Do Not send me this garbage again !
Without using names, I want to share my responses and the responses of the "doubter" of the original email that I sent out.
Up front, I want to say that I don't blame "doubter" one bit for being skeptical about this controversy. Those who have not been made aware of all the lawsuits put forth (with some summarily dismissed) because the Media of Mass Deception refuses to cover any of it, will likely experience shock about these allegations and developments. My purpose for sharing this email conversation (anonymously), is to help educate others who may come here and read - with disbelief - what has been extensively researched by Talk Wisdom and other countless blogs, forums, and online website publishers who are on top of this scandal.
With that said, here is my first response to "doubter's" request to not send "that garbage" via email anymore:
Dear Doubter,
I apologize for sending my previous email. If you had taken the time to read all of it (and the links), you would have discovered that it is not "garbage."
While deciding who to send the email to, I decided to send it to you because you are [deleted for privacy] of an [deleted for privacy]. I had thought that you might be interested in learning the truth about the fraudulent election of Obama. Apparently, I was wrong.
I will delete your email from my address book.
Christine
*******
Reply:
Christine, if all this were true, why isnt the John McCain camp complaining?
They would be the first ones, believe me.
Not necessarily. If you recall, John McCain's birth place was up for scrutiny earlier in the campaign season.
Here is an article that discusses the agreement made in Congress about "natural born citizen" status:
The NEIN Blog: A Wider Conspiracy
Carefully read about Senate Resolution 511:
Senate Resolution 511
Then, go back to the NEIN blog link and read the rest of the post.
Note this VERY important conclusion:
The Senate may have passed S. Res. 511, by "Unanimous Consent" on 30 APRIL 2008 but that does not make it binding federal law. As detailed under the definition of a "Simple Resolution" on the Senate.Gov website:
"Simple resolutions do not require the approval of the other house nor the signature of the President, and they do not have the force of law."
In fact, the Donofrio lawsuit also questions John McCain's status as a "natural born citizen" in it! This may be why his campaign has not pursued the issue with Obama.
John McCain's "natural born citizen" status is genuine - as per what is written in the Constitution and Resolution 511. Therefore, he has already been PROVEN to be eligible for POTUS. He may not be speaking out for hundreds of reasons - one being the fact that his status was previously questioned and he didn't want Obama to go through the same type of scrutiny.
However, the evidence is piling up against Obama's "natural born citizen"
status.
As far as the media is concerned, they are NOT going to share anything negative about Obama (just like they avoided doing so during the campaign.) If the SCOTUS "secret conference" decides (only needs 4 votes) to listen to full-fledged arguments regarding the Donofrio lawsuit, then the media might then be forced to report it.
Another reason why the media doesn't want to report this issue is because of the riots that would likely occur if Obama is found ineligible.
Another reason is because even Fox News is 6% owned by a Saudi billionaire named AlWaleed. He has actively kept the rhetoric on Fox News toned down regarding any Muslim issues. For example, when the Paris car burnings happened by "Muslim youths," he told Fox News not to identify them as "Muslims." As a share holder in the company, Fox News was forced to comply and retract that statement. They then labeled it "youth riots."
Here is a link to a U.K. article about AlWaleed and Fox News:
UK Media: NewsCorporation - Rupert Murdoch
I realize that this all sounds like a wild and crazy conspiracy...but maybe,
just maybe...it really is!
Here is a link to a 90 minute blog radio broadcast that shares details about the Obama birth certificate silence by the media:
Political Pistachio: Why Is Obama's Birth Certificate Still An Issue? Why does the media not report on the lawsuits regarding the Issue?
Lastly, I want to commend you for posting on your blog to "pray for
President-elect Obama." We need to pray for the truth to come out! If he IS GENUINELY a natural born citizen (which he can easily prove by showing his vault length COLB to the U.S. Supreme Court and to the public), then he should be our president. If he is NOT a natural born citizen, then I think that it is VITAL that our U.S. Constitution be upheld and that the electors be forbidden to cast their votes for him.
Thanks for being willing to at least read all of this.
God bless you.
Christine
Reply:
You mentioned that I am an [deleted for privacy]. I want to point out that, as [deleted for privacy] I try to get the facts. Please visit this site
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html
I didnt ask to be taken off your list, by the way.
*******
Hi again Doubter,
OK good. I won't take you off of my email list. Sorry for incorrectly
identifying you as [deleted for privacy]!
In my research, I have found that Factcheck.org is a left-leaning organization - owned by Annenberg - which is linked to the Obama campaign, too. They have put up the Birth Certificate from Hawaii as "proof" that Obama was born in Hawaii. The fact is, many tech-savvy people have examined that certificate and have found it to be a forgery.
The same can be said for Snopes.com (I used to rely on them myself). They have been honest about many of the email hoaxes, but I also found out that they skew the evidence regarding Obama in his favor, just like the rest of the leftist media.
What many people want to see is Obama's vault-length COLB. It is the one with more details - like hospital, doctor of delivery, father and mother's occupation, etc. It is different from the one that has been posted online.
One more thing to consider. When the forged birth certificate surfaced on the Obama "fight the smears" website, many investigators noticed abnormalities about it. It is assumed that it was actually a "doctored" copy of Obama's sister's Hawaii COLB. Others have stated that back in 1963, an African American baby would not have been labeled as "African" on his/her birth certificate. It would have read "negro" or "colored."
The bottom line is this. If Obama would produce his vault-length COLB to the U.S. Supreme Court and to the public, then all of this would go away.
Why hasn't he done this? That's the question on everyone's mind. It is highly suspicious that NO ONE has seen it! No judge, no American citizen - not one of us ordinary American citizens who have the absolute right to know whether or not Obama is genuinely a natural born citizen of the United States - which is a requirement in our U.S. Constitution.
Doubter, one of the reasons why I am continuing to pursue this issue is because of the reason why the Founding Fathers wrote "natural born citizenship" status as a necessity for POTUS (note: a "naturalized citizen can be a senator (like Obama if that is what he really is) or governor - (like Arnold Schwarteneggar of CA).
These are comments copied from this link:
The Wider Conspiracy
"There is an immensely important reason why our Founding Fathers put
"natural born citizen" status as a prerequisite for POTUS. They intellectually surmised that one day, a person might run for POTUS with secret loyalty to another nation which could put our nation in jeopardy."
My blogging friend Sean over at the NEIN blog added this:
Nailed it! I think every Citizen of the United States should at least once in
his or her life pay a visit to Colonial Williamsburg, Virginia. Perhaps even
twice. On the tour you will learn the basis for the "natural born citizen" clause.
What I was previously unaware of until a recent visit to Williamsburg was that the ultimate basis for this belief was the pre-existing fear-based rivalry between the British throne and the Papacy - which is to say between the Church of England and the Roman Holy See & the Pope - and it had everything to do with the fear of a leader with real or imagined loyalties to a foreign king. It even goes further back than that to Imperial Rome and the new Christians whose loyalty was to the Messiah King, Jesus Christ. This was translated or transmutated over time to earthly realms of kings, princes and principalities, and it still a fact to this day, and will be a fact during the reign of the future antichrist. It is the core of the conflict between Judeo-Christianity and Islam, the real God vs. false god core issue. But I digress...
Did you know this sense continued in America right on up to President J. F. Kennedy? That's right, no Catholic had been elected President until JFK was elected because of the long-standing fear that a Catholic believer would be ultimately loyal to the Pope before and above the Constitution of the United States. This is the basis for the "natural born citizen" clause. And it took a trip to Colonial Williamsburg just last summer for me to learn this important bit of American history.
Good work bringing this point up Christine, and thank you for reminding me about it.
Now we're worried about a likely POTUS who has not so much a loyalty to a foreign king, but loyalty and an agenda tied to a foreign ideology - an
antithesis ideology - to that which has been uniquely American since the
founding of this Republic. That is the core issue in a nutshell, and this is why I had to return to this comment.
end of copied comments
*******
Doubter, I am worried about two things. I am worried that Obama will be found ineligible to be POTUS and the riots across America would be like none we have ever seen. Secondly, I am extremely worried that if Obama takes office, our nation could be in deep trouble. Thus, I pray for God's direction and mercy no matter what happens.
Thanks again for reading,
Christine
*******
Response:
I know what you are saying here, however, the main stream media never picked this up. I was thinking, if there is a big story there, they would jump on it.
*******
Ultimately, December 1, 2008 and December 5, 2008 will be significant days concerning two lawsuits.
Please see Texas Darlin blog too. Check out the many posts on this topic.
As commenter "Ted" in the comment section of my previous blogpost said, you really should listen to this Blog Radio broadcast over at Political Pistachio: Why Is Obama's Birth Certificate Still An Issue? Why Does the Media Not Report on the Lawsuits Concerning the Issue?
Lastly, I discovered the following article today.
The Great Birth Certificate Scandal Cover Up Of The 2008 Election
*******
Update 11/23/08 @ 10:28 a.m. PT
If you want to see the absolute SMOKING GUN SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE that the Barack Hussein Obama birth certificate being passed off on the Internet as "real" on sites such as "Kos," "Factcheck.org," "Snopes," and "fight the smears" websites, please see the EXTENSIVE RESEARCH DONE BY RON POLARIK OVER AT HIS BLOG ON TOWNHALL.COM!
FYI: The page may take some time to load because it is filled with image comparisons that will demonstrate the PROOF that the Obama birth certificate is a FORGERY!
Additional Note: When you click on the link above, you will need to scroll down a bit to begin reading/viewing the post.
*******
Update: 11/24/08 at 9:23 a.m. PT
Just found this message forum that has lots of information and links (including several that I have already posted at Talk Wisdom) about the Obama birth certificate controversy and the U.S. Supreme Court cases coming up in December:
U.S. Supreme Court to Review Challenge of Barack Obama’s Citizenship