The other night, my depressed feelings came about after reading these two posts:
1. A Place to Ask Questions to Get the Right Answers:The Third Circuit Court of Appeals Affirms the Dismissal of the Kerchner v. Obama/Congress Case for Lack of Standing and Orders Attorney Apuzzo to Show Cause Why He Should Not Be Assessed Damages and Costs.
2. The Post & Email: July 4, Day of Former Independence
But then, I read this today:
3. Dr Kates View: Judges Impeach Themselves
And in the comment section, I found a link to this blog post:
Give Us Liberty: Kerchner v Obama- All Is Not Lost
After reading that article, it was then that I realized that the quick decision in the Third Circuit Court would mean that the case of Kerchner et al vs. Obama et al would FINALLY get to the Supreme Court - which is precisely where Attorney Mario Apuzzo figured it would one day end up - and ultimately be decided.
Excerpt:
What was bad, besides the whole process of mucking around with this Usurper business, is the clownish Catch-22 the appeals court gave as their justification to dismiss. In essence they said we dismissed the Berg case for lack of standing, and this is just another identical case of "no standing". But if you read the ruling against Berg, you'll see the reason for dismissing his case was not related to the Kerchner case as stated Friday.
The Berg case was thrown out for lack of standing because the ruling stated "any person has a right to run for president, irregardless of their eligibility status, the test of eligibility cannot be applied unless and until that person actually wins the election and takes the oath. Therefore Berg was dismissed because he filed in October 2008, a month before the election. The appeals court wanted to ensure every jackalope and freak in the country weren't impinged upon in their efforts to be the prez.
Mario Appuzzo took that timing issue into account, he didn't file his case until January 20, 2009. His time stamp on his electronic filing indicates it was filed as Obama was actually taking the oath of office. Hmmm no standing as in Berg v Obama? It sure doesn't ring true. Not as written by the 3rd circuit appeal when you hold up both cases side by side.
A cute Catch-22 the 3rd circuit dreamed up. You can't be heard before someone is elected, but on the other hand once that person gets elected now you can't be heard because now the prior case's dismissal precludes it. Sounds like a case of judicial PMS, one bitchy irrational thought, justified by another equally bitchy irrational thought.
We've got November and we've still got a future ruling from the Supreme Court due us. We also must press our state governments to pass eligibility legislation enforceable prior to the 2012 election.
I DO pray that it doesn't get ugly or that people have to resort to taking up arms in order to finally protect WE THE PEOPLE. Many Americans are highly concerned about the lack of the rule of law against all of the ongoing lawlessness we are experiencing. The obvious trashing of the Constitution of the United States that has occurred in order to get Obama elected and kept in power is becoming more and more evident as time goes by.
I did like what blogger Steve said at the end of his post:
I've mentioned a couple of our hopes in this endeavor to wrest America from the hands of the Usurper, now I'll close by listing our greatest strength. We've got God.
As I have stated many times before, our timing is flawed, but God's timing is always perfect!
And then there is this!
Globe Magazine: Obama Presidency Illegal!
I know what you must be thinking. The Globe is just a "rag" magazine. However, the formerly entitled "rag" magazine - The Enquirer - broke the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal! And one of these two "rags" also broke the John Edwards infidelity scandal.
The good news is that people are REALLY LOOKING into the issue now, and not just dismissing the "birthers" claims anymore. Heck! Links in my stats have included searches for "Where is Obama's birth certificate" almost every day! The Yahoo search includes over 8 million similar searches! That's a lot of people searching for that particular information from just one search engine!
Although Phil Berg apparently filed his lawsuit too soon - before Obama assumed the pResidency, the facts are piling up against the usurper. Take another look at an old video (that I remember seeing in the past) which has most likely been updated. Pay close attention to the very beginning of the video and note what Obama says at (what appears to be) a town hall meeting:
Hat Tips to all links!
Also see the latest ad:
Washington Times National Weekly: Hawaii Sr. Elections Clerk: Obama Was NOT Born in Hawaii.
And this breaking news:
Before Its News.com: Citizen has Standing to contest the eligibility of candidates for office (ILLINOIS RESIDENT OPENS THE DOOR TO SUCCESSFULLY CHALLENGING OBAMAS CONSTITUTIONAL QUALIFICATIONS TO HOLD OFFICE)