Showing posts with label TEA Party Patriots. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TEA Party Patriots. Show all posts

Sarah Palin Defends Tea Party Against 'Terrorists' Comments

Sean Hannity's discussion with Sarah Palin reflects exactly how I feel about the debt ceiling compromise. Go to the link to see the videos.

Excerpt:

President Obama didn’t address the fact that the VP and another congressman referred to members of the Tea Party as ‘terrorists.’ Sean Hannity asked former Governor Sarah Palin to share her reaction to such name-calling. Palin says, “Well the president’s speech in Arizona, as he asked folks to start ratcheting down the rhetoric, was all talk. He wasn’t sincere in that and that’s typical Barack Obama. Unfortunately, that is typical of our president where it’s blah, blah, blah. All talk and no action. In other words, he didn’t tell Biden to tone it down a bit.”
She went on to reference Obama’s relationship with Bill Ayers, a former member of the activist group the Weather Underground. “I mean he didn’t have a problem palling around with Bill Ayers back in the day when he kicked off his political career in Bill Ayers’ apartment,” she said. She went on to say, “If we were real domestic terrorists, I think, President Obama wouldn’t have a problem with us.”

When it comes to the unfairness of Tea Party attacks, Palin said, “Enough is enough. I’m gonna stand up for those fiscally conservative patriotic Americans that want the best for this country. I’m gonna stand up for radio talk show hosts, who if it were not for them we would have less factual information out there.” She tells Sean, “I don’t want you or anyone else who is innocent to take it anymore.”


Sarah's quote is the best:

Sarah Palin Defends Tea Party Against 'Terrorists' Comments
Sarah Palin fired back at Dems for claiming that Tea Partiers acted like "terrorists" in the debt debate and said the president should have denounced such language. Palin referenced Obama's relationship with Bill Ayers, a radical activist, saying, "If we were real domestic terrorists, I think, President Obama wouldn't have a problem with us."

Ha ha ha haaaa! That is so great!! I love how Sarah uses the left's own negative rhetoric against them!!

Thank you Sarah Palin!! Your courage to speak out and your spot on convictions to "tell it like it is" is always such a delight to those who are paying attention to the circus in the White House! And the jab you gave back to the Marxist, Islamo-fascist progressive pResident was simply priceless!! Thank you so much for your continued sensible solutions to what our nation is going through!

I agree that the TEA Party made a difference in the debt ceiling debate, but we need far more TEA Party Patriots (and FAR LESS RINOS) in the House and Senate (and YOU, DEAR SARAH - IN THE PRESIDENCY!) IN 2012!! I hope and pray that you and your family will come to the decision that many Conservative Republican TEA Party Patriots like myself want to happen - and that is for YOU to run for President of the United States of America!!

Flashback: Joe Biden says TEA Partiers "acted like terrorists" in debt talks. Jim Demint responds on Senate floor.

Hat Tip:

Fox News Insider

Also see:

Big Government: Sarah Palin Hits Another Bullseye: If Tea Partiers Were Terrorists, Obama Would Pal Around With Them

Excerpt:

It is a time-honored tactic of radicals to accuse their enemies of what they do in order to convert a negative into a positive, as the master of political agitation Saul Alinsky taught.

This explains the Left’s newfound interest in the lie that the Tea Party is comprised of “terrorists.”

Unless you think petitioning the government for lower spending is somehow akin to flying airplanes into buildings, you’ve got to agree with Sarah Palin, whose recent salvos on the topic are dead-on.

As President Obama and his merry band of Marxists continue driving America off a cliff, Palin (and columnist Charles Krauthammer) have been pushing back hard against the liberal talking point that Tea Party supporters are terrorists.

Her comments came after Vice President Joe Biden, Congressman Mike Doyle (D-Pa.), and their socialist buddies at MSNBC recently breathed new life into the “terrorist” smear. Because President Obama, who himself has ties to real, live terrorists, has not upbraided the vice president, we can safely assume he agrees with Biden.

Conservatives Need To Examine Trump Carefully! [Updates]

I must admit, there are a LOT of things that bother me about Donald Trump and his bloviating on his possible run for the presidency. Have you noticed? He is on almost every network out there in media-of-mass-deception land!  First of all, doesn't it seem strange that so many in the liberal leftist T.V. land are willing to interview him about the "birther" issue?  I still can't decide whether Trump is genuinely concerned about Obama not being a legitimate president, or if Trump is pushing the "birther" issue in order to:

1.  Fool Republicans into making him their GOP candidate.

2.  A "plant" by the leftist Democrats to continue the shift away from the REAL issue - the impossibility that Obama could ever be a natural born citizen of the United States of America because his father (if, in fact, his biological father was Obama Sr.) was never a citizen of the United States.

If you have been viewing many of Trumps interviews lately, perhaps you will notice the huge differences between Trump's interviews and the following CNN interview of Orly Taitz:

Creating Orwellian Worldview: CNN John King Shows Invalid COLB

If you watch the video all the way to the end, you will see how the other guest shouts down Ms. Taitz when she brings up the fact that Obama used (or is still using) a Connecticut social security number that was previously given to someone else. O'Reilly tried to shut down that fact on his show a while back [be sure to view the video at above link and watch Reverend Manning’s excellent analysis of Bill O’Reilly’s lying performance]
by claiming that Obama's father lived in Connecticut for a while and therefore, that is why Obama Jr. has a SSN from there. However, the sequence of numbers does not match numbers given out in 1961. Apparently, it matches numbers of someone much older. There is also a problem with the number used for Obama Jr's selective service application.

[Update: For more information about the fraudulent SSN:

The Steady Drip: Three Straws That Break aka Obama's Back]

Anyway, back to Trump.


While reading comments over at Patriot Action Network: Donald Trump, “If I Run, I’m Running as a Republican” there are some commentators who believe that "the Donald" would make a great candidate. Others, (like me) are far more cautious. Let's not make the same mistake with Trump in 2012 that the voting public made with Obama in 2008!

Take special note of the following comments and links:

 Reply by Cheri Vaughan 15 hours ago



By Gary P Jackson
Jonathan Hoenig, Managing Member of Capitalistpig Asset Management LLC, has some harsh words for “The Donald” in an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal’sSmart Money blog: [emphasis mine]
Successful businessmen are oftentimes the worst defenders of capitalism. Recent financial interventions began not with President Obama , for example, but with the $30 billion bailout of Bear Stearns under the supposedly fiscally conservative Bush Administration and then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, former head of Goldman Sachs ( GS: 160.42, -1.05, -0.65% ) . The TARP slush fund , onerous Sarbanes-Oxley regulationand prescription drug entitlement were all their handiwork too.
Both Warren Buffett of Berkshire Hathaway ( BRK.B: 81.68, -0.58, -0.70% ) and speculator/philanthropist George Soros are successful businessmen with extremely anti-capitalist ideals. Buffett proudly advocates for a highly progressive income tax where earnings are looted from one segment of the population and transferred to another . Soros has long supported centralized planning and heavy government intervention in the free market.
Yet because of their great individual wealth, their ideas are championed as business-savvy proposals which would lead to a stronger, more prosperous economy.
They would not – and neither would those of Donald Trump.
For example, Trump professes to support free trade, yet proposes a 25% tax on imported goods from China to level what he sees as trade imbalances in the global economy. It’s a contemptuous proposal which would immediately punish Americans by raising the price on virtually everything we buy.
He has also called for regulators to stop European stock operator Deutsche Börse’s ( DBOEY ) planned $9.5 billion buyout of the NYSE Euronext ( NYX: 37.85, +0.26, +0.69% ) , telling Fox Business Network, “I don’t want foreign countries owning the New York Stock Exchange.” If he was the president, he added, he “wouldn’t even have allowed the discussions to take place.” In a capitalist country, shareholders make that kind of decision, not regulators . Trump sees a clear role for governmentpicking winners and losers in the economy, just the same as the previous presidents he claims to critique.
On top of that, he has pushed for a one-time 14.25% tax on the rich as a means of supplementing funding for Social Security and Medicaid, along with universal health care .
Philosophically, those positions are indistinguishable from the anti-capitalist political establishment now in power.
Trump, of course, is free to run and support whatever platform he wishes, as are his many fans across the country. But despite his personal fortune, they should know his proposals and political philosophy are far from capitalist.Punitive and redistributionist taxes, centralized planning, barriers to trade and an entitlement “social safety net” are all ideas straight out of Karl Marx , not John Galt .
You need a person like me to run this country for a while because we have to get this country back so that we’re respected again.” Trump told CNN recently.
A businessman whose proposals seek to destroy capitalism? There’s nothing to respect about that.
Read more here.
The old saying “buyer beware” has never been more appropriate. Donald Trump is not what he seems.
Voters were hoodwinked by Obama and his rhetoric. Trumps record and ideas are more in line with Barack Obama [and Karl Marx] than any Conservative or Tea party member.
Trump is simply playing his supporters for fools, just like Obama did to his in 2008.

Reply by Kathleen B. Collins 12 hours ago


Thanks for passing Gary P. Jackson's clear and informative political analyses of Donald Trump.  I was also beginning to be duped by him, i.e. until I was told to listen to Mark Levin at: http://www.therightscoop.com/levin-rips-donald-trump-to-shreds/.  whose analysis is ultimately the same: Don't let his rhetoric fool you. There is no difference between Obama and Trump!

And there are MANY MORE postings to read regarding why conservatives, and especially TEA Party Patriots, should not be duped by Trump! In order to educate yourself, please read all of the posts by Cherie Vaughan over at Patriot Action Network:

Cheri Vaughan's Discussions

People, the bottom line is this. PLEASE DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK AND VET ANYONE IN WHOM YOU PLAN TO PLACE YOUR VOTE AND YOUR TRUST IN FOR THE 2012 ELECTION!!!

Hat Tips to all links.

*******

Update:

The NEIN Blog: Barry Soetoro's Hidden Past

He's the biggest fraud EVER in the history of the United States of America!!