Showing posts with label delusional lefties. Show all posts
Showing posts with label delusional lefties. Show all posts

News Roundup

Is your head shaking in disbelief from what is going on in Washington D.C.?? Mine certainly is! Just when I thought Obamafraudland couldn't make anything worse, I find out more than I want to know about the continual corruption and purposeful destruction that Obummer and the evil Dems are heaping upon the American people. If you have your head in the sand and aren't paying attention to all the bad news, SHAME ON YOU! I think that it is your patriotic duty to know what is going on and when appropriate, DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!


First, a mini news roundup. Next, an email letter to share.

posted by Jim Hoft at The Gateway Pundit - 3 hours ago
The Club for Growth released this video showing 20 sitting Democrats saying they supported a balanced budget. They don’t. They lied. Senate democrats this morning rejected the House budget that included a ...

Democrats lying? So...what else is new?

posted by William A. Jacobson at Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion - 5 hours ago
The Senate, on a motion to table brought by Harry Reid, just killed the Cut, Cap & Balance Bill passed in the House without any floor debate. Unlike a motion for cloture, which would have required a day of...
If you thought that the Progressive Dems in the Senate and Obama weren't in cahoots to intentionally destroy the Capitalism system of our Constitutional Republic known as the United States of America, then perhaps Harry ReiDUNCE's antics here might finally change your mind!

I really think that the Dems and Obama KNOW that they are going to lose in 2012 - and LOSE BIG - because of all the failed policies, the corruption, the overwhelmingly unnecessary spending, and the refusal to abandon their ill-gotten, crazy lunatic ways!!  THE WRITING IS ON THE WALL KIDS!!  If we can just get through all the muck they put us in and make it to the next election - then we will once again be on the RIGHT TRACK with a Conservative Republican president, Republican Conservative House majority, and Republican Senate majority to undo all of the terrible legislation that the Obamabots have wreaked upon our nation and people!

And, in "the most ridiculous poll category, read Gateway Pundit's post:

Excerpt:

In May Barack Obama urged Israel to hand over half of Jerusalem, the Wailing Wall, The Temple Mount, Old Jerusalem, and the tomb of Jesus Christ to the Hamas-Fatah terrorist alliance.
A recent J-Street poll suggests that a majority of American Jews support Obama’s plan to hand over the Holy Land to the Hamas-Fatah Alliance.
By the way… George Soros funds J-Street.

Jimmy T sums up this stupid notion quite well:



#3 July 22, 2011 at 8:38 am
JimmyT commented:
I used to work for a Jewish family in one of their businesses. I know many Jews through this connection. Most voted for bambi. NOW, it’s anybody but bambi for them. They don’t want their sacred sites turned over and despise bambi for ever proposing it. Most all of their friends and family feel the same way. People can make a poll say whatever they want depending on the question and how it’s framed. I don’t believe a word of this from this Soros backed group.

The next time you hear ObamaLiar claiming that "most Americans agree with him," you will now know that he is OUTWARDLY LYING TO YOU!! Take a look at this post:

posted by Jim Hoft at The Gateway Pundit - 20 hours ago
The American people are sold. Today, CNN released a poll showing that Americans overwhelmingly support the Republicans’ Cut, Cap, and Balance plan Poor Richard’s News reported: Via CNN: In another proposal...

While we are on the subject of Progressive Dems trying to destroy America, Trevor Loudon reveals that they are attempting to destroy Israel as well!!

The Plan to Destroy Israel's Economy: A Must View for all Friends of Freedom

I could post dozens more links to important blog posts, but let me end with an email I recently received that gives us an idea for WHAT WE CAN DO ABOUT THIS DEBT CRISIS DEBACLE and all of the grievances we have against the self-declared tyrant - "king" Obama!!

Christine,

The events of the past few days once again show how self-
absorbed and self-promotional President Obama can be, even
during a time of national emergency.

The man who has personally contributed more to the
overwhelming financial crisis gripping our nation than
any other president or elected official has refused to
support a balanced budget amendment - even shamelessly
using the Constitution to try to defend his indefensible
position!

This from a president whose actions have continually
subverted and manipulated the Constitution to advance
his overtly socialist political agenda.


That's why next Thursday, Liberty Counsel is sending our 23
specific grievances to the President (a man who operates
more like a modern-day King George III than an elected official
bound by an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United
States!) and many other elected and unelected officials.
These 23 grievances are at the heart of our powerful
"Declaration of Independence 2011."

We will deliver this document with its list of specific
grievances to the Obama administration, Congress, and
other bureaucrats who need to get the message that in
America, we don't tolerate tyrants! Please go here now
to read the full document and be included in this very
important delivery:

Liberty Action.org Petition

++Our grievances against King Barack Obama.

Here are just a few of the 23 grievances we are filing against
King Obama and the left-wing, elitist political class that
supports him and are bent on destroying our nation:

Barack Obama and his administration have...

Fraudulently installed a national health care system
against the will of the people, on its face an example
of illegal wealth distribution, while repeatedly
violating the Constitution in doing so...

Squandered the nation's resources, creating
insurmountable public debt...

Enacted an administrative measure forcing American
tax payers to pay for abortions in foreign nations...

Promoted same-sex "marriage" against the will of the
majority of Americans, advanced same-sex adoption, and
directed an arbitrary policy shift to normalize same-sex
relations in the United States armed forces...

Engaged in several "world tours" to apologize for
America, bowing to foreign tyrants...

And appointed any number of extra-constitutional,
unelected and unaccountable executive "czars."

These are just a few of the egregious violations listed in
the "Declaration of Independence 2011" that expose the
specific ways in which the Obama administration has
subverted and bypassed the Constitution of the United
States of America.

These grievances are so severe that we felt duty-bound as
a public interest law firm to re-cast what is widely
considered to be the most important single document in
American history - the Declaration of Independence - in
today's setting, reflecting the political and governmental
situation we face today.

We need YOUR signature on this Declaration (which
was known as a "bill of particulars" at the hour of
our nation's founding) before we deliver it next
Thursday. Click here to read the entire document and
to sign our comprehensive "Declaration of Independence
2011":

Liberty Counsel is rallying tens of thousands of Americans
to join together and send a clear message that WE WILL NOT
SUBMIT to out-of-touch elected officials who ignore the
clear will of the American people!

In just a few days, we have already enrolled tens of
thousands of concerned Americans in this powerful statement
of discontent with what is happening - not in 1776, but
right now in the summer of 2011!
Proclaim YOUR stand against tyranny! We want to tell the
President, his administration, the media, our elected
representatives, government bureaucrats, and whoever else
needs to hear about it, that patriotic Americans REFUSE
to stand by while leftists take our nation apart, plank
by plank!

This is a citizen action that every freedom-loving American
should take! Now more than ever, the enemies of true liberty
need to know that those of us who love liberty have not
given up!

THANK YOU for all you do, and have done, as a key member of
the Liberty Counsel team!

Mathew Staver, Founder and Chairman
Liberty Counsel

P.S. Tell King Obama that you agree with the 23 specific
grievances listed in the Declaration. Together, we can
stop the deceit and tyranny of the current regime! Please
join me in signing Liberty Counsel's "Declaration of
Independence 2011."


I signed it...DID YOU??

Who Will Be Blamed For Gov. Shut Down?

If the Democrats think that the Republicans might be blamed for the possible shut down of the government, they need their heads examined! I do not even think that the media of mass deception will be able to spin this one. Take a look at the poll results (so far, as of 7:13 a.m. PT) over at Fox News:

America's Newsroom Poll
In case of a government shutdown – who’s to blame?
Republicans

Democrats

Both

Neither



America's Newsroom Poll
Thank you for voting!
************************************
RESULTS SO FAR  (as of 7:13 a.m. PT):

Republicans                          1.16%

Democrats     93.8%

Both                                     4.86%

Neither                                 0.18%

Go vote! Fox News.com

Poll Update @ 10:11 a.m. PT:

America's Newsroom Poll
In case of a government shutdown – who’s to blame?

Republicans
0.86%   (30 votes)

Democrats
93.19% (3,256 votes)

 Both
5.84%   (204 votes)

Neither
0.11%   (4 votes)

*******
Update:

Just in case you need more proof of the conniving spin that Democrats in the Senate want to place on the current budget battle, read this email that I received yesterday:

Hat Tip:

MRC Action
From the Desk of:
David Martin, Executive Vice President
Media Research Center

4/5/2011

Christine,

Last week, microphones caught left-wing Sen. Chuck Schumer giving marching orders to other Senators on how to best attack fiscal conservatives.

Laying the groundwork to blame Conservatives for any impasse in the ongoing budget fight, Schumer said it was important to describe as "extremist" any proposed budget cuts and the fiscal conservatives pushing them.

Schumer's underhanded tactics and bravado about defying the will of the voters are due in large part to his knowledge that the Obama-aligned media will protect him and his tax-and-spend liberal cronies.

Any doubt about the slavish relationship that the media have with Washington, DC leftists can be put to rest, as all three networks chose to ignore this major gaffe by a leading DC liberal.

Media Research Center Founder Brent Bozell discussed this during his appearance on Friday's "Fox & Friends". Click to watch the segment and to take action to break the "unholy" alliance that exists between President Obama and the liberal media.


+ + Budget Showdown Demands Your Attention!

Christine, Schumer's unwitting comments exposed the liberals' budget strategy. This isn't about deficits or the burdens that they place on our children and grandchildren. This is about power. Chuck Schumer and his friends in the liberal media would rather turn our country into an economic basketcase than allow conservatives to successfully cut spending.

Liberals like Schumer know the media are on their side. They know that even when opposing baby steps towards fiscal sanity, their hatchet-men in the liberal media will defend them while rushing to blame Tea Party Conservatives for their "extremism."

As liberty-loving Americans, we must be aware of what is taking place between the media and liberals in Congress and respond with solidarity and strength!

That's why the MRC has marshaled its bias-fighting resources to expose, neutralize and break the Obama-media alliance. But, we need to quickly build a coalition of citizen activists who are willing to work with us to break this radical leftist scheme!

Go here now to watch Brent's Fox News interview and to take action with the MRC by adding your name to our important petition demanding the media end their unhealthy and dangerous partnership with Obama and his leftist cohorts.

David Martin

DWTS - Losing Its Class and Grace

Hi friends. My apologies for not consistently posting lately. Yesterday, my morning started out crazy and remained so for most of the day! When I got out of the shower, the roofers (getting our roof repaired all week) were banging on the roof, the dogs were barking hysterically, the phone was ringing, my husband was texting me on my cell phone, and my Mom was hungry for her breakfast!

I literally did not sit down but twice during the day. At 2:00 p.m. to watch The Glenn Beck show, and then again at 8:00 p.m. to watch Dancing With The Stars.

DWTS has been one of my favorite shows. However, something happened towards the end of the show last night that I found ungraceful, un-classy, and very disappointing.

Gateway Pundit has the story and the video.

The question is:

Did Sarah Palin get booed on Dancing With the Stars last night? Some people think so.


There is a debate going on in the comment section regarding what, or whom, the "boos" were directed towards. The trouble is, during the re-broadcast, the booing could have been suppressed. It was left in there on purpose.

The one show on television that I always thought was one that demonstrated class and elegance is being tarnished. The first disappointment was the need to bleep out Brandy's curse words. How sad that a beautiful singing star has such a foul mouth that she can't even control it while appearing and performing dances on a national T.V. show!

The second disappointment was what definitely appeared to be booing from some in the crowd right before Sarah Palin, who was there as a member of the audience to support her daughter Bristol's performance, was briefly interviewed by the host of the show. Young Piper was sitting next to her mother in support of her older sister. But the booing libtards didn't care to think how that young child might feel about their rude, arrogant, and unnecessary disparagement.

My comment at Gateway:

When a mom who happens to be famous and loved by many – yet hated by some in the public who disagree with her politics - appears at an event to support her daughter, I would have thought that even the most rabid leftists would be gracious and not boo. But I was wrong. The type of persons who would boo a person like that on national T.V. during a pleasant dancing competition are despicable – to say the least.

I was in the audience of DWTS a few years ago and we were encouraged to dress nicely and be polite. There were people introduced in the audience who I didn’t like and disagreed with politically, but I would NEVER have booed them during the taping of the show.

If those boos were aimed at Sarah Palin (and I think they were – like Bailey wrote, “There was way too much time between the scores and the boos.”) then someone involved in the show needs to apologize for it next week.

However, it appears that the execs at ABC are not willing to offer an apology to Gov. Palin for the disgraceful attitude of some in the audience. They hid behind their desks and lied about it.

The slogan at ABC is “a new kind of family.” Apparently, that means a rejection of normal conservative families like the Palins and the embrace of the rude, bombastic, rabid, liberal leftist lunatic fringe types as this new kind of “family.” How sad and tragic.

Hat Tip:

Gateway Pundit

*******

Update:

Added comment at Gateway:

curth
September 28th, 2010 | 11:51 am | #29
It’s been debunked both by ABC and the shows host, Tom Bergeron. The boos were not for Sarah. In fact , if you watched it, you can see and hear that when Bergeron introduces her, there is cheering and applause and lots of smiling faces in the audience. I bet it gets debunked this on evening’s show as well.

Just because some of the fringe left loons wish and say something is so, it doesn’t mean it is. Another failure.


My reply:

Christinewjc
September 28th, 2010 | 12:28 pm | #31
Curth,

I have been at a taping of the show. Things can be manipulated. For instance, the performances by musical guests are usually taped first and presented on T.V. later in the show.

It is possible that the audience was told not to boo (again) before the interview was done. The only way to know for sure is to ask people who were actually there in the audience.

Next, I went over to The Daily Beast link (above) and read this:

pludger
Actually, YOU'RE wrong. Audience members report they were booing Palin, but the network put out the fire by saying it was over scores. Firsthand, eyewitness accounts from those who were actually there say that it was totally an anti-Palin boo...


[Note: Most of the comments about Sarah and her family at the aptly named "Daily Beast" site are not very kind to the Palins.]

That Whitey Obama!


Well...according to his heredity, he has more white ancestry in him than black! Am I in trouble now? Did that title anger anyone? Did that title offend anyone? Am I a racist for labeling Obama a "whitey"? Why did I write this? Why the sudden outburst?

As the cartoon character named Charlie Brown (Note: not being racist...that was his last name!) regularly stated when he was completely exasperated:

AAARRGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!!

My mind just cannot take the race baiting crap being bantered about in the media anymore!!! I've had it!!

I don't hate Obama.

I hate his POLICIES!

Hating a person's terrible policies have nothing to do with the race of the man!

But progressive lefties have to fall back on something to hurt the TEA Party movement because they cannot win the arguments against their dangerous policial agenda that MOST AMERICANS DO NOT WANT!!

Thus, the false, made-up and stupid calls of "racism" apparently work better for the lousy Congresspeople and their lapdog media creeps (paging Keith Olberdummy???) than for them to actually have to face the TRUTH OF THE MATTER! These people will fall back on their own swords of idiotic, dangerous, expensive, life-denying, evil, hate-mongering policies that goes on in their lunatic anti-Christian, anti-Capitalist, anti-Republic, anti-U. S. Constititution, anti-business, and anti-conservative minds!! Liberalism is a mental disorder and progressivism is head-exploding worse!

The destructive goals of these people will irreparably harm America if we don't counter their sick and twisted efforts towards Marxism!!! Americans are tired of the lies, cheating, scandals, corruption, bribing, illegal activity and most of all - seeing these criminals getting away with it!!

Don't fall for their propaganda.

Common sense will win the day in the end.

These progressive Communists will undo themselves!! They have been found out!

And the first wave of undoing will happen in November, 2010 when the worst Congress in American history is booted out on their arses!!!

Ahhh... I feel better now. Just had to get out some frustration this morning. Will now return to your regularly scheduled Talk Wisdom blog posts.

*******

Also see:

The Steady Drip: Media Maligns TEA Party Movement - Study by Media Research Center

Newsmax: Study: Networks Snub, Malign Tea Party Movement

I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix): Blacks At TEA Parties

Lloyd Marcus: Black Dem Race Exploiters Trash Tea Party

Caos Blog: beware the marxist infiltraters at the tea party protests

President Appeaser's Playground Mentality


Correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't seem to recall President George W. Bush lashing out against critics in the media. The Media of Mass Deception constantly disparaged, insulted, ridiculed, debased, and lied about President Bush and his policies practically every day while he was in office. President Bush was the type of man who ignored the vitriol against him and did his job as Commander in Chief. He kept us safe for seven years after the 9/11 attacks.

Obama? Not so much. We have already had four attacks (one was thankfully thwarted - the Christmas Day pantywaist bomber) here on U.S. soil, and with Obama's naive foreign policy, he's rolling out the red (how apropos for the Marxist!!) carpet; encouraging rogue nations to attack us because "we won't retaliate with nuclear weapons."

What kind of fool tells the enemy the strategy we have planned to keep this nation safe? Answer: NONE!! Even a fool knows not to show his hand in such a way. This clown Resident of the White House and his loony commie advisers are placing America in grave danger. It's like having middle school level children running the country. And, when someone like Sarah Palin legitimately criticizes their stupid policies, the bogus POTUS answers back like a dumb-ass nincompoop!

Despite the seriousness of the nuclear appeasement mistke by ObaMAO, it's comic relief to read Gateway Pundit's post:

It’s On… President Appeaser Lashes Out at Sarah Palin

The comments are hilarious, too! These are some of my favorites:

AuntieMadder
April 8th, 2010 6:53 pm #2
Snippy little b!tch today, wasn’t he? Must have been way past time for a nicotene fix.

*******

bill-tb
April 8th, 2010 6:53 pm #3
She does appear to be a tad bit smarter than you, sir.

*******

Chisum
April 8th, 2010 6:54 pm #4
Oh boy, The Won must be feeling a bit threatened by Sarah.

I guess it’s because she’s so dumb. And he’s so freakin’ brilliant.

Just ask him.

*******

MAJ Mike
April 8th, 2010 6:55 pm #5
Exactly what makes THE WON any more of a nuclear warfare expert than Ms. Palin?

Hell, the Nuclear Weapons Targeting Courses I took for the Infantry Officer Advanced Course, Field Artillery Officer Advanced Course, and the Command and General Staff Officers College make me a more highly trained Atomic Weaponeer than THE WON.

*******


exceller
April 8th, 2010 7:12 pm #13
This week alone should leave no doubt in anyones mind that our president is a madman.
Three mindless, nonsensical and dangerous acts.
- Removing “Islam” from the foreign policy publications.
- The retarded change in our nuclear stance.
- The empty treaty with Russia on Nukes.

All three of these actions weaken America’s standing in the world.

*******

jetstream
April 8th, 2010 7:16 pm #14
As usual, the strawman argument is put forth to deflect from the true issue.

Strawman: expertise/knowledge of nuclear issues

True Issue: defense strategy

*******

Dipso Facto
April 8th, 2010 7:18 pm #19
Boy, this really makes Obama look petty and whiny.

The president of the United States saying, “The last time I checked” like a teenage girl.

What a dope. His mouth is his own worst enemy.

*******

OverTheCoastline
April 8th, 2010 7:18 pm #20
Bad move, Mr. President. Calling out Sarah Palin – - much like your attempts to lash out at Rush Limbaugh and Fox News – - only makes you look foolish, unfocused and floundering.

*******

Deana
April 8th, 2010 7:19 pm #21
I see others have had the same thought I do: After the news that has come out over the past couple of days, no one in their right mind would ever accuse Obama of being an expert on nuclear issues.

This man is so . . . strange. What is it about him that he constantly has to pick on people by name? I’m sure ever president has felt like responding directly to critics but I simply cannot recall any other president EVER picking people out by name and being harsh in his response to them.



Yep!!

Added a bit late, but this one is just too funny not to include!

zefal April 8th, 2010 8:34 pm #81
He plans on defending each one of the 57 states by placing joe biden look-a-like scarecrows in each one. If that doesn’t work he’ll go nuclear and place nancy pelosi scarecrows. Last resort: thermonuclear with barney frank ones.




Ha!!

Hat Tip:

Gateway Pundit

Best Explanation of What Is Happening in America Today

At the following link, there are two videos where David Horowitz and Democrat Pat Caddell Explain the Radical Take-over of the US. Must View!!! These are MUST VIEW VIDEOS!

From New Zeal:

The best explanation of what is happening to America that I have yet seen.

This doesn't go far enough and misses the role of the Communist Party USA, Democratic Socialists of America, Institute of Policy Studies, Demos etc, but very good none the less.


[Note: Go to link above to view videos.]


Hat Tip:

New Zeal Blog

Couldn't Have Said it Better!


While catching up on my blog reading this morning, the following letter that was found over at /RepubX - Defend Our Freedoms blog: A Nebraska doctor’s message for Ben Nelson needs to go viral! I hope that you will pick it up, paste it into an email and send it to everyone you know; and/or post it on your own blog, or include it on the front page of your website so that more people can see a perfect example of the anger that is occurring among millions of people across this nation because of the back door deals, extortion, bribery and stealing of the American taxpayers' money in order to pass this horrendous HELLSCARE bill in the Senate!

From Blogsphere:

Dr. Becky Hollibaugh of Friend, Nebraska e-mailed me her message for sellout Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) this morning:

Hello Michelle:
I’m a family practice doctor in Nebraska. I sent the following (angry,I admit) letter to Senator Nelson. I urge your readers (from Nebraska and elsewhere) to do likewise, in their own words!

Dear Senator Nelson:

I send this message under “Tort Reform” because the current monstrosity you have pledged your support to says nothing whatsoever about Tort Reform. You have sold the physicians of Nebraska for zilch (zilch for us, but beau coup federal bucks for you and the liberal partisans in this state). As a family practice physician in Small Town, Nebraska, I was counting on you to be the lone voice of Democratic sanity on this issue, but you sold me out. I will dedicate every spare minute of my time and every spare dollar I have to defeating you, should you run for re-election. The long hours I spent on my medical education and the long hours I spend treating my patients are nothing but chump change to you and your Democrat colleagues in Washington. I especially can’t wait for your equivocation and milquetoast evasion when your “compromises” on the abortion language in the bill are silently erased or quietly (on-little-legislative-cat’s-feet) eviscerated in the House/Senate give-and-take. Go on: Bet me that you won’t wuss-out on this issue!

I know you won’t give two-seconds to this letter, but I had to write it. I’m a primary care doctor in YOUR state, and you sold me out. I didn’t slog through 4 years of college and 4 years of medical school and 3 years of residency just to have you hand my career and my patient/doctor relationships over to government lifers. Your gutless acquiescence to Obama and Harry Reid and ‘Nanny’ Pelosi will NOT be forgotten.

Thank you, Ben, for forcing doctors like me to earn less than the repairmen who fix our appliances. Case in point: We recently had our dishwasher fixed. The repairman who came to our house charged $65 just to come and ‘diagnose’ the problem, then charged another $180 to ‘fix’ the problem. You and your fellow lawmakers have fixed MY going rate (Medicare) at $35 per-visit. Thank you for securing such a ‘lucrative’ rate for me! Thank you so much for making me–someone with 8 years of education!–make less than a mechanic or appliance repair technician. And thanks especially for falling in line with Obama and the rest of the Democrats to make such a socialist system permanent.

You have my disgust and disdain forever, you socialist-coddling coward.

Sincerely,
Becky F. Hollibaugh, D.O.
Warren Memorial Hospital
Zimmerman Clinic
Friend, NE 68359

Let's support Becky. Send her a note or card and just say thank you and that you want to help her. Send your email so she can reach you. Find out were you can send a dollar, five or twenty to help defeat Nelson. Let's show the 100 Senators that no longer will we let them have a country club life of dinners, travel, power, money and fame. The good life is over. From now on they run and get elected to make America better, not line their own states pockets. Senators above all should be for all the people.


It's time to make a difference.

Desert Cactus


Great comment over at RepubX too:


Be it known, America, there are no "compromises", "negotiations", "political deals" et.al there are only bribes, graft, fraud and corruption for each and every vote that passes these bills: health care, cap & trade, stimulus - you name it.

Every representative who voted yes has been bribed for a vote and every representative who stood by and watched it happen without notifying the media of the details of said bribes & indiscretions, are complicit.

Vote these people out - they no longer represent America and the foundations of freedom, individual freedom, free choice and the pursuit of happiness - they only seek wealth building off the backs of other Americans.

Question the patriotism of EVERY representative! They have spat in our faces and no longer show themselves as Americans.


ICONIC FREEDOM


2010 - VOTE THE BUMS OUT!

I have also been made aware of another great grassroots movements (besides the TEA Party Movement) called GOOOH!

"GOOH" stands for:

Get
Out
Of
Our
House

"If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin." Samuel Adams, 1776


Such a time is NOW!! PEOPLE!!!


Hat Tips:

RepubX - Defend Our Freedoms blog

GOOOH.com: Get Out Of Our House!

Two Examples: Homosexual Behavior Destroys Lives

There is a lot of ugly information coming out about Obama's horrible choice for "safe school czar" - Kevin Jennings. When you go to the link, have a barf bag ready. It is all quite sickening...to say the least! [WARNING! VERY GRAPHIC CONTENT at the link below! Don't claim I didn't warn you.]

Big Government: Fistgate - Barack Obama's "Safe Schools Czar's 2000 Conference Promoted Fisting to 14-year-olds.

That title alone is enough to turn your stomach! Such depravity...

In a somewhat related matter (additionally despicable topic but thankfully not as graphic), GMPilot continues to make an issue of the church cover-ups regarding homosexuality in the priesthood of the Catholic Church. In a thread at my message board that was started a few years ago (and has 1,152 views), GMPilot recently added the following:

News of the Weak(land)

There’s been no church cover-up news in a while now, but this one comes just in time for Christmas.

From the Journal Sentinel, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 03 Dec 2009:


Quote:
Weakland shredded copies of sex abuse reports, documents say
By Bruce Vielmetti of the Journal Sentinel
Posted: Dec. 3, 2009

Former Milwaukee Archbishop Rembert Weakland routinely shredded copies of weekly reports about sexual abuse by priests, according to formerly sealed testimony turned over to Milwaukee County's district attorney on Thursday.

In a 1993 deposition, Weakland admitted destroying copies of the reports in his office, according to a partial transcript of the deposition released by Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests.

Peter Isely, SNAP's Midwest director, turned over the partial transcript, as well as portions of the logs to which Weakland was referring, to Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm and asked him to review them for any possible criminal violations. Chisholm accepted the records and promised a thorough review.

The 16-year-old deposition documents have come to light during the discovery process in more than a dozen civil fraud lawsuits filed against the Milwaukee archdiocese.

SNAP made the announcements at a news conference Thursday morning outside Chisholm's office at the Milwaukee County courts complex.

Julie Wolf, communications director for the Archdiocese of Milwaukee, said Thursday she had not seen the documents SNAP released and could make no comment on them for the archdiocese.

In the deposition, Weakland explains that he got copies of the weekly logs made by vicars in the archdiocese about ongoing problem priests. He said he would read them, then shred them because he didn't want to keep them in his office. He would "try to remember anything that is quite serious and important," and later discuss the matters with the vicar.

SNAP also released portions of logs kept on two abusive priests, Siegfried Widera and Franklyn Becker. Widera killed himself in 2003 after police cornered him in Mexico; Becker has been removed from the priesthood. Isely said not all portions of all vicar logs have been released yet as part of the civil litigation.

Isely said SNAP also will ask Archbishop-designate Jerome Listecki to censure and discipline Weakland and anyone else who may have been involved in covering up sex abuse by clergy. He said Listecki has refused to say whether he would review why the Diocese of La Crosse, where he is bishop, has cleared more clergy accused of abuse than most dioceses.

Listecki told Wisconsin Public Radio that he did not have enough time left in his term as bishop in La Crosse and that, besides, it was the holiday season.


A picture of the alleged representative of Christ may be found at http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/78431087.html


My response:

The difference between playing "church" rather than being of the Church of Christ:

What makes you think that the people involved in such cover-up, corruption, and/or sexual misconduct are genuine followers of Jesus Christ?

"Church" cover-up of the type you are describing is limited to, and representative of, the human side of the equation. The church of Jesus Christ (all genuine saved believers) are on the side of God, His written Word the Bible, and His Living Word - Jesus Christ.

I can tell you with 99% certainty that the "alleged representative of Christ" is more like a MIS-REPRESENTATIVE of Christ. The 1% is there in case the pseudo archbishop repents - which we all must do.
__________________
See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ. Colossians 2:8

The eyes of the Lord move to and fro throughout the earth to show Himself strong to those whose hearts are fully committed to Him. 2 Chronicles 16:9

*******

Thoughts, comments and questions from readers on either of these two stories are welcomed in the comment section.

Whenever the subject of homosexuality is brought up here at Talk Wisdom, the discussion often becomes a battle. I know it's difficult, but let's try to keep a civil tone. The Kevin Jennings story is so outrageous that it is hard to believe this evil pervert was chosen by Obama for "safe schools czar."

Hat Tip:

Big Government.

*******
P.S. GateWay Pundit has two stories on the radical homosexual agenda being pushed upon children in public schools. Jim Hoft's site has been continually attacked since revealing this story. The link isn't working right now, but when it is, be sure to read about the books and the content in them in the post there. Absolutely unbelievable that schools are promoting such gay p0rno books - to children!!

Links are working now. Here are the two links:

GateWay Pundit: Obama Safe Schools Czar Promoted Fisting to Children

GateWay Pundit: Obama's Safe Schools Czar Promotes Child Sex Books; Praised Man-Boy Sex Leader

The Sobering Truth

With all of the fun everyone has been having about the ridiculous choice of Barack Hussein Obama as the undeserved recipient for the Nobel Peace Prize, at the end of the day - there is a sobering reality that we all must return to.

Charles Krauthammer nails it in his new article, Decline Is A Choice.


I recommend reading the entire article, but this portion was quite sobering to me:

But whatever bizarre form of multilateral or universal structures is envisioned for keeping world order, certainly hegemony--and specifically American hegemony--is to be retired.

This renunciation of primacy is not entirely new. Liberal internationalism as practiced by the center-left Clinton administrations of the 1990s--the beginning of the unipolar era--was somewhat ambivalent about American hegemony, although it did allow America to be characterized as "the indispensable nation," to use Madeleine Albright's phrase. Clintonian center-left liberal internationalism did seek to restrain American power by tying Gulliver down with a myriad of treaties and agreements and international conventions. That conscious constraining of America within international bureaucratic and normative structures was rooted in the notion that power corrupts and that external restraints would curb arrogance and overreaching and break a willful America to the role of good international citizen.

But the liberal internationalism of today is different. It is not center-left, but left-liberal. And the new left-liberal internationalism goes far beyond its earlier Clintonian incarnation in its distrust of and distaste for American dominance. For what might be called the New Liberalism, the renunciation of power is rooted not in the fear that we are essentially good but subject to the corruptions of power--the old Clintonian view--but rooted in the conviction that America is so intrinsically flawed, so inherently and congenitally sinful that it cannot be trusted with, and does not merit, the possession of overarching world power.

For the New Liberalism, it is not just that power corrupts. It is that America itself is corrupt--in the sense of being deeply flawed, and with the history to prove it. An imperfect union, the theme of Obama's famous Philadelphia race speech, has been carried to and amplified in his every major foreign-policy address, particularly those delivered on foreign soil. (Not surprisingly, since it earns greater applause over there.)

And because we remain so imperfect a nation, we are in no position to dictate our professed values to others around the world. Demonstrators are shot in the streets of Tehran seeking nothing but freedom, but our president holds his tongue because, he says openly, of our own alleged transgressions towards Iran (presumably involvement in the 1953 coup). Our shortcomings are so grave, and our offenses both domestic and international so serious, that we lack the moral ground on which to justify hegemony.

These fundamental tenets of the New Liberalism are not just theory. They have strategic consequences. If we have been illegitimately playing the role of world hegemon, then for us to regain a legitimate place in the international system we must regain our moral authority. And recovering moral space means renouncing ill-gotten or ill-conceived strategic space.

Operationally, this manifests itself in various kinds of strategic retreat, most particularly in reversing policies stained by even the hint of American unilateralism or exceptionalism. Thus, for example, there is no more "Global War on Terror." It's not just that the term has been abolished or that the secretary of homeland security refers to terrorism as "man-caused disasters." It is that the very idea of our nation and civilization being engaged in a global mortal struggle with jihadism has been retired as well.

The operational consequences of that new view are already manifest. In our reversion to pre-9/11 normalcy--the pretense of pre-9/11 normalcy--antiterrorism has reverted from war fighting to law enforcement. High-level al Qaeda prisoners, for example, will henceforth be interrogated not by the CIA but by the FBI, just as our response to the attack on the USS Cole pre-9/11--an act of war--was to send FBI agents to Yemen.

The operational consequences of voluntary contraction are already evident:

* Unilateral abrogation of our missile-defense arrangements with Poland and the Czech Republic--a retreat being felt all through Eastern Europe to Ukraine and Georgia as a signal of U.S. concession of strategic space to Russia in its old sphere of influence.

* Indecision on Afghanistan--a widely expressed ambivalence about the mission and a serious contemplation of minimalist strategies that our commanders on the ground have reported to the president have no chance of success. In short, a serious contemplation of strategic retreat in Afghanistan (only two months ago it was declared by the president to be a "war of necessity") with possibly catastrophic consequences for Pakistan.

* In Iraq, a determination to end the war according to rigid timetables, with almost no interest in garnering the fruits of a very costly and very bloody success--namely, using our Strategic Framework Agreement to turn the new Iraq into a strategic partner and anchor for U.S. influence in the most volatile area of the world. Iraq is a prize--we can debate endlessly whether it was worth the cost--of great strategic significance that the administration seems to have no intention of exploiting in its determination to execute a full and final exit.

* In Honduras, where again because of our allegedly sinful imperial history, we back a Chávista caudillo seeking illegal extension of his presidency who was removed from power by the legitimate organs of state--from the supreme court to the national congress--for grave constitutional violations.

The New Liberalism will protest that despite its rhetoric, it is not engaging in moral reparations, but seeking real strategic advantage for the United States on the assumption that the reason we have not gotten cooperation from, say, the Russians, Iranians, North Koreans, or even our European allies on various urgent agendas is American arrogance, unilateralism, and dismissiveness. And therefore, if we constrict and rebrand and diminish ourselves deliberately--try to make ourselves equal partners with obviously unequal powers abroad--we will gain the moral high ground and rally the world to our causes.

Well, being a strategic argument, the hypothesis is testable. Let's tally up the empirical evidence of what nine months of self-abasement has brought.

With all the bowing and scraping and apologizing and renouncing, we couldn't even sway the International Olympic Committee. Given the humiliation incurred there in pursuit of a trinket, it is no surprise how little our new international posture has yielded in the coin of real strategic goods. Unilateral American concessions and offers of unconditional engagement have moved neither Iran nor Russia nor North Korea to accommodate us. Nor have the Arab states--or even the powerless Palestinian Authority--offered so much as a gesture of accommodation in response to heavy and gratuitous American pressure on Israel. Nor have even our European allies responded: They have anted up essentially nothing in response to our pleas for more assistance in Afghanistan.

The very expectation that these concessions would yield results is puzzling. Thus, for example, the president is proposing radical reductions in nuclear weapons and presided over a Security Council meeting passing a resolution whose goal is universal nuclear disarmament, on the theory that unless the existing nuclear powers reduce their weaponry, they can never have the moral standing to demand that other states not go nuclear.

But whatever the merits of unilateral or even bilateral U.S.-Russian disarmament, the notion that it will lead to reciprocal gestures from the likes of Iran and North Korea is simply childish. They are seeking the bomb for reasons of power, prestige, intimidation, blackmail, and regime preservation. They don't give a whit about the level of nuclear arms among the great powers. Indeed, both Iran and North Korea launched their nuclear weapons ambitions in the 1980s and the 1990s--precisely when the United States and Russia were radically reducing their arsenals.

This deliberate choice of strategic retreats to engender good feeling is based on the naïve hope of exchanges of reciprocal goodwill with rogue states. It comes as no surprise, therefore, that the theory--as policy--has demonstrably produced no strategic advances. But that will not deter the New Liberalism because the ultimate purpose of its foreign policy is to make America less hegemonic, less arrogant, less dominant.

In a word, it is a foreign policy designed to produce American decline--to make America essentially one nation among many. And for that purpose, its domestic policies are perfectly complementary.

Domestic policy, of course, is not designed to curb our power abroad. But what it lacks in intent, it makes up in effect. Decline will be an unintended, but powerful, side effect of the New Liberalism's ambition of moving America from its traditional dynamic individualism to the more equitable but static model of European social democracy.

This is not the place to debate the intrinsic merits of the social democratic versus the Anglo-Saxon model of capitalism. There's much to be said for the decency and relative equity of social democracy. But it comes at a cost: diminished social mobility, higher unemployment, less innovation, less dynamism and creative destruction, less overall economic growth.


Hat tip:

The Weekly Standard

Accessed through a link from:

Nice Deb

Some Lefties Are Just DELUSIONAL! [Update]




It's bad enough that one of the ObamaBORG Bots of the blogosphere likes to mention my blog in posts that really have nothing to do with me. However, he does it to grab my attention - probably hoping that I will respond. Well, I did respond - again - to another one of Mike Rucker's race-baiting "call me a racist" screeds. [I know, I know - why do I even bother?]

I will let each reader here be their own judge of the following exchange in the comment section. If you care to share your opinion, please feel free to do so.

I am too tired this evening to reply to Mike's latest screed of accusations against me, but stay tuned. Tomorrow is another day!

First, read the post at the link above.

Second, read the comments posted thus far:

2 Responses to “ let me be frank ”

I wonder…when will the tables turn far enough against Obama for many in the black community to finally call him bi-racial? After all, Obama is said to be 50% white, 33% of Arab descent, and only 7% black African. Will they one day blame his “white side” for the mess he is creating in our nation?

Oh wait…never mind. I can’t say THAT! I SHOULDN’T say THAT! It will be seen as racist – just like everything else is being labeled “racist” by his supporters (like YOU) and cronies! Uh oh…am I being anti-white by speaking my mind like this?

No Mike. Every objection against Obama IS NOT ABOUT RACE! It is about his bad policies, out-of-control spending, far-left ideology, Marxist philosophy, corruption, and the crazy minded czars that surround Obama that make people dislike what he is doing in America.

Your cries of “racism” can’t disguise the fact that people are very upset and concerned with the type of “change” that Obama is attempting to inflict upon our Constitutional Republic. THEY DON’T LIKE IT! PERIOD!

You ought to apply a similar conclusion to your race-baiting mantra as you apparently did in the following one that you had about Christ:

“and come to some different conclusions i did.”

You are guilty of crying “wolf” by making the objections to Obama ONLY about race. All I can say at this point is SHAME ON YOU!

Christinewjc said this on October 5, 2009 at 1:43 am

*******
Mike responds:

Quote from Christine:

I wonder…when will the tables turn far enough against Obama for many in the black community to finally call him bi-racial? After all, Obama is said to be 50% white, 33% of Arab descent, and only 7% black African. Will they one day blame his “white side” for the mess he is creating in our nation?

Oh wait…never mind. I can’t say THAT! I SHOULDN’T say THAT! It will be seen as racist – just like everything else is being labeled “racist” by his supporters (like YOU) and cronies! Uh oh…am I being anti-white by speaking my mind like this?
/quote

your statement is most certainly racist, and making a joke that it isn’t makes the judgment all the more accurate and your comment all the more identifiable. it’s just like the picture above of book on the cover of his beck – uh, sorry – beck on the cover of his book. he tries to joke off the completely accurate cries of right-wing nazi-ish leanings by dressing up as one, trying to turn the attention away from him to others.

neither works.

but if i’ve accused EVERYone of racism, that is my error. all objections to obama are not racist. the cries that he is spreading himself too thin are very accurate. at some point the political weight the office of the president carries becomes diminished. he gave a brilliant speach to congress about healthcare, overshadowed to some extent by the bigoted racial comments from the bigot racist rep. wilson. in subsequent weeks, obama lost focus on items where his focus should be.

by the way, if i haven’t told you, you look cute in that pointy-topped white hood…

-mr

mikerucker said this on October 5, 2009 at 10:17 am



*******
Update 10/6/09:

Mike wrote: "your statement is most certainly racist"

Racist against whom? White people?

BTW, Glenn Beck is dressed up as a "book czar" on the cover of his number 1 best selling book, "Arguing With Idiots" - which means that he is making fun of all of Obama's unconstitutional czars that surround him at the White House. I hear that some liberal Dems are now highly concerned about all the czars, too. I know - they must all be RAAAACISTS!

You must have nazi-on-the-brain derangement syndrome, Mike. There is no nazi insignia on the outfit that Beck is wearing that would lead any sane person into your ill-informed opinion that he was immitating being dressed as a nazi! Verstehen zie nitsch? (hope I spelled that correctly!)

In other developments today, Obama Fantasyland just keeps the ridiculous coming!

How about the big white coat handout to the doctors that showed up at the White House? Many more posts to look at over at Nice Deb's blog! How about that ACORN 'CEO' lying about the corruption in ACORN?

And, what's up with Axelrod being such a crybaby to Roger Ailes about Fox News' coverage of the corruption surrounding ACORN and many of Obama's czars?

What a bunch of ninnies!!

There is just too much to report and link to! Just look at all the posts in my sidebar!

Call Rep. Wilson all the names you want. He shouldn't have yelled out during Obama's speech (and, he DID apologize and Obama accepted his apology) - but when Wilson said "you lie" to Obama when Obama claimed that illegal aliens would not get health care coverage, Wilson exposed the truth! But now, Obama will most likely give all illegals amnesty so they CAN be covered if ObamaSCARE HELLcare passes.

God help our Republic!