?" /sarc off.

At least this sub-headline appeared at the site:

Chris Cuomo Grills '60s Radical Bill Ayers

HT's: Zomblog

GMA

Obama Fascism's Global Reach

Senator Barack Obama's cult of unity, strength and purity has reached global scale as supporters of his brand of fascism at the highest levels of governmental silence discent and the free expression of opinion and truth. The march toward global socialism is alive and well and moving forward in the name Obama!

read more digg story

Excerpt from WorldNetDaily:

DISPATCH FROM NAIROBI
Kenya holds Corsi 'incommunicado'
Officials scuttle WND reporter's news conference on Obama probe

Posted: October 07, 2008
7:26 am Eastern

© 2008 WorldNetDaily


WND senior staff writer Jerry Corsi

NAIROBI, Kenya – The government of Kenya is holding WND senior staff reporter Jerome Corsi incommunicado at the airport until he departs the country after police shut down a scheduled news conference in which he planned to announce the findings of his investigation into Barack Obama's connections in the country.

Corsi, the author of the No. 1 best-selling book "The Obama Nation," was picked up by authorities at his hotel at 9:45 a.m. and detained at Nyayo House, the provincial headquarters for Nairobi.

"Just as we were about to start the 10 a.m. press conference at the Grand Regency Hotel in Nairobi, Kenyan immigration approached us and detained us," Corsi told WND by telephone this morning. "Tim Bueler, my publicist, and I are now in the immigration offices, with our passports taken. The immigration officer told the press, 'There is no problem, and Dr. Corsi is a friend of Kenya.'"

Corsi and Bueler are booked on a British Airways flight to London tonight, an airline agent confirmed to WND. But Joseph Farah, WND editor and CEO, said he was in touch with Corsi until about 9:30 a.m. Eastern today and has not been able to reach him for several hours.

"We also hear unconfirmed reports from the government claiming it has 'deported' Corsi," Farah said. "Since Corsi was scheduled to leave the country today, this would seem to be a strange action from a government that was well aware of Corsi's presence, his travels and his activities in the country for the last week."

A senior immigration official in charge of investigations, Carlos Maluta was quoted by the Associated Press as saying: "We still haven't decided what to do with him."

Despite reports elsewhere to the contrary, Corsi has not been arrested or charged with any offense.

An official with the Embassy of Kenya in Washington said he was unaware of Corsi's detention. The Ministry of Immigration in Nairobi could not be reached for comment. WND tried again, later, to contact a spokesman for the embassy and was told by a receptionist the official word is that Corsi was not detained. "He's enjoying his holiday in Kenya," she said.

Yeah right...Corsi is "enjoying his holiday in Kenya." I surely doubt that being wisked away by immigration officials just before he was scheduled to report his findings is an "enjoy your holiday" moment!

How apropos is the timing for this snatching away of an American reporter who was just about to drop a hot potato on Obama's connections with Odinga?

Are they keeping him quiet until after tonight's debate?

Will the MSM report any of this?

Would they have reported this story if a pro-Obama book author was treated in this way in Kenya?

Can't wait to read what Jerome Corsi found out...must be a doozy

See also: Source: Kenya quashed 'smear' of Obama
Corsi detained because he was 'going to drop a hot potato'


HT: WorldNetDaily