Showing posts with label indoctrination. Show all posts
Showing posts with label indoctrination. Show all posts

Two Examples: Homosexual Behavior Destroys Lives

There is a lot of ugly information coming out about Obama's horrible choice for "safe school czar" - Kevin Jennings. When you go to the link, have a barf bag ready. It is all quite sickening...to say the least! [WARNING! VERY GRAPHIC CONTENT at the link below! Don't claim I didn't warn you.]

Big Government: Fistgate - Barack Obama's "Safe Schools Czar's 2000 Conference Promoted Fisting to 14-year-olds.

That title alone is enough to turn your stomach! Such depravity...

In a somewhat related matter (additionally despicable topic but thankfully not as graphic), GMPilot continues to make an issue of the church cover-ups regarding homosexuality in the priesthood of the Catholic Church. In a thread at my message board that was started a few years ago (and has 1,152 views), GMPilot recently added the following:

News of the Weak(land)

There’s been no church cover-up news in a while now, but this one comes just in time for Christmas.

From the Journal Sentinel, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 03 Dec 2009:


Quote:
Weakland shredded copies of sex abuse reports, documents say
By Bruce Vielmetti of the Journal Sentinel
Posted: Dec. 3, 2009

Former Milwaukee Archbishop Rembert Weakland routinely shredded copies of weekly reports about sexual abuse by priests, according to formerly sealed testimony turned over to Milwaukee County's district attorney on Thursday.

In a 1993 deposition, Weakland admitted destroying copies of the reports in his office, according to a partial transcript of the deposition released by Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests.

Peter Isely, SNAP's Midwest director, turned over the partial transcript, as well as portions of the logs to which Weakland was referring, to Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm and asked him to review them for any possible criminal violations. Chisholm accepted the records and promised a thorough review.

The 16-year-old deposition documents have come to light during the discovery process in more than a dozen civil fraud lawsuits filed against the Milwaukee archdiocese.

SNAP made the announcements at a news conference Thursday morning outside Chisholm's office at the Milwaukee County courts complex.

Julie Wolf, communications director for the Archdiocese of Milwaukee, said Thursday she had not seen the documents SNAP released and could make no comment on them for the archdiocese.

In the deposition, Weakland explains that he got copies of the weekly logs made by vicars in the archdiocese about ongoing problem priests. He said he would read them, then shred them because he didn't want to keep them in his office. He would "try to remember anything that is quite serious and important," and later discuss the matters with the vicar.

SNAP also released portions of logs kept on two abusive priests, Siegfried Widera and Franklyn Becker. Widera killed himself in 2003 after police cornered him in Mexico; Becker has been removed from the priesthood. Isely said not all portions of all vicar logs have been released yet as part of the civil litigation.

Isely said SNAP also will ask Archbishop-designate Jerome Listecki to censure and discipline Weakland and anyone else who may have been involved in covering up sex abuse by clergy. He said Listecki has refused to say whether he would review why the Diocese of La Crosse, where he is bishop, has cleared more clergy accused of abuse than most dioceses.

Listecki told Wisconsin Public Radio that he did not have enough time left in his term as bishop in La Crosse and that, besides, it was the holiday season.


A picture of the alleged representative of Christ may be found at http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/78431087.html


My response:

The difference between playing "church" rather than being of the Church of Christ:

What makes you think that the people involved in such cover-up, corruption, and/or sexual misconduct are genuine followers of Jesus Christ?

"Church" cover-up of the type you are describing is limited to, and representative of, the human side of the equation. The church of Jesus Christ (all genuine saved believers) are on the side of God, His written Word the Bible, and His Living Word - Jesus Christ.

I can tell you with 99% certainty that the "alleged representative of Christ" is more like a MIS-REPRESENTATIVE of Christ. The 1% is there in case the pseudo archbishop repents - which we all must do.
__________________
See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ. Colossians 2:8

The eyes of the Lord move to and fro throughout the earth to show Himself strong to those whose hearts are fully committed to Him. 2 Chronicles 16:9

*******

Thoughts, comments and questions from readers on either of these two stories are welcomed in the comment section.

Whenever the subject of homosexuality is brought up here at Talk Wisdom, the discussion often becomes a battle. I know it's difficult, but let's try to keep a civil tone. The Kevin Jennings story is so outrageous that it is hard to believe this evil pervert was chosen by Obama for "safe schools czar."

Hat Tip:

Big Government.

*******
P.S. GateWay Pundit has two stories on the radical homosexual agenda being pushed upon children in public schools. Jim Hoft's site has been continually attacked since revealing this story. The link isn't working right now, but when it is, be sure to read about the books and the content in them in the post there. Absolutely unbelievable that schools are promoting such gay p0rno books - to children!!

Links are working now. Here are the two links:

GateWay Pundit: Obama Safe Schools Czar Promoted Fisting to Children

GateWay Pundit: Obama's Safe Schools Czar Promotes Child Sex Books; Praised Man-Boy Sex Leader

Obama Revolution Over!

The headline for today's post is taken from the title of the most recent post over at The Obama File. However, what I liked even more over at the website were the signs with Obama's face on them that read: FRAUD, FAIL, and DELUSION. IMO, that encapsulates Obama in a nutshell! [pun?]

The American people are awake - fully awake now and this Obama disaster has started to officially come crumbling down.

Note this, too:



No ObamaCare In 2009

Senior Congressional Democrats told ABC News today it is highly unlikely that a health care reform bill will be completed this year, just a week after Barack Obama declared he was "absolutely confident" he'll be able to sign one by then.

"Getting this done by the by the end of the year is a no-go," a senior Democratic leadership aide told ABC News. Two other key Congressional Democrats also told ABC News the same thing.

This may come as an unwelcome surprise for the White House, where officials from Obama on down have repeatedly said the health care bill would be signed into law by the end of the year.


THAT'S GREAT NEWS!!!

There will be thousands of blog posts about last night's major GOP victories in Virginia and New Jersey. However, to get started I will refer readers to Newsmax.

Brit Hume: Intensity Has Shifted to GOP

Democrat Owens Wins N.Y. House Race

[Note: Even though Hoffman, a relatively unknown conservative did not win, he certainly came close! He conceded with class - and the truth:


"I think that the Republican Party is broad enough to handle many different candidates, but the fact is that I'm a commonsense conservative Republican — I am not a radical," Hoffman said Monday. "The point is that Assemblywoman Scozzafava was not a moderate Republican. She was an ultraliberal Republican.]


GOP Sweeps Governor Races in Virginia, New Jersey

GOP's Christie Defeats Corzine in N.J.

Rove: McDonnell’s Victory 'Astonishing'

But the best news has to be this:

Dick Morris:
GOP Sweep Imperils Obamacare

As if the election results from last night weren't enough to put a thorn in the side of Obama and his Marxist cohorts, look out for the double-whammy coming up tomorrow!

Citizen Wells reports:
Michele Bachmann, Tea Party Express, November 5, 2009, Capitol Building, Washington DC, Nancy Pelosi, Congress, Defeat socialist health care bill


It was reported that Obama didn't bother to watch the election results last night. Does this come as a surprise to most of us who have been paying close attention? Of course not! It's typical of this narcissist to do such a thing. However, would it be considered over the top for Newsbusters to expose that
Obama Watched HBO Special About Himself Instead of Election Results
??!!

Last, but certainly not least, is Big Government's exposure of more Obama-worship videos indoctrinating school children.

Go here to view all of the propaganda videos of indoctrination - if you can stand it!!

Hat Tips:

Newsmax

The Obama File

Citizen Wells

Newsbusters

Big Government

Creepy Obama Propaganda Video to Indoctrinate Children!

Do I need to say anything else about it?? Could you imagine the Media of Mass Deception going absolutely crazy if this had been done for President George W. Bush? I rest my case.


Sorry Folks - Video was removed...BLAH,BLAH,BLAH! Probably still available elsewhere - do a search.

P.S. The theme of the second song is from "The Battle Hymn of the Republic!"

Hat Tip:

The Obama File

*******
More blog posts on this:

No Quarter: Children Singing In Praise Of The One

Michele Malkin: “Mmm mmm mmm:” New details about the Dear Leader song video; Update: School responds

One Ongoing Battle

Good and bad news about the ongoing (and seemingly never-ending) battle against homosexual indoctrination, continued lawsuits and the radical activists push for same-sex "marriage."

First, the bad news. Alliance Defense Fund has announced that there has been a class action lawsuit filed:

State Class Action Lawsuit Filed Challenging California Marriage Amendment

PR Newswire: “This lawsuit claims that section 7.5 of Article I violates the equal protection clause of the State Constitution. McCoy said, ‘we chose to bring this lawsuit in State Court rather than in Federal Court because sexual orientation is a protected class under California State Law and it is not recognized in Federal Law.’”

The complaint: Burns v. State of California


However, as the following comment tells us, this might be a blessing in disguise:

Karen Grube
Posted June 28, 2009 at 9:09 am
I love it! This would be a terrific opportunity to blow the lid off of the concept that sexual orientation should be a protected class at all. I would challed this law firm to prove there is any real way to measure or determine one’s sexual orientation the way there is one’s race, gender, or age. There is no DNA test, no ‘gay gene’ to prove one’s sexual orientation. We could prove, in court, that it is simply a lifestyle choice! How cool would that be? I’m serious. This could be the perfect venue to repeal the so-called sexual orientation protections that currently exist in California state law. Oh, and besides that, I would challege it on the basis that having such protections violates federal law, since federal law doesn’t recognize such protections. This could be terrific! Use this as the opportunity to PROVE people don’t get special protections for their lifestyle choices! That would be wonderful!


Karen Grube makes some excellent points! Why is an aberrant behavior being given protections in California state law that are not recognized in federal law? Should people get special protections (read: over and above the protections of those who do not participate in such behaviors??) for their lifestyle choices?

This is exactly why the "hate crimes" legislation currently being debated in Congress must not pass! Not only would there be special protections for an aberrant sexual deviancy, but there would be SPECIAL PUNISHMENT(S) FOR THOUGHTS OF THOSE WHO CLAIM THAT HOMOSEXUAL BEHAVIOR IS A SEXUAL DEVIANCY!

On the good news front, Pastor DL Foster has launched his new Gay Christian Movement Watch website!

GCMWatch

You can read more details about GCMWatch here. Also, it is very helpful to read Examining the Gay Christian Movement

Fellow Christian blogger, Neil Simpson has an excellent post up at his Eternity Matters blog.

The Sin of Sodom

I have cross-posted it at my Protect Biblical Marriage blog: Biblical Fallacies of Pro-Gay Theology and have added commentary and additional links on this hotly debated topic.

Hat Tips:

Alliance Defense Fund

Gay Christian Movement Watch

Eternity Matters

Beware The "Fronts" of Radical Islam

Preface: When I joined "Digg" back on June 28, 2007, I naively thought that it might help bring traffic over to this blog. After several weeks of commenting on articles of interest (mostly the conservative, Christian view on issues) I slowly starting getting "fans" of my comments. Then, I found out how to turn "fans" into friends. Then, I learned how to send "shouts" to my friends list. Then, I learned how to submit articles.

At first, I had a little community of conservative and/or Christian friends. But once I started posting comments about the truth of Obama, the ObamaBorgDigg-bots came along and dugg down such comments. I found that many of my fellow conservative/Christian bloggers were getting "dugg down" as well.

It seemed to me, such people were not interested in any kind of rational discussion of the issues. They just hated all conservatives, Christians, John McCain and Sarah Palin supporters.

I was considering leaving the Digg arena. I found nothing but hatred from the liberal left there. I also discovered that the Digg webmasters often censored the conservative Digg posts that were rising in popularity. They even admitted their bias and would often prevent such posts from getting on the front page because of ideological differences. Once again, freedom of speech is censored.

Now, I have a new attitude about it. When I see my comments "dugg down," I view the minus diggs as a joyful celebration. Why? Because what was said obviously irritated the liberal Diggbots!

Take this Digg article and comment thread, for example:

On Obama's Inauguration: Muslims Say, "It's Our Time."

Now, my previous post was an essay on the same article. However, I wanted to show how the "other side" responded to the article and the back and forth comments going on between the ObamaBorg Digg-bots and conservatives/Christians who are trying to educate them away from their Kool-Aid drinking rhetoric.

For the sake of not having to hunt through 53 comments there, here are some of the ones that I was involved in:


Reply to this thread -9 diggs +6 / -15 Christinewjc
on 01/10/2009 Dugg by friends: 4Christ
Look out. Here comes a most "politically incorrect" reaction to this article!

While deciding just what I wanted to write at my blog - Talk Wisdom - prior to posting an excerpt from this WorldNetDaily article, something just "jumped" right into my mind. It was a scene in the movie, "Hook" where Captain Hook (played brilliantly by Dustin Hoffman, btw) asks the seemingly innocent and innocuous questions, "Comfy?" "Cozy?"

That scene had all the makings of someone who is sneaky and tries to appear good, kind, friendly, accommodating, all inclusive, concerned for the welfare (of his victims) and trying to "make nice" in front of them. All the while, we, as the audience, aren't fooled. We are privy to, and instinctively know, Hook's ultimately evil intentions and desires.

Chilling....isn't it?

Read more of "Muslims & Usurper in Chief: It's Our Time?" at:

http://talkwisdom.blogspot.com/2009/01/muslims-usu ...


Excerpt from On Obama's inauguration, Muslims say, 'It's our time'


Chavis Muhammad writes that "with some 1.25 billion Muslims across the globe, the Islamic world couldn't be more excited and anticipatory about the possibility of increased dialogue, understanding and unity that Obama's presidency will undoubtedly bring."

"As an African American Muslim, I can say my prayers were answered when Obama was elected," Chavis Muhammad writes.


Islam? The "religion of peace???" Yeah right. When pigs fly.

Comfy?

Cozy?


That was a portion of my post from yesterday.

Here are some of the responses:


+8 diggs +10 / -2 JenniferInMO
19 hr 14 min ago I don't even know how to address your hate, fear and bigotry. You are long gone.

For those of you just stopping by, the extremists in any religion are dangerous and can be very violent. Islam is no different, neither is Christianity. Islam is a peaceful religion as is Christianity for those who don't buy into the cult versions.

I am sure Muslims are happy about Obama's Presidency. Not because he is a Muslim (which he clearly is not), but because they, as many people do, see Obama as a uniter. They see Obama's Presidency as time when we might all become a little more understanding, tolerant and respectful of each other.

Christine obviously doesn't get it. Rather she chooses to continue spreading lies, hate and fear. That is something I doubt Jesus would do.



My reply:


-7 diggs +3 / -10 Christinewjc
19 hr 3 min ago Dugg by friends: 4Christ
Jennifer wrote:

"I don't even know how to address ..."

Then you shouldn't have!

Obviously, YOU didn't get what my comment and post was actually about. Should I give you a hint?

The appeasement...

Nah...you won't "get it" even then.

JENNIFER chooses to continue spreading lies, hate and fear. That is something I doubt Jesus would do.

Two can play that game...girl.


Then, this guy chimes in:


Thread +5 diggs +7 / -2 StaticThunder
Block User Comment buried! Hide
Is 'StaticThunder' being offensive? Report it
"Christinewjc chooses to continue spreading lies, hate and fear. "

FIFY. No, two people can't play at that game when the facts are you've already lost. You've lost the election and you've lost the ideological battle as your world view is rapidly becoming seen as the dark age throwback it is. Eight years of neocon rule have rendered your cause, your us against evil, with us or against us mentality, impotent.

You're a joke.


Now, I think that the following comment was addressed to my original comment:


Reply to this thread +4 diggs +4 / -0 Tiak
10 hr 29 min ago Did you seriously just imply that a quarter of the world's population are evil because they remind you of a character from a children's story turned movie?... If so, wouldn't Jafar have been a much more obvious choice?...


Notice the progression here? Is it intolerant to point out the naivete of such people?

Then, further down the thread a Digg commenter wrote this:


Echota
21 hr 48 min ago You folk's talk like a bunch of terrorist yourselves.
Right now,you scare me more then any Muslim.
You have to remember these people are your brother's and sister's to!


I replied using God's Word:


Reply to this thread -7 diggs +4 / -11 Christinewjc
18 hr 53 min ago Dugg by friends: 4Christ
Muslims do not worship the same God as Christians and Jews. Please see this post for the proof of this statement:

http://talkwisdom.blogspot.com/2006/01/do-muslims- ...

Echota -

The tolerance that Muslims enjoy in America is not reciprocated in Muslim nations towards Christians or Jews. Have you ever asked yourself, "Why is that?"

Regarding your comment that "these people are your brothers and sisters, too" are you at all familiar with the Bible? What, specifically, did Jesus say when he was told "his family" was outside waiting for him?

Mat 12:46 While he yet talked to the people, behold, [his] mother and his brethren stood without, desiring to speak with him.


Mat 12:47 Then one said unto him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren stand without, desiring to speak with thee.


Mat 12:48 But he answered and said unto him that told him, Who is my mother? and who are my brethren?


Mat 12:49 And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren!


Mat 12:50 For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother.



Obviously, he didn't like that:


Echota
18 hr 38 min ago @Christinewjc....I'm not here to argue the Bible with you,it's not part of my belief to do that...and yes,I was raised in a Christian home so you don't want to go there with me.
You seem to know the scripture so all I'm going to say is Matthew 5:43-48
Peace to you and all mankind in 2009


At this point, I want to back up to a comment given by GlobalRoamer:


GlobalRoamer
on 01/10/2009 Dugg by friends: 4Christ, Janinco
It's Muslims time for what?

Killing homosexuals? That's part of Sharia Law. So it's time to kill homosexuals.
Killing adulterers? That's part of Sharia Law. I committed that sin once. Whoops, I guess I am out of here!

An Afghan family has a daughter who was raped, so they cut her open, removed the baby, at home, and stitched her up.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afg ...

I think it's time for Muslims to start showing their indignation against these kinds of acts of Sharia Law.


My response:


Christinewjc
15 hr 57 min ago Dugg by friends: Janinco
Good (and very sad) points, GlobalRoamer. Wear your "minus" diggs well. It means that the liberal, tolerance-allowed-for-Muslims-only (no matter how much evil they do), ObamaBorg Bots have been irritated by the truth you have shared.


You might be asking, why am I sharing all of this? The reason is because too many people in the United States of America have forgotten the "how," the "why," and especially the "who" reasons for the terrible attack on our nation on September 11, 2001. [Note: if you need a reminder, please see the video "The Path to 9/11"; but even MORE IMPORTANTLY, please see Blocking The Path to 9/11]

Many people have become highly and dangerously complacent regarding the Islamofascist terrorists and their goal of domination (and instilling Sharia law) in the West.

If you need your eyes opened up, please see Maggie's Notebook blog and her post:

Lionheart: The Blind Sheik and Ummah.com - Know your Enemy!

I first heard about Lionheart and his battles against the growing Muslim take-over in the U.K. back in January, 2008, when I posted:

Blogger Arrested: No Free Speech Rights in U.K.

Maggie's Notebook prefaces Lionheart's article:


***Internet Exclusive***

In this post, Lionheart sounds the clarion call to know your enemies. The following reports how online Islamic forums, deemed "moderate" by the British government, were actually set up by Al Qaeda's Abu Hamza al-Masri, also known as the blind sheik - with British tax pounds supporting it - all in the name of tolerance.

Lionheart's friend, Glen Jenvey, was instrumental in bringing Hamza to justice, and discovered Hamza's plan to set up training camps in Oregon. Jenvey, a cyber-terror expert, and a former U.S. espionage agent in Iran, has been featured in prominent television documentaries and Internet films, including Obsession. You'll find a link to his video collection below.


The question is, are there really any "moderate" Muslim organizations? Am I even allowed to ask such a question? Apparently, Lionheart wasn't allowed to even criticize radical Islam in the U.K. last year. Now, we can see the terrible progression and toll that the United Kingdom is suffering. The Islamofascists are wreaking havoc over there - all in "the name of tolerance."

Is such tolerance worth it?

Is it worthwhile?

Or, is it more like the analogy of placing your country (like a frog) into a cold pot of water on the stove - watching the frog slowly get boiled to death sitting in the warm water of complacency?

Lionheart writes:

Ummah.com is one of the biggest, if not the biggest, Moslem online forum in Britain. It promotes itself as being a moderate Islamic forum to the wider British community, who have links with many other Government funded organisations, Islamic and non-Islamic alike.

So while the Government are ploughing millions of pounds of tax payers money into these types of organisations to counteract the militant aspect of the Islamic religion that is now in our midst, these exact same organisations are able to use that money to build their infrastructure, build their Islamic agenda into the public debate, build their base of supporters and then use that power to influence the public debate, mobilise an army of Moslems to support their agenda on our streets to demonstrate against anything they perceive that is contrary to their Islamic religion, or by mass targeted letter writing campaigns to influence institutions and organisations decisions.

British Government funded Al Qaeda terror is being promoted under the guise of counter radicalisation, and claimed to be the moderate face of Islam.

There is no moderate Islam. Islam is Islam and it has two faces.


Read the rest here.

*******
Update at 12:33 p.m. PT:

I have just begun watching a video entitled:

Dispatches - Undercover Mosques

Chilling!

Frightening!

Eye Opening...to say the least!

Hat Tips:

Digg

The Path to 9/11

Blocking The Path to 9/11

Maggies Notebook

Lionheart

A Russian "Prophet?" Don't Think So!

I don't know where to begin! In fact, I couldn't quite make up my mind about the title of this post. I may change it. Anyway, first you may need to read the article: As if Things Weren't Bad Enough, Russian Professor Predicts End of U.S.
In Moscow, Igor Panarin's Forecasts Are All the Rage; America 'Disintegrates' in 2010


What were my first thoughts?

The guy is talking out of both sides of his a**!

Case in point. Read these two paragraphs:

For a decade, Russian academic Igor Panarin has been predicting the U.S. will fall apart in 2010. For most of that time, he admits, few took his argument -- that an economic and moral collapse will trigger a civil war and the eventual breakup of the U.S. -- very seriously. Now he's found an eager audience: Russian state media.


Now read this one:

"There's a 55-45% chance right now that disintegration will occur," he says. "One could rejoice in that process," he adds, poker-faced. "But if we're talking reasonably, it's not the best scenario -- for Russia." Though Russia would become more powerful on the global stage, he says, its economy would suffer because it currently depends heavily on the dollar and on trade with the U.S.


Now...pay special attention to this part:

"Though Russia would become more powerful on the global stage, he says, its economy would suffer because it currently depends heavily on the dollar and on trade with the U.S."


DUH! YA THINK???

My next thought was what a piece of propaganda sh** this guy is selling. (Pardon my asterisks!! )

Then, it hit me. Just like the ObamaBorg Bots who are patrolling the blogs and annoying Conservatives with their pointless drivel (Hmmm...reminds me of someone who often posts here! Hint: His initials are "ST!" - heh heh!) this Russian former KGB thug is utilizing the ole' Saul Alinsky strategy propaganda tool!

Can you pick out how many of the following apply to Panarin's propaganda?

According to Alinsky, the main job of the organizer is to bait an opponent into reacting. “The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength.”

Rule 1: Power is not only what you have, but what an opponent thinks you have. If your organization is small, hide your numbers in the dark and raise a din that will make everyone think you have many more people than you do.

Rule 2: Never go outside the experience of your people.
The result is confusion, fear, and retreat.

Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.

Rule 4: Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. “You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”

Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.

Rule 6: A good tactic is one your people enjoy. “If your people aren’t having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.”

Rule 7: A tactic that drags on for too long becomes a drag. Commitment may become ritualistic as people turn to other issues.

Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage.”

Rule 9: The threat is more terrifying than the thing itself. When Alinsky leaked word that large numbers of poor people were going to tie up the washrooms of O’Hare Airport, Chicago city authorities quickly agreed to act on a longstanding commitment to a ghetto organization. They imagined the mayhem as thousands of passengers poured off airplanes to discover every washroom occupied. Then they imagined the international embarrassment and the damage to the city’s reputation.

Rule 10: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Avoid being trapped by an opponent or an interviewer who says, “Okay, what would you do?”


Wow! Can you believe it? I can FINALLY THANK Obama for something! Turning my eyes towards understanding the mantra of the Marxist/Communist propagandist - Saul Alinsky - so that now I can clearly recognize such trash talk when it is being spewed!!

Hooray! (Mike will be happy to hear this...well...on second thought...NOT!)

I also wanted SO BAD to make fun of the guy's first name...Igor? I know, I know...it's probably as popular as the name "John" is in the U.S. But I can't help think of that movie "Young Frankenstein" whenever I hear about or read that name! Wasn't Marty Feldman's character named Igor?

HT's:

Wall Street Journal.com

FilmSite.org

IMDB.com