Showing posts with label McCain/Palin 08. Show all posts
Showing posts with label McCain/Palin 08. Show all posts

Ignore Polls - JUST VOTE!!

My advice is not to believe the "last" polls being put out there by Zogby, Gallup, or the TV news station polls.

Over at WorldNetDaily, there is a headline that states:

BLAST FROM THE PAST
Zogby in 2004: Kerry 311, Bush 213
Tarnished pollster got winner wrong more often than any other pollster in 2002--National Review

Directly above that Zogby claims:

Zogby: Obama in strong position to be elected
Democrat seen building leads in Ohio, Nevada--Zogby

Others:


Final Gallup: Obama 55%, McCain 44%

Independents break for Barack, boosting broad Democratic base--Gallup

However, the IBD poll has generally been quite reliable in past elections:

IBD poll: Obama ahead by 2

Independents who'd been leaning toward Democrat seen shifting to McCain --Investors Business Daily

My advice? Keep your hopes for a McCain/Palin '08 Administration alive and GO VOTE!!

McCain senior aide 'practically giddy
''We've got a real good shot at catching the guy'--Wall Street Journal

HT: WorldNetDaily

*******
Also see: McCain Camp Releases Statement on Misleading Exit Polling

McCain Fine Gold

There is no doubt that John McCain has a much better sense of humor than Obama. I think that his appearance on SNL last night will do more for his campaign than Obama's millions-of-dollars-from-donors 30 minute infomercial!


See video clip at Breitbart TV

Great Posters & Voter Guides!

They say that a picture is worth a thousand words. I just can't resist posting these today! [NOTE: RIGHT click on image and open in another window to enlarge!]



I JUST LOVE THIS ONE OF GOV. PALIN!



Voter Guide:



I think that the Voter Guide shares PLENTY of GOOD REASONS TO VOTE McCAIN/PALIN '08! However, here are more voter guides with more detailed reasons to vote McCAIN/PALIN '08!







HT: Free Republic

Good News for McCain/Palin '08 !!!

I was just watching the BreitBart interview with Gateway Pundit - who is the blogger who was responsible for exposing the refusal of the LA Times to release a video that shows Obama at a party with radicals like Ayers and Khalidi. When I was finished with that, I noticed a new post at Gateway:

Zogby: McCain Takes Lead Over Obama!!!

It is verified over at Drudge!

Use your brain - Vote McCain!

HT's:

BreitBart TV

Gateway Pundit

*******
Update on November 1, 2008 -

This video is just TOO CUTE! !!

3-yr.old Sarah Palin!


Update on 11/02/08 at 5:48 a.m. PT -

Obviously, my YouTube access has been restored.

My Digg friend, John Kubicek, suggested that perhaps it was "site maintenance" that was going on. However, I haven't heard of anyone else having a problem with embedded YouTube videos at their blogs last night.

I would not know how to check this out - other than if some of my friends come over here and tell me that the same thing happened to them last night.

I still think it was highly suspicious...

Google had suspended some of the Hillary supportors (PUMA blogs) right after Obama was ILLEGALLY GIVEN (IMO) the Democratic primary victory. It took several days for their blogs to be restored. Many of them fled to WordPress and other blog support sites.

I have a WordPress blog, but I don't use it much....yet. If need be, I will transfer over there one day.

[Thanks John - for stopping by and letting me know that the videos have been restored.]

One more thing. When "maintenance" is done at Blogger, we usually get a warning. Plus, I am usually able to sign-on and view my Dashboard -even during the maintenance periods. In the YouTube situation last night, the embed videos first said, "This video is no longer available." Then, the embed link went completely blank and there was only a square white spot on my blog. Each time I would do a search, I couldn't log onto the YouTube site - AT ALL!

I still think that this is all very highly suspicious.




HT: Connect the Dots

Freedom Is Worth It

Dear Mr. Obama -
A video of an Iraq veteran is YouTube's most watched election video, generating 11 million views.

Update: Apparently, my YouTube account has been cancelled and I am banned from the site! This video is no longer available.


Dear Mr. Obama Video

Terrorist Costume = Obama Mask?

OK - this is my last post for the night. One of my new friends over at Digg sent me a shout about this one. It's just too funny!

The liberal nutroot Obamabots started foaming at the mouth over an incident at Amazon. Apparently, when someone put in "terrorist costume" at Amazon, an Obama mask shows up!

You HAVE to read some of the comments about this at Digg. Ha ha ha haaaa! I needed a laugh tonight!

I clicked on the Amazon link, but an Obama mask didn't show up. Instead, there is now a McCain mask for sale under that title! The Obamaborg must have complained (what ELSE IS NEW?) and Amazon did a switcheroo on the mask that pops up under the search.

This is hilarious!

I do recall that history has shown that the most masks sold of one of the presidential contenders is usually the winner of the election that year! We shall see if that phenomenon actually holds up after this election. Could be an interesting bit for trivia buffs...

Good Night!

We Need Redistribution Of This Story!

Dear Friends,

We need redistribution of this story - Hurry Up To Ensure That All Waitstaff Vote For McCain from Neil's Eternity Matters blog!

Here's a copy of the post:

Today on my way to lunch I passed a homeless guy with a sign that read ‘Vote Obama, I need the money.’ I laughed.

Once in the restaurant my server had on a ‘Obama 08′ tie, again I laughed as he had given away his political preference–just imagine the coincidence.

When the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him that I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept. He stood there in disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his tip to someone who I deemed more in need–the homeless guy outside. The server angrily stormed from my sight.

I went outside, gave the homeless guy $10 and told him to thank the server inside as I’ve decided he could use the money more. The homeless guy was grateful.

At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment I realized the homeless guy was grateful for the money he did not earn, but the waiter was pretty angry that I gave away the money he did earn even though the actual recipient deserved money more.

I guess redistribution of wealth is an easier thing to swallow in concept than in practical application.


HT: Eternity Matters


Heh heh....

Could You Imagine...

The media of mass deception firestorm that would have erupted if Republican V.P. Nominee, Gov. Sarah Palin, said this??

Biden to Supporters: "Gird Your Loins", For the Next President "It's Like Cleaning Augean Stables"

The press would have absolutely and unmercifully blasted her!

Excerpt:

"Mark my words," the Democratic vice presidential nominee warned at the second of his two Seattle fundraisers Sunday. "It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We're about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don't remember anything else I said. Watch, we're gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy."

"I can give you at least four or five scenarios from where it might originate," Biden said to Emerald City supporters, mentioning the Middle East and Russia as possibilities. "And he's gonna need help. And the kind of help he's gonna need is, he's gonna need you - not financially to help him - we're gonna need you to use your influence, your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it's not gonna be apparent initially, it's not gonna be apparent that we're right."

Not only will the next administration have to deal with foreign affairs issues, Biden warned, but also with the current economic crisis.

"Gird your loins," Biden told the crowd. "We're gonna win with your help, God willing, we're gonna win, but this is not gonna be an easy ride. This president, the next president, is gonna be left with the most significant task. It's like cleaning the Augean stables, man. This is more than just, this is more than – think about it, literally, think about it – this is more than just a capital crisis, this is more than just markets. This is a systemic problem we have with this economy."


Gird your loins??

And now, for the understatement of the week:

After speaking for just over a quarter of an hour, Biden noticed the media presence in the back of the small ballroom.

"I probably shouldn't have said all this because it dawned on me that the press is here," he joked.


Doh!! Ya think so, Joe???

I've got the answer to your concerns, Joey-boy!

VOTE McCAIN/PALIN '08!!!

*******

In some follow-up news:

Amazing Ayers Audio unearthed from the very same week Obama worked directly with Ayers!

Extremist Ayers and Obama match almost word for word on major issues. Ayers says everyone around him knows his views, he doesn't hide them! This is a must see!


Obama 'Admits' Kenyan Birth? Campaign doesn't respond to claims in lawsuit over birth certificate


Just in case you may have missed this link in the comment section of my previous post, the following link IS A MUST READ FOR EVERY AMERICAN!

The Obama Timeline: 1961-2008

What I really like about that comprehensive article which chronicles important and relevant information about Obama's life, is the fact that the author (and compiler) wants all the information to be accurate. Note this:

The following is an attempt to present the relevant aspects of Barack Obama’s life, from birth to the present. Every attempt has been made to present accurate names, information, and dates. If errors or significant omissions are noted, please free to contact the author at colony14@gmail.com. Please keep in mind, however, that it is incredibly difficult to pin down the Obama campaign on specifics regarding the candidate’s past. His staffers have released very little documentation, and requests for clarification go unanswered, or are answered in different ways by different staffers.


If any Obama supporters are reading this, you must ask yourself - why has the Obama campaign refused to release documentation on this man?

I find that one fact, alone, very suspect and highly troubling.

In the comment section of Obamacrimes.com, m surrette listed all of the documents that have never been released:

written by m surrette, October 20, 2008

In addition to the missing Birth certificate, the following docs supposedly are also sealed or missing:
1. Occidental College records - - Not released
2. Columbia College records - - Not released
3. Columbia Thesis paper - - "not available"
4. Harvard College records - - Not released
5. Selective Service Registration - - Not released
6. Medical records -- Not released
7. Illinois State Senate schedule - - "not available"
8. Law practice client list - - Not released
9. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate - - Not released
10. Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth - - Not released
11. Harvard Law Review articles published - - None
12. University of Chicago scholarly articles - - None
13. Record of baptism - - Not released or "not available"
14. Illinois State Senate records - -"not available"

Since the Constitution requires our President to be a natural born citizen, a valid birth certificate should have been filed and checked a long time ago by the FBI, the Senate, the State of Hawaii, or some other acceptable organization that can take a close look at the certificate number (does it jibe w other births on that day, etc.)

Strange that no official government agency is stepping up to claim they have done this check - political correctness at its zenith. My worst fear is that the birth certificate will be checked very late in the game and dismissed as not being important NO MATTER WHAT IS FOUND. And then where will we be? - m surrette


If you haven't taken the time to view the following videos, please see them while they are still available! YouTube has a habit of shutting down videos that show the truth about Obama and his radicalism!

The Truth About Barack Hussein Obama Pt. 1/4

The Truth About Barack Hussein Obama Pt. 2/4

The Truth About Barack Hussein Obama Pt. 3/4

The Truth About Barack Hussein Obama Pt. 4/4

All the terrorist organizations support Barack Hussein Obama

*******
Update @ 9:19 a.m. PT -

Wow! Take a look at A newscast from a future we must never see.

Janet Porter writes:

"This week, I decided to do something different – my column is in video form. It's a newscast from a future we must make sure we never see. In it, you'll get a glimpse into our nation should Barack Obama be elected president – complete with the kinds of people he'll appoint and policies he'll enact based on Sen. Obama's real promises, positions, record and advisers. It would be comical if it weren't so scary. It is an eye-opening look at what the future could hold if we don't do everything we can to prevent it.

I encourage you to watch it (rather than read it) and forward it to everyone you know in an effort to sound the alarm before it's too late."


View the video first. Then you can also read the text.

Just more evidence that America needs to reject Obama!!

NOBama!!!

Iraq War Strategy Vindicated

During the last three weeks of Election 2008, John McCain ought to bring these facts up on the campaign trail!

October 16, 2008
McCain's War Story
By Adam G. Mersereau


A broad consensus is forming -- encompassing the likes of Bill O'Reilly and Whoopi Goldberg -- that the invasion of Iraq was a mistake regardless of the outcome. Senator McCain has defended the Surge, but not the Iraq War. He is missing a chance to reveal the naïveté of his opponent.


Everyone knows that the Bush Administration made some avoidable mistakes early in the Iraq war. However, after the bold troop surge and the change of strategy designed by General Petraeus, victory is in sight. But no one is celebrating. .


Senator Barack Obama fuels the growing consensus by referring to the Iraq war as a "dumb war." In the first presidential debate, when Obama confronted Senator John McCain on his early support for the Iraq war, McCain changed the subject. In their second debate, Obama attacked the wisdom of the war even harder, and McCain conspicuously avoided the issue. No doubt McCain feels Obama's "dumb war" narrative tightening around his neck like a noose.


But McCain should not hide from the true story of the war in Iraq. Far from being a "dumb war," underneath our mistakes in Iraq lay several strokes of strategic genius. The American people-especially those who have made great personal sacrifices-deserve to hear again the compelling reasons why we invaded Iraq, and how a victory in Iraq could vindicate their sacrifices.


Choosing the Battlefield


It is a basic principle of warfare that a commander must never allow his enemy to select the terrain on which he fights. The attacks of 11 September 2001 were designed for the primary purpose of drawing the United States into Afghanistan, which is Al Qaeda's preferred kill-zone. Al Qaeda helped defeat the Soviet Union there. When the Soviet Union subsequently collapsed, Al Qaeda leaders were convinced they had discovered a formula for destroying infidel super-powers: draw them into the God-forsaken moonscape of Afghanistan to fight a protracted war. Al Qaeda knew it would require a spectacular provocation to lure the U.S. military into Afghanistan. Hence 9/11.


Rather than fall for Al Qaeda's "rope-a-dope" ploy, the Bush administration's war planners examined the global situation. Just as America did not charge headlong into Japan after the attack on Pearl Harbor, we would not launch a massive invasion of Afghanistan after 9/11. Sure, we could have staged a massive invasion of Afghanistan, but to what end? A large-scale war there would cost many lives and untold resources but would render almost no strategic advantage against the global network of terrorists and their state sponsors.


Instead, President Bush would send a small force to Afghanistan to disperse the Taliban and work with NATO to disrupt Al Qaeda and police the border with Pakistan. To engage the enemy head-on, he would select a battlefield better suited to our strategy.


Iraq - the Obvious Choice


The biggest threat to America was -- and still is -- another 9/11 style attack incorporating nuclear, chemical or biological weapons. Even before 9/11, Saddam Hussein's Iraq was a beehive of terrorists and WMD activity. Saddam funded Palestinian terrorism. He gave safe haven to notorious terrorists. He hosted bases for six different terrorist groups. His own "Fedayeen Saddam" was operating training camps in Iraq for terrorists from all over the Middle East.


Just prior to 9/11, a Washington think-tank concluded that the most lethal threat to the United States would come from a biological or chemical attack. Biological and chemical weapons were Saddam's forte. One of the few living humans to have actually deployed chemical weapons on a large scale, Saddam was known to possess large stockpiles of them (inspectors inventoried them after the first Gulf War) but refused to provide evidence of their disposal. He had vigorous anthrax and smallpox programs, and he maintained dual-use facilities that could be converted within mere weeks to biological and chemical weapons factories. And yes, he maintained a skeleton nuclear weapons program, ready to be reconstituted as soon as he could beat U.N. sanctions and inspections with help from Russia and France.


All of this made a good case for regime change before 9/11, which is why regime change was the stated goal of the Clinton Administration and Congress before George W. Bush was elected. Every known method to contain Iraq had been tried and had failed: weapons inspections, economic sanctions, U.N. resolutions, and targeted strikes. Editors of the Washington Post and New York Times warned that containment was not working. Military action against Iraq was publicly espoused to varying degrees by Democrats Joe Biden, Ted Kennedy, Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Al Gore and others.


Although these Democrats were among the first to call for retreat when the war became difficult, their pre-9/11 assessment of the Iraqi threat was correct. After 9/11, leaders of both major parties were all the more devoted to "connecting the dots" between terrorist groups and WMD. For anyone paying attention, Iraq was covered with dots.


In addition, the Bush team knew an invasion of Iraq would bring the terrorists to a battlefield on which an American victory could change the entire course of the global war on terror. If a stable representative government could be established there, the entire dynamics of the region could be altered for the better. We would have a new ally that shares a passable boarder with Iran. Perhaps a new Iraq would even give rise to the one antidote for the spreading disease of militant Islam: a Muslim nation willing to fight against Muslim extremists. Unlike Afghanistan, Iraq had the infrastructure, resources, and political history to make such a vision possible.


When Barack Obama quips that Al Qaeda was not in Iraq prior to our invasion, he shows his naïveté. The influx of Al Qaeda into Iraq did not discredit the Bush plan, it vindicated it. Further vindication came when in 2005 Ayman al-Zawahiri deemed Iraq the "place for the greatest battle of Islam in this era." We had refused to take the bait in Afghanistan. Instead, we selected a battleground that could yield results beyond mere retribution. We had a lot to learn about our chosen battlefield and would make fateful errors, but ultimately our military would learn to fight well in Iraq.


The Surge


The small-force strategy that routed the Taliban did not work in Iraq. It actually prolonged the Iraq war and gave credibility to Bush's critics. When things got bad, Obama and others clamored for the U.S. to withdraw. Biden argued for a partition of Iraq that would have yielded disaster. But when President Bush teamed with Senator McCain to support a troop "surge" coupled with the new Petraeus strategy, they delivered a devastating blow to our enemies in Iraq and elsewhere. At a moment of fierce political opposition and great military risk, Bush and McCain committed our nation to victory. We showed the terrorists that despite the calls for surrender coming from the left, some Americans had not lost their nerve.


To discredit the success of the surge, Barack Obama cites the Anbar Awakening as the real turning point in the war. But again he fails to understand a fundamental truth of warfare. The surge and the Awakening were symbiotic. The surge allowed us to consolidate the gains resulting from the Awakening, and vice versa. This is the kind of "luck" that often follows in warfare when commanders make bold, well-reasoned decisions.


To prove his mettle after calling for retreat, Obama now argues for a troop surge of his own, this time in Afghanistan. Apparently, it was dumb to invade Iraq but it's smart to expand the war in Afghanistan. What is his strategy? What is his definition of victory? What if our allies balk? He should answer these questions before Election Day.


Senator Obama presents himself as a new kind of diplomat, saying he would open presidential talks with enemies like Iran. Ironically, if Iran's leaders agree to speak with a future American president, it will only be because President Bush has placed them under tremendous pressure. Obama fails to understand that before the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, we could not engage Iran from a position of strength. There was no way the U.S. could transport a land army to Iran. The only threat we could muster was air strikes which, when used alone, are often counterproductive. The mullahs knew they were nearly untouchable. As a result of decisions now mocked by Obama, however, the next American President will have real bargaining power. Added to the NATO force on Iran's eastern border, America may soon have on Iran's western border an ally and a long-term military presence.


A dumb war? Rest assured, the leaders of Iran and other Muslim nations see the strategic wisdom of the Iraq war. McCain should tell the story as it ought to the be told.


A former officer in the United States Marine Corps, Adam G. Mersereau studied the basics of warfare at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia in the early 1990's. He left the Marine Corps in 1995 at the rank of Captain. He is now an attorney in Atlanta, Georgia.


HT: American Thinker: McCain's War Story

*******

P.S. Back in 2004, I saved an article entitled, "The Military Brilliance of the Iraq War." Thought some might like to read, compare and contrast what Craig R. Smith wrote back then with what former United States Marine Corps officer Adam G. Mersereau wrote in his article today.

Email to Odinga from Obama

Jim Corsi of Swiftboating fame traveled to Kenya and through an unidentified contact, managed to get copies of emails from Obama to Odinga.Corsi will apear on Hannity & Colmes Monday to further his proof that Obama actively supported his campaign while a sitting senator.

read more digg story

This needs to get out to everyone on the Internet! Please share on your blog, MySpace, Facebook, chat rooms, message boards and via email!!

EVERYONE needs to watch Hannity and Colmes tonight! Listen to Sean Hannity's radio show today, too!!

*******

See also: Obama is Owned by George Soros

*******

Be SURE to see the guy from Wisconsin who stood up at a McCain townhall meeting and BEGGED Senator McCain to expose all of the radicals behind Obama's candidacy!

It's time to fight! American values are at stake!

It's time to REMOVE THE MASK FROM OBAMA!

*******
Here's a MUST READ article:


Barack Obama Revealed, A Dire Warning from an African American...

The writer says it all from a perspective that I never could.