Blog News Roundup

Obviously, Obama and the clueless Dems didn't learn anything from the tsunami sweep-out of the House that WE THE PEOPLE brought upon their ill-fated, terrible, and downright dangerous policies, bills and actions!

Obama Says He Needs To Do A Better Job Persuading The Ignorant Masses
posted by nicedeb at Nice Deb » Obama Says He Needs To Do A Better Job Persuading The Ignorant Masses - 7 minutes ago
I’m almost positive he doesn’t even believe his own b.s., here, I think that, over the course of two years we were so busy and so focused on getting a bunch of stuff done that, we stopped paying attention ...

The liar-in-chief will NEVER admit failure on his part in putting forth terrible liberal leftist "progressive" policies that harmed our nation over the past two years! He will blame it all on anyone but who is really at fault - HIM!

*******


Flummoxed Again By "The Enemy of My Enemy..."
posted by William A. Jacobson at Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion - 30 minutes ago
Once again I have a seemingly unsolvable dilemma. If "the enemy of my enemy is my friend," which one of these guys has to be my friend? Via Breitbart TV

I could not believe that Obama called his political opponents "enemies." Has he ever used that term to describe Islamic terrorists?

*******

Unreal. Obama Admits Failure… On Message Not On Policy
posted by Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit - 1 hour ago
This would be funny if it wasn’t so pathetic. This is crazy. He just can’t admit his Keynesian economic plan was a complete disaster. What part of 9.6% unemployment rate does he not understand? The Politic...

FAIL. Unemployment Rate Stuck at 9.6% in October
posted by Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit - 4 hours ago
Barack Obama is the worst jobs president since the Great Depression and possibly is the worst jobs president in US History. (Source: US Misery Index) They wanted to fundamentally change America. They did. ...

Again, Obama inability to be honest, trustworthy, humble and truthful shows what a facade this guy lives under!

*******

John Boehner: “There Seems to Be Some Denial On the Part of the President”
posted by Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit - 6 hours ago
That’s putting it nicely… GOP Leader John Boehner told Diane Sawyer that Obama appears to be in some denial about the message that was sent by the American people. The Washington Post reported: Rep. John B...

Mr. Boehner is certainly being more polite than I would be regarding Obama's DENIAL of the reality of what the election meant!

World's Biggest Boomerang
posted by William A. Jacobson at Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion - 6 hours ago
Who knew that the gavel carried by Nancy Pelosi on her way to the Obamacare vote actually was a boomerang? And when it came back to hit them last Tuesday, it wiped those smiles right off their faces. --...

This title wins the prize for the best one I've seen today! LOL!!! What's worse, I just read on Fox News that PeLIARsi wants to run for House Minority Leader. Is she insane??? Yes...of course she is.

Hat Tips to all links.

Trickle Up Poverty

Before I get to Michael Savage's new book, I want to share a few stories and links that demonstrate why this book is so very important to read before the elections in both 2010 and 2012. So far, I have only read the review (link below) that appeared in The Washington Times, but it was enough to convince me that I need to read this book! I also recommend that every American read "Trickle Up Poverty!"

One of the best political bloggers on the Internet, Jim Hoft of Gateway Pundit, frequently begins his latest blog post about Obama by stated that he is unequivocally "THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!" I totally concur! Jimmy Carter? You are now officially off the top of the heap when it comes to bad leaders of the United States of America. Will our nation make it through all of the bad legislation, awful policies, and damaging ideology of these Fabian Socialists?? Think I'm exaggerating? Here's one of the latest in a very long list of ObaMARXIST's destructive plans:

Featured link:

It Is Done… Obama Promised to Kill the Coal Industry – Today His Administration Came Through on That Promise
posted by Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit - 16 hours ago
OBAMA INITIATES COAL-KILLING POLICIES DURING GREAT RECESSION! “Under my plan of a cap and trade system electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket. Businesses would have to retrofit their operations. Tha...

The election of 2012 can't get here soon enough!

At least we will be able to stop the spending and horrible legislation after the 2010 election!

The dueling headlines over at Fox News.com would be comical if they weren't so serious!

Mortgage Damage Spreads

The Democratic Move this Week that even Shocked Some Democrats

And then there is this:

Obama Hits Boston, Stumps for Gov. Deval Patrick

Can you believe that? Oh yes...we all certainly can. This do-everything-he-can-to-hurt America pResident only knows how to read off of a teleprompter, campaign... and unleash the most horrible damage against the greatest nation on earth with his terrible policies!

Featured link:

86 GOP House Candidates Are Ahead Of or Tied With Opponents in Dem-Held Districts
posted by Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit - 16 hours ago
A GOP tsunami? According to the latest NPR Battleground Survey 86 Republican candidates are either tied or ahead of their democratic opponent in democrat-held districts. The Hill reported: Republicans main...

The good news is that Obamafraud HellCare is going to be challenged by several states in the courts across America. Thank God! If it had to be done legislatively when the new CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN MAJORITY in Congress gets sworn in in January, Obummer would have the audacity to veto it. This way, perhaps the legislation will be shut down by several states and then there will be a domino effect to get rid of it once and for all! I PRAY that this happens!

The evil trio of Obama, Pelosi and Reid continues to sabotage our economy, jobs, national security, health care, borders, industry and our brave soldiers in harms way!

Featured link:

Newt vs. Nancy: Paychecks vs. Food Stamps
posted by Guest Contributor at Gateway Pundit - 15 hours ago
By: Reboot Congress and cross posted at EvictionDay2010.com Newt versus Nancy– (Look for lizard face at the end of the video) Newt Gingrich has pointed out that the November 2010 midterm election is about ...

Isn't it amazing how the Media of Mass Deception still supports Obummer? There have been a few cracks in the dam by some liberal commentators, but for the most part, the Lamestream Media are still maddeningly defending this pResident! But could you imagine how loudly they would have been sqawking if George W. Bush had done what Obamafraud has been doing?

Featured link:

If George W. Bush Had...
posted by null at American Thinker - 10 hours ago
A thought experiment.

What's worse, we have a Muslim terrorist sympathizer in office who would do a criminal act like this:

Featured link:

Obama Administration May Set Gitmo Killer Free Who Murdered US Soldier in Grenade Attack

posted by Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit - 18 hours ago
Because terrorists are people, too. Omar Khadr faces five war crimes charges that include murder. In July 2002, Omar Khadr threw a grenade that blew up an American soldier in Afghanistan. Khadr was wounded...

Outraged yet?

If not, I could posts links here all day! Unless you are mentally impaired by the insane progressive propaganda (recall Michael Savage's book - "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder") or are admittedly one of the harpies for the Fabian Socialists, you cannot POSSIBLY approve of what ObuMARXIST is doing to our country!!

I have not had the opportunity to listen to Michael Savage's radio show as often as I did in the past. However, I caught of portion of his call-in show yesterday. Listeners were calling in and stating that bookstores (namely, Borders) were hiding his current new bestseller (# 3 on NYT 's bestseller list) Trickle Up Poverty: Stopping Obama's Attack On Our Borders, Economy and Security in the back of the stores! The number three bestseller should be clearly displayed in the front of the store along with the other top five or ten books! Liberal/progressive bias is all around us, stinking up the joint with their dirty diaper mentality and pantie-waist attempts to block the American people from reading and learning the truth!

I do not agree with everything that Savage says or believes, but his books have been spot-on in evaluating the evil and exactly what is going on in the political circus in Washington D.C. - especially with it's new Fabian Socialist Islamo-Fascist dictator of a pResident - Obummer in office, his army of czars and his unholy trio alliance with PeLIARsi and ReDUNCE!

The other day, I heard Michael read Ted Nugent's "Trickle Up Poverty" book review which is posted over at The Washington Times website. Go read it! It is AWESOME!! I'm getting my copy of Trickle Up Poverty over at Costco this weekend!

Hat Tips to all links!

Why Pelosi and Germond Signed a Different Certificate of Nomination for Hawaii

While the media is all hyped up about the potential moment of a pastor performing the burning of a Koran, there is other investigative news out there that is not getting proper attention!

Butterdezillion: Certificate of Nomination Summary


Why Pelosi and Germond Signed a Different Certificate of Nomination for Hawaii***

Based on the outstanding research by blogger jbjd here, here, here, and here, Canada Free Press broke a story showing that Nancy Pelosi and Alice Travers Germond , as representatives of the Democratic National Committee, had signed one Certificate of Nomination for Obama and Biden that was sent to 49 states, and another that was sent only to Hawaii. Only the certificate sent to Hawaii included a statement that Obama and Biden were Constitutionally qualified to serve as President and Vice-President.

That certificate of nomination for Hawaii is the ONLY statement in this nation signed by somebody besides Obama which claims that Obama is Constitutionally eligible to be President. Contrary to arguments that Congress certified Obama’s eligibility when they certified the results of the electoral vote, neither representatives of Congress nor any Secretary of State has signed a legal document saying that Obama is eligible. This one oath by Pelosi and Germond is the only legal claim that Obama’s eligibility was verified.

And there is a huge story about how this particular certificate came to be, which the House Ethics Committee, every state Attorney General, and the public at large need to know.

First off, they need to know that the Hawaii Department of Health has confirmed that neither Pelosi nor Germond, nor any leader of either the Democratic National Committee or the Hawaii Democratic Party, has ever even asked to see Obama’s birth certificate. So Pelosi and Germond did not sign this document because they saw a certified copy from the HDOH office. And in fact, if they had seen anything from the HDOH office they would have known his Hawaii birth certificate has been amended and has no legal value.

It’s been removed from the web, but shortly after CFP published their original article about the Certificates of Nomination, somebody claiming to represent the DNC stated on a discussion board that the DNC relies on the state parties to verify Constitutional eligibility for candidates, so the oath by Pelosi and Germond would just confirm that the state democratic parties had confirmed the Constitutional eligibility of the candidates.

But this is where the argument totally falls apart, because the Hawaii Democratic Party actually ignored their protocols in 2008 in order to specifically NOT certify Obama’s eligibility as they had done for candidates in the past. IOW, if Pelosi based her decision to certify on whether the state party would confirm eligibility, then she had a duty to NOT certify Obama’s eligibility, because the democratic party of the state supposedly holding Obama’s birth certificate REFUSED TO CERTIFY Obama’s eligibility.

Read it all HERE.

These two comments by Butterdezillion are quite informative, too:

Yes, I do remember him. He’s pretty busy these days but I’ve been in contact with him in the past. His postings of the 2000 and 2004 DNC and HDP certifications were what enabled me to start making the connections that led to my own research on this. It’s neat how each person plays a role, and how interconnected it all is. I love it that we need each other, and that it helps us stand firm together. The worst feeling in the world is feeling totally alone. Divided we fall.

Hawaii doesn’t care whether it’s the state or national party that certifies eligibility, as long as somebody does it. It really shouldn’t matter either way because in order to be compliant with the DNC rules the Constitutional eligibility requirements have to be met, but there’s always the legal wrangling over whether somebody having to be eligible means that somebody has to CHECK whether he’s eligible. To sign an oath means you bear witness to the fact that you KNOW something to be true. There is no way ANYBODY could know Obama was Constitutionally eligible – if for no other reason than he has no legally-determined birth facts based on the Hawaii BC. The only way Pelosi and Germond could know Obama is even old enough is if they saw his Kenyan BC (in which case they would also know he was not a natural born US citizen) or if they required Obama to submit his amended BC to a judicial or administrative person or body so the probative value could be determined.

I just read this morning that SC requires Constitutional eligibility to be verified, and that the SC Democratic Party certified that. So I need to get the links for that and update the post to reflect that there is one other claim of Obama’s eligibility being verified. But the SC Dem Party has the same dilemma as Pelosi and everybody else: an amended BC has no legal evidentiary value so if they saw the BC they knew they couldn’t certify anything, and if they didn’t see it then they were swearing they knew the truth of something they couldn’t possibly know the truth of.

That amendment screws up every legal argument these people might try to make, because it means that Obama has no legally valid birth certificate claiming he was born in Hawaii.

The only defense I could offer for Chief Justice Roberts is if he and the other members of SCOTUS have been told that if they ruled wrongly Soros and the Islamists would create a financial panic which would destroy the entire world economy. I know it sounds crazy. I’m still mulling it through in my mind, but there’s a lot that would be explained if such a thing was the case – not the least of which are the blatant breaches of judicial ethics on the part of at least SCOTUS and Judge Carter, if not also Judge Robertson, and the obviously bad judicial reasoning used in the various cases. When somebody as ignorant as me can spot the legal inconsistencies and violations of precedent, you know it’s blatant.

And these judges doing these blatant acts may be their way of signaling that their decisions are being made under duress. Putting in a zinger so people will smell a rat and know something’s not right. A lot of us are infuriated by those zingers, but that may be exactly what the judges need us to be, might be what they’re aiming for – not to deliberately make us mad, but to give us ammunition to show that the decisions and process are corrupted.

The people arguing that those zingers are actually wise or ethical are Obots counting on people to not check out the code of judicial ethics or the precedents or actual laws being ruled on. What serious attorney would be caught dead supporting Robertson’s claim that a case was frivolous because the issue had already been Twittered? Using Twitters to make a decision would be a breach of judicial ethics – ex parte communications. Every law scholar knows that, and not one serious law scholar would be caught dead supporting Robertson’s decision.

Robertson is stupid and crooked enough that he might possibly have made a stupid argument (he is, after all, one of Clinton’s “Magnificent Seven” who have conspired to take the cases to protect Clinton’s political buddies) but to use what is such a blatant violation of ex parte rules is beyond mere stupidity. It could only be a deliberate red flag, obvious because of its absurdity and illegality.

SCOTUS having a private meeting with Obama when cases involving him were pending is another breach of ethics, and I can’t help but wonder if it’s a red flag put out to show the world something is wrong. Sort of like Alito apparently pretending to Orly Taitz that he knew nothing of the eligibility cases even though Thomas later mentioned in an unsolicited, serious comment (later covered by a smile) that SCOTUS had been evading the eligibility issue. They knew these cases were before them, and Alito acting ignorant threw up red flags; Orly immediately questioned whether the SCOTUS clerk had hidden information from the justices. Scalia’s red flag was perceived, which may be exactly what he hoped for, doing the only thing he thought he could to protest what they’ve done while Soros holds a gun to the neck of the country and threatens to shoot if SCOTUS doesn’t obey orders.

So I’m going to withhold judgment on SCOTUS. I have a nagging feeling that they’ve been shown that Soros and the Islamists have a gun to the nation’s economic neck, which will be fatally fired if SCOTUS doesn’t dance the charade Soros tells them to dance.

Hat Tip:

Butterdezillion

*** The Obama File has photocopies of the two different nomination
certificates:

The
Obama File: Eligibility: Pelosi Certification

Compare to a 2004 Certification:

2004 HDP Certificate

*******

See most recent posts at Butterdezillion. It's about lawlessness, people!

Butterdezillion

*******

Beware The "Social Justice" Trap

When there is so much evil being thrown at us and dangerous overt (as well as covert) actions oppressing our nation by this current insane government, it is often difficult to focus on just one of the many subjects that need our attention. I hope that readers here took the time and effort to view Glenn Beck's show yesterday. The email newsletter said:

Glenn has repeatedly said to watch the other hand. What has that other hand been up to lately on health care? Glenn has the amazing exclusive tonight. Don't miss it at 5pm on The Fox News Channel.

If you didn't watch the show, then you will continue to be ignorant about the America-killing scam that is Obama/Reid/Pelosi HELLcare. There is NO WAY that what was revealed by Glenn on his show (and at the Big Government.com blog) is purely coincidental. The FACT that the "plan" being pushed on an unwilling public was written by a lefty lunatic derelict in prison should awaken any, and all who are not in a stupor or under the influence of the ObamaBORG Kool-Aid. The "health care scam" being pushed by Obama, Pelosi and Reid is just another example and extension of the Alinsky's rules for radicals manual.

Here is a recap link that will give you a good idea about what Glenn revealed yesterday.

Better yet, view the clips:

Clip 1

Clip 2

Clip 3

While posting at other blogs, I often see the Obots ranting about racism and hatred. Most do not bother to address the issue(s) at hand. They just continue to attack the messenger(s) of the truth.

Here at this blog, I have received some quite nasty comments. Sometimes I post them - just to prove that they exist. But when someone comes along and has no point but to disparage, why should I subject my readers to his/her drivel?

The criticisms against me are often directed at my faith of Christianity. I get the "a Christian would never say that," or, "what would Jesus think about you being so racist towards Obama," or, when I point out how homosexual activists are ruining the minds of children, I get the "you are full of hate" mantra.

Let me ask readers here a question. What does the following mean?

"We . . . that are strong ought to bear the infirmities of the weak, and not to please ourselves." C.H. Spurgeon

During Glenn's show, he mentioned that many churches are now being infected with "the social justice" mantra. It was number 8 on the list.

Here's a summary about it:

Again, they've enlisted Andy Stern and SEIU to mobilize their arm-twisting effort, as well as convincing rabbis and pastors to preach the health reform gospel from the pulpit. Ask yourself this question: In the last six months, have you heard this message come from your pastor, priest or rabbi? If so, point number 8 has been achieved. I have been on major church Web sites. I couldn't believe what I was seeing: Within three clicks you are at HCAN!

An extreme example of the social justice trap would be Jeremiah Wright's church in Chicago. We all can recall the recorded rantings of Obama's former co-called "pastor." I have to put that title in quotes because I know of not one single pastor (who genuinely follows Jesus Christ, studies God's Word, and preaches the Gospel) who would EVER utter such vile words and spew such terrible and unbiblical rhetoric the way that Wright did for 20 years to his congregation.

There are those who are much less extreme, but also use the "social justice" mentality to skew (or eliminate) the need for mankind to acknowledge his/her sins, confess and repent of them at the foot of the cross of Jesus Christ, and ask Christ into their lives as Savior and Lord.

The sanctification process following conversion to Christ continues throughout one's lifetime here on this earth. It requires discipline, prayer, adhering to Christ's commands (e.g. If you love Me, keep my commandments), reading, studying and applying God's Word, sharing the Gospel "in season and out of season" and listening to the leading of the Holy Spirit of God as He guides you unto all truth.

As I have stated many times at this blog, before one can know the Good News of Christ's Gospel, we must all face the bad news of our sinful condition. Otherwise, how can we be restored to God if we don't repent of our sins? It is impossible!

The following portion of a C.H. Spurgeon devotional explains further:

Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted. Bear ye one another's burdens, and so fulfil the law of Christ.

Brethren, if any of you do err from the truth, and one convert him; let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins.--Seeing ye have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit unto unfeigned love of the brethren, [see that ye] love one another with a pure heart fervently.

Did you notice the terms "unfeigned love" in that second paragraph? It means genuine love. Genuine love tells the truth about what is needed to save our souls from death. How do we do that? By "converteth the sinner from the error of his way" and thus "purify[ing] our souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit."

We are told to "bear ye one another's burdens." That means having a heart for the unsaved, even though they may revile you in the process of your sharing the Gospel with them. We cannot convert - God alone does that - we can only share the Gospel Truth with sinners about their sin [which we all are guilty of without Christ's sacrificial death on the cross...which is the only way we can be forgiven for our sins] and continue to pray that they will let Him into their hearts to save them.

All must answer Jesus' question: "Who do you say that I am?"

I have found that social justice advocates often label biblically-based Christian believers as "hateful," "unchristian," "unloving," and not "like Christ." Don't be fooled (or moved in the wrong direction) by this rhetoric. It is designed to take away the focus of their own sin problem and hurl it onto those who are attempting to witness the true Gospel of Christ to them!

Spurgeon:

Yea, all [of you] be subject one to another, and be clothed with humility: for God resisteth the proud, and giveth grace to the humble.

We ought to be humble. As that 1970's song lyric tells us, our bodies are nothing but "dust in the wind." Yet, many people today unfortunately pay much more attention to their finite and dying physical bodies than to their eternal souls!

Being "clothed with humility" is the way God "resisteth the proud." Jesus' ministry on earth was the perfect example of this. Despite all the good and miracles that Jesus did, there were still "proud" people who rejected him. Recall how he was hated, spat upon, called names, reviled, mocked, whipped, and ultimately crucified by those who did "not know what they were doing?" Jesus is willing to forgive anyone - if they will humbly come to the cross of salvation and repent!

I will now conclude this post with last evening's devotional. I pray that it speaks to your heart as much as it spoke to mine when I first read it.

Daily Light on the Daily Path Devotional
Tuesday December 8, 2009
http://bible.christiansunite.com/devotionals.shtml


Evening

The dust return to the earth as it was.

It is sown in corruption; . . . it is sown in dishonour; . . . it is sown in
weakness; it is raised in power: it is sown a natural body.--The first man [is] of the earth, earthy.

Dust thou [art], and unto dust shalt thou return.--One dieth in his full
strength, being wholly at ease and quiet. . . . And another dieth in the
bitterness of his soul, and never eateth with pleasure. They shall lie down alike in the dust, and the worms shall cover them.

My flesh . . . shall rest in hope.--[Though] after my skin [worms] destroy this [body], yet in my flesh shall I see God.-- The Lord Jesus Christ . . . shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself.

LORD, make me to know mine end, and the measure of my days, what it [is; that] I may know how frail I [am].--So teach [us] to number our days, that we may apply [our] hearts unto wisdom.

Ec 12:7 1Co 15:42-44,47 Ge 3:19 Job 21:23,25,26 Ps 16:9 Job 19:26 Php 3:20,21 Ps 39:4 90:12

Hat Tips:

The Daily Beck

Christians Unite.com

Oh My Gosh!! (Update on Obama Case)

Could the following information be what Glenn Beck was referring to (see previous post for link to video) during his Fox and Friends interview?

RepubX: WOULD THESE TWO DOCUMENTS THROW PELOSI AND TOP DEMOCRATS INTO FELONY PRISON? INSTEAD OF HIDING THEIR FRAUD UPON AMERICA?

Hat Tip:

RepubX

*******
For convenience, here is a copy of the link from previous post:

Gateway Pundit has a post up that includes a video of Glenn Beck's appearance on Fox News' "Fox and Friends" show where Glenn states, Glenn Beck Plugs This Week's Show: "You Will See Something Exposed & People Will Go To Jail" (Video)

Hat Tip:
Gateway Pundit

*******

UPDATE AT 3:34 P.M. PT ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE:

RepubX is reporting: Obama case going to trial if Oct. 5th hearing on motion to dismiss not upheld - trial wouldn't be until late January 2010!!

Cross-posted here:

Quote:

Obama case going to trial if Oct. 5th hearing on motion to dismiss not upheld - trial wouldn't be until late January 2010!!
by DefendUSx September 08, 2009 16:05
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

A California judge today tentatively scheduled a trial for Jan. 26, 2010, for a case that challenges Barack Obama's eligibility to be president based on questions over his qualifications under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.

If the case actually goes to arguments before U.S. District Judge David Carter, it will be the first time the merits of the dispute have been argued in open court, according to one of the attorneys working on the issue.

In a highly anticipated hearing today before Carter, several motions were heard, including a resolution to long-standing questions about whether attorney Orly Taitz properly served notice on the defendants, which she had.

In a second ruling, Carter ordered that attorney Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation can be added to the case to represent defendants Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, who had been removed by an earlier court order. Drake, the vice presidential candidate for the American Independent Party, and Robinson, the party's chairman, were restored as plaintiffs.

But the judge did not immediately rule on Taitz' motion to be granted discovery – that is the right to see the president's still-concealed records. Nor did Carter rule immediately on a motion to dismiss the case, submitted by the U.S. government, following discussion over Taitz' challenge to the work of a magistrate in the case.

Carter ordered a hearing Oct. 5 on the motion to dismiss and ordered arguments submitted on the issue of discovery.

If the case survives that challenge, a pretrial hearing has been scheduled for Jan. 11 and the trial for two weeks later.

More to come...

Hat Tip:

RepubX

*******

ALSO, FROM THE OBAMA FILE:

From The Courtroom -- The Latest

The Give Us Liberty blog is blogging from the courtroom.

At 9:26 AM there was no visible media turnout for this hearing as in no SatCam uplink trucks.

At 10:02 Justice Carter noting the packed courtroom and overflow crowd waiting in the hallways has ordered a change to a larger courtroom and has taken a 2 hour recess to accommodate the transfer of officers of the court and spectators.

The estimated age range of those present is 18 to 80 -- 70% Men -- 30% Women -- age 60+ seems to be the majority.

Attorney Orly Taitz appeared relaxed -- calm cool and collected.Justice Carter recessed the court at 12.30 pst 9/8/09 --

his rulings:10/5/09 Defense Motion to Dismiss (MTD) to be heard -- Judge Carter indicated only a very strong compelling reason would move him to dismiss at this point.

He will review the defense's 9/4/09 MTD. He wants to hear the case on it's merits.

Discovery to be ordered 10/5/09 if Motion to Dismiss is thrown out.

1/11/10 Pre Trial Set -- procedural for other motions, depositions, scheduling, etc

1/26/10 Trial Date Set -- earliest available date for Justice Carter.