MSNBC Poll - Obama Gets An "F" From 61% [add-ons]

Ha! Look what I found via Nice Deb's blog! What is amazing is the fact that it is an MSNBC poll - you know - the cable network that has been having a slobbering love affair with Resident Obamafraud!

Give President Obama a grade
Live Vote
If you were grading Barack Obama on his performance as president, what would he get?

He gets an A

He gets a B

He gets a C

He gets a D

He gets an F


Vote to see results


Live Vote
If you were grading Barack Obama on his performance as president, what would he get? * 34437 responses

[Note: Following results as of 3/9/09 at 9:10 p.m. PT]

He gets an A
23%

He gets a B
5.7%

He gets a C
4.3%

He gets a D
11%

He gets an F
56%

Go vote while the poll is still open!


Hat Tip: Nice Deb's blog!

*******

Update on 3/10/09 at 7:41 a.m. PT

Now the "F" grade score is at 61%!!!

Take a look at the comments! People across this nation are really disappointed in him and angry! Can't blame them...now can we.

Elect an inexperienced narcissist like Resident Obama? Be prepared for a lot of pain and misery.

*******

Second Update:

A must read article over at WorldNetDaily!

Is Snopes.com infallible?

Excerpt:

Millions of Americans, including national leaders, who rely on the popular online hoax-buster Snopes.com as the ultimate authority in separating truth from fiction, may be surprised to learn that behind the Wizard's curtain, is just a husband and wife doing research on their own.
In fact, Snopes, routinely cited by many as the final word on both frivolous and important stories, is not the well-staffed think tank of researchers, journalists and computer hacks one might expect – but rather, the work of David and Barbara Mikkelson, living in a Los Angeles suburb.

And though Snopes arguably deserves the popularity it has accrued over the years, many have come to regard the site as virtually infallible – which it definitely is not, say critics. Yet today, major news organizations such as the Associated Press and MSNBC cite Snopes as a definitive source for determining accuracy in suspicious stories. Six to 8 million viewers visit the site monthly. National Review Online calls Snopes "indispensable."
In fact, as WND has reported, a U.S. senator recently dismissed an issue as significant as determining the eligibility of Barack Obama to serve as president based on the word of Snopes.

"Rumors pertaining to [Obama's] citizenship status have been circulating on the Internet," wrote Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., to a constituent, "and this information has been debunked by Snopes.com, which investigates the truth behind Internet rumors."

Some, however, question whether Snopes merits its reputation as an unbiased, accurate source for debunking controversial issues as "myth," including WND's Joseph Farah.

"Some of you are shocked to hear Snopes is not the last word on truth – that it is not the bible of rumors and urban legends," Farah wrote in a column criticizing not just the website's pronouncements on whether or not a story is a myth, but also how its writer (usually Barbara Mikkelson) determines what does and doesn't qualify as a reliable source.
Bias in myth-busting?

Some critics argue that embedded in the explanations of Snopes conclusions is a political or social bias, citing the great American essayist E.B. White, who wrote, "I have yet to see a piece of writing, political or non-political, that does not have a slant. All writing slants the way a writer leans, and no man is born perpendicular."

Read the rest.



HT: WorldNetDaily

Poll there has interesting results, too:

CAN YOU SEE THE REAL ME?

Sound off on Snopes.com as a reliable source for information (1360 votes)

Snopes has an obvious political bias leaning to the left 21% (285)



If you want to know something for sure, Snopes.com is not the place to check 12%
(168)



I trust Snopes as much as I trust Wikipedia. Both are fairly reliable unless they deal with moral values or politics 12% (162)



Snopes can be one tool to check, but it's by no means the final authority on what's correct 12% (157)



There is no definitive one-stop shop for truth except the Bible 11% (154)



Snopes? What the heck is Snopes? 10% (134)



Snopes is for dopes 8% (105)



I'm finding more problems with Snopes, so I'm using it less 5% (72)



I trust Snopes about as much as I trust what's in my local paper 3% (39)



All information, online or offline, should be taken with a grain of salt 2% (22)



There is no definitive one-stop shop for truth 1% (19)



Snopes has done some great research, though it does have some mistakes 1% (16)



Though it's not perfect, it's as reliable as human beings can get 1% (9)



Other 1% (8)



No two-person operation will ever be infallible 1% (7)



Completely reliable. It's the last word in separating truth from rumor 0% (3)

[Results as pf 3/10/09 at 8:00 a.m. PT]

*******
Third update:


Edit War going on at Wikipedia regarding Obama ineligibility for POTUS issue.

*******

Fourth update:

More on...or should I say MORON Obama and his disastrous 50 days as Resident in the White House:

The Obama Disaster-- 50 Days That Changed the World.

People....can't say WE DIDN'T WARN YOU!!

Those of you who voted for this loser fraud... take a look at what you have enabled this idiot usurper to do...

Here's the list of NObama disasters:

50 Days That Changed the World...It's hard to imagine we're only 50 days into the Barack Obama Presidency.
** Obama is on track to spend more money than any person in the history of the planet.
** Obama and Pelosi's stimulus bill was the largest spending bill in the history of the planet.
** Obama and democrats have already saddled America's children and grand children with massive debt. Not that this bothers them.
** He's lost at least 3 administration nominees due to tax fraud.
** He's promoted a tax cheat to run the IRS and Treasury.
** He's insulted America's greatest ally, Great Britain.** He's reneged on missile agreements with allies Poland and the Czech Republic.** His administration has already met with the murderous Assad Regime from Syria.
** Obama signed legislation to close Gitmo.
** Obama freed a dirty bomber from Gitmo to Great Britain.
** Obama told US soldiers and marines in Afghanistan, "We're losing."
** Obama's VP told US soldiers and marines that US deaths will rise in Afghanistan.
** Obama has already discussed holding peace talks with the Taliban.
** The Obama stock market had its worst January in 113 years.
** The stock market had its worst February since 1933.
** The Dow has dropped faster under Obama than any other new president in 90 years.
** Obama's budget more than doubles the national debt held by the public, and adds more to the debt than all previous presidents -- from George Washington to George W. Bush -- combined.
** Obama managed to spend more than the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan combined.
** Obama will quadruple the deficit this year.
** Cap & trade was introduced that will cost America 4 million jobs and cost Americans at least $700 per family per year.
** Team Obama announced easing restrictions with communist Cuba.
** Meanwhile, democrats further restricted free trade with ally Colombia.
** Obama passed legislation to fund foreign abortions.
** Obama passed legislation to fund embryonic stem cell research.
** Democrats already banned offshore drilling.
** Democrats scrapped oil and gas leases in Utah for energy development.
** Obama's party permanently banned drilling in ANWR.


Hat tip: Gateway Pundit


P.S. Add on the disastrous appointment of Chas Freeman to chair the National Intelligence Council!!!

Hat tip: Nice Deb