Obama's Citizenship Questions Heating Up


Be sure to look at the videos over at Repubx: Media Coverup Over Barack Obama Birth Certificate Revealed

According to Alan Keyes' Loyal To Liberty blog, there is a standing challenge to debate the Obama eligibility issue.

I am happy to read that despite great pressure to "JUST SHUT UP," Lou Dobbs of CNN is not backing off of the demand to see Obama's Certification of Live Birth.

The Canadian Sentinel: Lou Dobbs Not Backing Off Obama B.C. Demand

Hat Tips to all blog links above.

*******

Update:

Take a look at Leo Donofrio's latest blog post:

Natural Born Citizen: The Relevant Obama Admission

Excerpt:

With all the new media attention swirling around the issue of Obama’s eligibility to be President, I thought it might be helpful to re-release an important blog post I created back when my law suit was pending before SCOTUS. I’ve done this for two reasons.

1. The image that contains Obama’s admission of his birth status having been governed by Great Britain is being scrubbed from the web. It was highlighted originally at Obama’s own Fight The Smears website which has now vanished. The relevant admission appeared just below the Certification of Live Birth which he used to declare he was born in the US.

2. The admission by Obama that his birth status was governed by Great Britian is the one fact which the main stream media has NEVER acknowledged. In all of the coverage on the web and on radio and TV nobody will talk about it. Instead of discussing this admission openly, they mock the entire movement. It’s the new Soviet form of sarcasm. They’ve found a new way to censor people, just act like a bunch of bullies in a sandbox and pretend you are in kindergarden. Kick sand in the face of those who won’t do your bidding and threaten anybody else with sand in their face if they don’t laugh along.


And here's more:

It’s hardly a fringe concept to expect and demand that the Commander in Chief was never a citizen of another nation.

It was Obama who originally said his birth status was governed by Great Britain, not me. He said it. He proved it. Now it’s like the emperor’s new clothes. Nobody in the main stream media has the guts to discuss it openly.

I originally posted the following on December 5, 2008 – the date SCOTUS discussed my case in private conference.


‘When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…’ “

Read that last line again.


“That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…”


That’s an admission that Great Britain “governed the status” of Barack Obama, Jr. He has chosen to highlight this on his own volition.
And this leads to the relevant question:

HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN’S STATUS BE “GOVERNED” BY GREAT BRITAIN?

A natural born citizen’s status should only be governed by the United States. This is the core issue before the Supreme Court of the United States.


*******
Evening Update:

Cross Action News: Birther Issue Explodes