If u only ship 200thound of an album how many are u f#cking tryen to sell??the artist does control that nor does he or she control marketing
If the music wasn't good how do u get to #1 and 2.5mill!!but if folks say they didn't even no wen the album came out?????
Benefit of the doubt:Maybe no1is checking 4 the artist anymore?Well if that was true then how do u explain selling 2mill singles n 2.5month
Benefit of the doubt: Maybe no1 wants to hear music from that artist?well if that was true then the artist would not have a #1 song!
Who should be held responsible wen a artist has a history for selling records so its not like a new artist n no1 knows his r her name?
So who fault is it when a artist gives the label not only a #1 hit but there first top40 #1 n label history!sell 2mill n singles n 2.5month
So intern the artist must bare the brunt of that failure and take responsibility and consequences as handed out by his or her label!!
Nodoubt wen a artist doesn't deliver a song that does crack top of the charts or even top10 the label is quick to say artist didn't deliver
So not only is the label ur partner but also disciplinarian and 90% of the time the one who decides if the partnership continues!
When a artist doesn't deliver sufficient material they(artist)gets its budget cut for next album or worse dropped from the label!
Thing about the partnership is that n the public eye the responsibility is not 50/50!the artist is always the 1who catches 90% of the blame
A record deal is a 50/50 partnership!As a artist its your job to provide the record company with music that they(record company)can sell!
We're not gonna lie, we agree, how do these 'artist' expect to stay relevant without the people that keep them a topic? Nelly, that's So Stadium Status! Make sure yall go pick up '5.0'!