DEALERSHIPS SPRUCE UP: CAPPUCINIO WHILE YOU WAIT


DETROIT (AP) -- Spending a Saturday afternoon at the typical car dealership is not exactly pampering yourself. Drab floors, battered furniture, weak coffee in a paper cup. And that's before the salesman abandons you for half an hour to "check with my manager."
But Detroit automakers are finally stable after their brush with death, and most dealers can afford to spend a little money to spruce up the showroom. So they're adding leather chairs, rich oak walls, theatrical lighting -- even hair salons.
The improvements can cost from $200,000 to $15 million. But dealers say it's worth it because people expect a more memorable, luxurious experience these days as they make one of the biggest purchases of their lives.
"If we don't meet that expectation, we will not compete," says Richard Bazzy, who plans to spend more than $1 million each to renovate his two Ford dealerships in the Pittsburgh suburbs, including brushed-aluminum exteriors and mahogany and maple furniture.
Whether it helps sales is up for debate in the industry. Nicer surroundings may draw people in, but they also raise costs and let dealers with shabbier buildings sell for less.
Bazzy says he'll pay for the upgrades without help from Ford, but sometimes automakers will kick in. Some dealers have spent millions on their own, while others were forced to by automakers.
General Motors, Ford and Chrysler have been trying for years to get dealers to spiff up, but they're pushing harder now. Honda and Toyota have similar programs. There are specifications for uniform signs, paint colors and furniture as automakers try to make dealers look alike and create a unified image for their brands.
Dealerships that sell luxury cars have been one-upping each other for years, but the contest is moving into everyday brands. Some dealers say it's getting out of hand and the customer will wind up absorbing the additional cost.
After all, who really needs a putting green when they're sizing up a new ride?
"There's a point here where I think it's excessive," says Gary Dilts, a former Chrysler sales chief who now runs a consulting business. "How much cappuccino are you willing to pay for?"
Detroit automakers can afford to turn their attention to modernizing dealerships because the existential crisis of 2009, when GM and Chrysler went bankrupt, is behind them. All three Detroit automakers are profitable again for the first time in nearly seven years.
The dealerships could use the attention. Many have buildings that date to Detroit's boom years in the 1950s and '60s -- and it shows. Competitors came along in the '70s, the time of the Arab oil embargo and long lines for gasoline, when Americans began shifting to more fuel-efficient foreign cars. Toyota and Honda dealers blossomed with shiny buildings, especially in the suburbs.
In the '80s and '90s, Detroit's market share sank further, and it ended up with too many dealerships in more rundown neighborhoods, all fighting over fewer sales. Cheap desks and fake plants had to do.
Detroit tried to get its dealerships, which operate as independent franchises, to spruce up in the 1990s and 2000s. Some did; others wouldn't or couldn't afford to. Then came the financial crisis of 2008.
Many dealers who made it through were targeted by Detroit companies for closure. GM and Chrysler cut dealers during their 2009 bankruptcies while Ford was easing dealers out, all with the idea of selling more cars with less competition.
All told, the Detroit carmakers shed more than a quarter of their dealers between 2008 and the start of this year, when they had about 10,000, according to the trade publication Automotive News. Since the survivors are selling more cars, the companies want them to invest.
The average U.S. dealership has been in the same place for almost 28 years, and nearly half the buildings haven't been renovated in more than five years, the National Automobile Dealers Association found in a survey.
While automakers are pressing mainstream-brand dealers to spruce up, the pressure is even more intense on luxury dealers, especially Cadillac and Lincoln.
Many of those dealerships are worn out compared with Lexus and BMW.
GM is pushing Cadillac dealers to separate showrooms and service entrances from other GM brands, and it expects wooden walls, leather furniture, and fancy tile and carpet. Ford's struggling Lincoln brand has a similar program, prodding dealers to spend at least $1 million each.
At Suburban Cadillac-Chevrolet near Ann Arbor, Mich., the first dealership renovated under a new GM program, both sides of the 41-year-old building were upgraded this year. The luxury side got the best amenities, but Chevy got attention, too.
There's a cappuccino machine in the Cadillac waiting area and coffee on the Chevy side. The Chevy walls are a freshly painted bright yellow, while they're English oak on the luxury side. Cadillac salesmen have separate office space; Chevy salesmen share new cubicles.
Renovation of the once-dingy building cost around $4 million, and Mike Mosser, the general manager, said it's now nicer than the Lexus store down the street.
Even with the upgrade, Mosser would have a hard time out-classing Performance Lexus, a dealer in Cincinnati's upscale suburbs. It has a fitness center, a white grand piano and a lounge with a home theater. It's worth $9 million, according to tax records.
Although automakers often say they aren't requiring the upgrades, they can take steps such as withholding hot-selling models to force improvements, said Dilts, the ex-Chrysler sales chief. The dealers association worries that dealerships could start struggling again if they have to borrow too much money for a makeover.
But for others, upgrades are good business. Ryan LaFontaine, whose family-owned group spent $15 million two years ago to build a sparkling Cadillac-Buick-GMC dealer with a hair salon and restaurant, said he covers the costs by selling more cars than other dealers north of Detroit. He ranked second in the nation last year in Buick and GMC sales.
"We're getting customers into our building that maybe we wouldn't have gotten an opportunity to talk to or wow," he says.
The race for fancy buildings has spawned a backlash from dealers who advertise lower prices because they don't spring for frills.
Bob Shuman, co-owner of a Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep-Ram dealer near Detroit, says he rebuilt his showroom in 2008 on land his family owned. He brews the coffee and mows the lawn himself. There's a soft drink machine, but no restaurant or theater.
"I don't get it," Shuman says. "I don't understand why customers don't ask themselves `Who's paying for all of this?'"

NBA LOCKOUT BEGINS AFTER TALK FAIL


NEW YORK (AP)—The NBA locked out its players Friday when its collective bargaining agreement expired, becoming the second pro sports league shut down by labor strife.

The labor deal ended at midnight after players and owners failed to reach a new contract. The two sides remained far apart on just about every major issue, from salaries to the salary cap, revenues to revenue sharing.

The long-expected lockout puts the 2011-12 season in jeopardy and comes as the NFL is trying to end its own work stoppage that began in March.

It is believed to be only the second time that two leagues have been shut down simultaneously by labor problems.

In 1994, the NHL and MLB were idle from October through the end of the year. The NHL locked out its players from October 1994 until mid-January 1995 and reduced the 1994-95 season from 84 games to 48. MLB endured a 232-day strike from August 12, 1994 until April 2, 1995, which led to the cancellation of the entire 1994 postseason and World Series.

In a call with the labor relations committee on Thursday, Commissioner David Stern recommended that the first lockout since the 1998-99 season be imposed.

“We had a great year in terms of the appreciation of our fans for our game. It just wasn’t a profitable one for the owners, and it wasn’t one that many of the smaller market teams particularly enjoyed or felt included in,” Stern said. “The goal here has been to make the league profitable and to have a league where all 30 teams can compete.”

Despite a three-hour meeting Thursday and a final proposal from the players — which NBA leaders said would have raised average player salaries to $7 million in the sixth year of the deal—the sides could not close the enormous gulf between their positions.

“The problem is that there’s such a gap in terms of the numbers, where they are and where we are, and we just can’t find any way to bridge that gap,” union chief Billy Hunter said.

All league business is officially on hold, starting with the free agency period that would have opened Friday. The NBA’s summer league in Las Vegas already has been canceled, preseason games in Europe were never scheduled, and players might have to decide if they want to risk playing in this summer’s Olympic qualifying tournaments without the NBA’s help in securing insurance in case of injury.

And teams will be prohibited from having any contact with their players, most of whom won’t be paid until a deal is done but insist they’ll hang in anyway.

“We’re going to stand up for what we have to do, no matter how long it’s going to take,” Thunder star Kevin Durant(notes) told The Associated Press. “No matter how long the lockout’s going to take, we’re going to stand up. We’re not going to give in.”

The lockout comes exactly one year after one of the NBA’s most anticipated days in recent years, when Lebron James(notes), Dwyane Wade(notes) and the rest of the celebrated class of 2010 became free agents.

That free agency bonanza—highlight by the James, Wade, Chris Bosh(notes) trio in Miami—got the league started on a season where ticket and merchandise sales, ratings and buzz were all up. That weakened the owners’ case that the system was broken beyond repair, but it also demonstrated why they wanted changes, with Stern saying owners feel pressured to spend as much as possible to prove their commitment to winning to fans.

The last lockout reduced the 1998-99 season to just a 50-game schedule, the only time the NBA missed games for a work stoppage. Hunter said it’s too early to be concerned about that.

“I hope it doesn’t come down to that,” he said. “Obviously, the clock is now running with regard to whether or not there will or will be a loss of games, and so I’m hoping that over the next month or so that there will be sort of a softening on their side and maybe we have to soften our position as well.”

The NBA appeared headed this route from the start of negotiations. Owners said they lost hundreds of millions in every season of this CBA, ratified in 2005. League officials said 22 of the 30 teams would lose money.

So they took a hard-line stance from the start, with their initial proposal in 2010 calling for a hard salary cap system, reducing contract lengths and eliminating contract guarantees, as well as reducing player salary costs by about $750 million annually. Though the proposal was withdrawn after a contentious meeting with players at the 2010 All-Star weekend, the league never moved from its wish list until recently, and Hunter said he believes negotiations never recovered from that rocky beginning.

The union had previously filed an unfair labor charge against the league with the National Labor Relations Board for unfair bargaining practices, complaining the NBA’s goal was to avoid meaningful negotiation until a lockout was in place.

Despite frequent meetings this month, the sides just didn’t make much progress.

Owners want to reduce the players’ guarantee of 57 percent of basketball revenue and weren’t moved by the players’ offer to drop it to 54.3 percent— though players said that would have cut their salaries by $500 million over five years.

They sparred over the league’s characterization of its “flex” salary cap proposal—players considered it a hard cap, which they oppose—and any chance of a last-minute deal was quickly lost Thursday when league officials said the union’s move was in the wrong direction financially.

“I don’t think we’re closer; in fact it worries me that we’re not closer. We have a huge philosophical divide,” Stern said.

Hunter said he hopes the two sides will meet again in the next two weeks, after the union has looked at some additional documents it requested.

The players’ association seems unlikely, at least for now, to follow the NFLPA’s model by decertifying and taking the battle into the court system, instead choosing to continue negotiations. Hunter said last week he felt owners believe the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis, which is debating the legality of the NFL’s lockout, will uphold employers’ rights to impose lockouts.

“We’ll just continue to ask our fans to stick with us and remain patient with us. As players we want to play. That’s who we are; we’re basketball players,” Lakers guard and union president Derek Fisher(notes) said. “Right now we’re faced with dealing with the business aspect of our game. We’re going to do it the same way we play basketball. We’re going to work hard. We’re going to be focused. We’re going to be dedicated to getting the results that we want.”

About 90 percent of NBA players get paid from Nov. 15 through April 30, so they won’t be missing checks for a while. But Stern has warned that the offers only get worse once a lockout starts, so the league could try to push through elements of its original proposal when bargaining resumes.

“The fortunate thing about this situation is it didn’t just come up over the past couple of weeks,” Hornets guard and players’ executive committee member Chris Paul(notes) said at an event in Louisiana. “We’ve known this could be a possibility the past couple of years. I’ve been telling my teammates the past couple of years, and even the young guys that come in the league, to just be ready for it.”

Like with the NFL lockout, NBA players won’t be the only ones affected. Employees of teams and the league also face a very uncertain future. Stern admitted all options would be considered, including furloughs for his employees.

“The people who stand to have their livings impacted by a shutdown of our industry are going to have a negative view of both sides,” Stern said. “I think our fans will tend to have a negative view of why can’t you guys work this thing out.”

AP Sports Writer Rachel Cohen in New York, Brett Martel in New Orleans and Jeff Latzke in Oklahoma City contributed to this report.

FORMER CAR CZAR SLAMS ETHANOL SUBSIDY


Democrats and Republicans are locked in a death-grip over how to cut the deficit but agree the government must get its financial house in order. So you'd think there'd be bipartisan support to end the $6 billion annual subsidy for corn ethanol, which most experts agree is money poorly spent.

Former Car Czar Steven Rattner calls the corn ethanol subsidy "completely wasteful" and almost entirely about naked politics.

"Almost since Iowa — our biggest corn-producing state — grabbed the lead position in the presidential sweepstakes four decades ago, support for the biofuel has been nearly a prerequisite for politicians seeking the presidency," Rattner writes in a recent NYT op-ed entitled The Great Corn Con.

"Those hopefuls have seen no need for a foolish consistency. John McCain and John Kerry were against ethanol subsidies, then as candidates were for them. Having lost the presidency, Mr. McCain is now against them again. Al Gore was for ethanol before he was against it. This time, one hopeful is experimenting with counter-programming: as governor of corn-producing Minnesota, Tim Pawlenty pushed for subsidies before he embraced a 'straight talk' strategy."

In addition to $6 billion in direct government subsidies, Rattner notes the "real" cost to American consumers is much higher. Thanks to mandates requiring certain amounts of ethanol be blended into gasoline, about 40% of U.S. corn production is diverted toward ethanol. That, in turn, drives up the price of feed for cattle and pig, which puts upward pressure on food prices. In the past year, corn prices have doubled while the price of bacon is up 24%, Rattner notes.

Citing these "hidden costs" of mandates, the government's corn ethanol policies are a "much more pernicious force" then even most critics realize, he says.

All this despite studies suggesting corn ethanol is energy inefficient — meaning making a gallon the fuel consumes more energy than it produces.

"Of all the examples I've come across in my time both in Washington and watching Washington, this is one of the most remarkable, inexplicable, inexcusable [subsidies] I've come across," Rattner tells Dan and I in the accompanying video.

Last month, the Senate voted 73-27 to end the subsidy. But the vote was largely considered symbolic since the White House has basically taken a 'mend it, don't end it' approach, meaning Senators had cover to cast the "tough" vote.

Still, the Senate vote is "a signal of the fact the world is changing," Rattner says, holding out hope the political winds are finally shifting away from corn ethanol.
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/completely-wasteful-steven-rattner-slams-govt-support-corn-110457357.html#more-id

SURPRISSING SECRETS ABOUT MAJOR LEAGUE


The 1989 baseball comedy "Major League" is consistently near the top of moviegoers' favorite sports films despite the ridiculous concept of the Cleveland Indians beating the New York Yankees for a pennant. Crazy, right? Sports Illustrated writer Chris Nashawaty recently interviewed the director, David Ward, and most of the cast for his latest feature, an oral history of the movie that digs deep and reveals some things we didn't know.
Here are the top 10 revelations from Nashawaty's exhaustive interview feature in the July 4 "Where Are They Now?" issue of Sports Illustrated. Hopefully, he'll avoid doing a followup for the cast and crew of that dud "Major League III: Back to the Minors."
1. Charlie Sheen was doing steroids during filming!: Or so he claims. Sheen, who played fireballing reliever Ricky "Wild Thing" Vaughn, played some baseball in high school but got kicked off the team because of poor grades. To prepare for his role in the film, Sheen says he improved his fastball from the high 70s to the mid 80s with the help of steroids. That's dedication to the craft. Or something.
2. Jeremy Piven was left on the cutting room floor: Director David Ward admits that Piven, then a prematurely balding 23-year-old actor with just "Lucas" and "One Crazy Summer" under his belt, played a supporting role as a bench player who pelted opposing teams with insults. All of Piven's scenes were (mercifully) cut.
3. Dennis Haysbert can hit a baseball pretty far: All of the actors in the film had enough athletic ability to fill the roles of ballplayers, but Haysbert, who played voodoo-worshipping slugger Pedro Cerrano, actually hit a ball out of the park during filming. Sure, it was only 315 feet but there are enough Yuniesky Betancourts in the majors now who could use that kind of power.
Top 10 revelations from SI’s oral history of ‘Major League’4. Bob Uecker was hired for his work in commercials: Ward claims that when he asked Uecker to play the role of Indians radio announcer Harry Doyle, he did it because of Uecker's hilarious work in Miller Lite ads. Ward had no idea Uecker was already the real life radio voice of the Milwaukee Brewers.
5. Bob Feller didn't like all the swearing: Legendary Indians hurler Bob Feller saw a screening of "Major League" in Cleveland soon after the film's release and told director Ward that he was upset at the foul language used by ballplayers in the locker-room scenes, claiming that they "didn't talk like that." I guess in Feller's day, teammates spoke to one another with flowery prose and bend-over-backwards politeness!
6. The original ending was terrible: Spoiler alert! Ward originally put a twist in the end of the movie where evil owner Rachel Phelps, who spends the entire season trying to sabotage the team in an effort to move them to Florida, turns out to be the team's savior, working behind the scenes to make them better. Test audiences hated that ending, preferring to live in a world where good people are good and evil people own baseball teams in Miami.
7. Wesley Snipes is actually slow as molasses: Snipes played Willie Mays Hayes, a character who was supposed to have both the baseball skills and the self-aggrandizing attitude of Rickey Henderson. Turns out he had the latter but not the former. Scenes where Snipes runs the basepaths were shot in slow motion because he was "not very fast."
8. Corbin Bernsen is as arrogant as the characters he plays: All the actors playing ballplayers auditioned for their part by participating in actual baseball tryouts except Bernsen, who was shooting another film at the time and assured the producers, "Trust me, I can play." Playing washed-up third baseman Roger Dorn, however, didn't require much skill anyway except to be cuckolded by Ricky Vaughn.
[Let your friends know which games you're watching with IntoNow]
9. "Major League" was Joe Morgan's "Citizen Kane": According to Charlie Sheen, the film became a quick favorite among the MLB community and that Hall of Famer Joe Morgan claimed that "Major League" was the only movie he brought with him on airplanes. Bringing your own VCR tapes on airplanes? Fancy!
10. Nearly all the cast members want to do another sequel: David Ward has written a third sequel (or second sequel, for those of us who pretend "Major League III" never happened) in which 20 years have passed and Ricky Vaughn is mounting a big league comeback. In these interviews, Bob Uecker, Dennis Haysbert, Tom Berenger (catcher Jake Taylor), Corbin Bernsen and, of course, Charlie Sheen are all open to come back and let Hollywood unleash foist another sequel upon the popcorn-addled masses.

CHINA OPENS LONGERS BRIDGE (WORLD'S LONGEST BRIDGE)


This photo taken Wednesday, June 29, 2011 released by China's Xinhua news agency shows the Jiaozhou Bay Bridge in Qingdao, east China's Shandong Province. China opened Thursday, June 30, 2011, the world's longest cross-sea bridge, which is 42 kilometers (26 miles) long and links China's eastern port city of Qingdao to an offshore island, Huangdao. (AP Photo/Xinhua, Yan Runbo)
SOURCE

http://news.yahoo.com/photos/china-s-jiaozhou-bay-bridge-1309439624-slideshow/

A sign that reads: "Shandong Highway Corp. invests to operate Shandong Highway Jiaozhou Bay Bridge" is seen at Qingdao Jiaozhou Bay Bridge in Qingdao, Shandong province June 27, 2011. The world's longest sea bridge spanning Jiaozhou Bay of Qingdao City, Shandong Province, opened on Thursday, June 30, 2011. The bridge is 42 km (26 miles) long, Xinhua News Agency reported. Picture taken June 27, 2011. REUTERS/China Daily

CHAVEZ SAYS SURGERY REMOVED TUMOR IN CUBA


CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) — Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez told his country Thursday night he underwent surgery in Cuba to remove a cancerous tumor but assured them he is doing well, seeking to cool growing questions about his health and ability to govern.
Chavez said in a televised talk that the operation took out a growth in which there were "cancerous cells." He said the surgery was done after an initial June 10 operation for the removal of a pelvic abscess.
He called his situation "this new battle that life has placed before us."
Clearly thinner and paler after his surgeries, Chavez read from a prepared speech with a sad and serious expression. He stood at a podium, flanked by the Venezuelan flag and a portrait of 19th century independence hero Simon Bolivar, the namesake of his Bolivarian Revolution political movement.
It was unclear what type of cancer is involved or what Chavez's treatment will be. He said it was a mistake not have taken better care of his health through medical checkups.
"What a fundamental error," he said.
Chavez did not say how much longer he expected to remain in Cuba recovering, and there was no information on when or where his message was recorded.
His appearance came after government efforts, including Tuesday's release of photos and video showing Chavez with Fidel Castro, had failed to quell growing speculation among Venezuelans about his health.
Adding to the anxiety, the government announced Wednesday that it was canceling a two-day summit of Latin American leaders that Chavez would have hosted next week on the 200th anniversary of Venezuela's declaration of independent from Spain.
Chavez said his first surgery was for a "strange formation in the pelvic region that required an emergency operation due to the imminent risk of a generalized infection."
After that surgery, Chavez said, doctors began to suspect other problems. A series of tests "confirmed the presence of an abscessed tumor with the presence of cancerous cells, which made necessary a second operation that allowed for the complete extraction of the tumor," he said.
Chavez said his condition has been "evolving satisfactorily while I receive a complementary treatment to combat the different types of cells found, and thereby continue on the path to my complete recovery."
After Chavez's speech, Vice President Elias Jaua appeared on television at the presidential palace, calling for support and unity among Venezuelans.
"It's up to us, people and government, to keep advancing," Jaua said, according to the state-run Venezuelan News Agency. "We feel extremely optimistic about this battle that President Chavez has begun for a full recovery of his health."
Before Chavez's appearance, some in the opposition had demanded more information about his condition. Some government opponents had also urged Chavez to temporarily cede his duties to the vice president while recovering in Cuba.
Chavez's allies, however, insisted that he remains firmly in control of government affairs, even as he has been recovering.
Finishing his speech, Chavez recited a revolutionary slogan often used by his mentor, Fidel Castro: "Forever onward toward victory! We will be victorious!"
Before finishing, he added: "Until my return!"
After his appearance, some of his closest allies went on state television. National Assembly president Fernando Soto Rojas, standing alongside other supporters, said Chavez is in good hands in Cuba.
"We wish for him to get better soon! Onward, commander!"
SOURCE
http://news.yahoo.com/chavez-says-surgery-removed-tumor-cuba-014728028.html

EX=IMF LEADER TO GET BAIL EASED IN NYC


NEW YORK (AP) — Former International Monetary Fund Leader Dominique Strauss-Kahn will have his pricey bail substantially reduced in his sexual assault case because of issues with his accuser's credibility, a person familiar with the case said Thursday.
The person, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss matters not yet made public in court, said prosecutors have raised issues about the credibility of the hotel housekeeper who has accused Strauss-Kahn of raping her, but would not elaborate on what those issues were.
The New York Times first reported that the investigators uncovered major holes in the maid's credibility, citing two law enforcement officials. One of the officials told the Times that the woman has repeatedly lied since making the initial allegation May 14.
The woman's lawyer did not immediately return a telephone call seeking comment.
Another person familiar with the case, speaking on conditions of anonymity for the same reason, said earlier Thursday that Strauss-Kahn may get his pricey bail and house arrest arrangement eased in the case. The person declined to detail what the new bail arrangements might be.
Strauss-Kahn lawyer William W. Taylor would say only that the hearing was to review the bail plan. The Manhattan District Attorney's office declined to comment.
Strauss-Kahn has been under armed guard in a Manhattan townhouse after posting a total of $6 million in cash bail and bond. He denies the allegations.
Strauss-Kahn was held without bail for nearly a week after his May arrest. His lawyers ultimately persuaded a judge to release him by agreeing to extensive — and expensive — conditions, including an ankle monitor, surveillance cameras and armed guards. He can leave for only for court, weekly religious services and visits to doctors and his lawyers, and prosecutors must be notified at least six hours before he goes anywhere.
The security measures were estimated to cost him about $200,000 a month, on top of the $50,000-a-month rent on a town house in trendy TriBeCa. He settled there after a hasty and fraught househunt: A plan to rent an apartment in a tony building on Manhattan's Upper East Side fell through after residents complained about the hubbub as reporters and police milled around the building.
Under New York law, judges base bail decisions on factors including defendants' characters, financial resources and criminal records, as well as the strength of the case against them — all intended to help gauge how likely they are to flee if released.
Defendants and prosecutors can raise the issue of bail at any point in a case. It's common, if asking a judge to revisit a bail decision, to argue that new information or new proposed conditions change how one or more of the factors should be viewed.
The 32-year-old maid told police that Strauss-Kahn chased her down a hallway in his $3,000-a-night suite in the Sofitel hotel, tried to pull down her pantyhose and forced her to perform oral sex before she broke free.
Strauss-Kahn's lawyers have said the encounter wasn't forcible, and that they have unreleased information that could "gravely undermine the credibility" of the housekeeper. Her lawyer has said she is prepared to testify despite a "smear campaign" against her.
The Associated Press generally does not identify accusers in sex crime cases unless they agree to it.
Strauss-Kahn, 62, was in New York on a personal trip. He left the hotel shortly after the alleged assault — to have lunch with a relative, his attorneys have said.
During his initial bail hearings, prosecutors noted that Strauss-Kahn was arrested on a Paris-bound plane at John F. Kennedy International Airport, and that they could not compel his return from France if he fled. His lawyers have underscored that it was a long-planned flight, and they've said he wants to return to court to clear his name.
He resigned his IMF post after his arrest.

100 $ MILLION ATM RECEIPT


Scrooge McDuck lives. An ATM receipt showing a balance of nearly $100 million dollars was discovered at an East Hampton Village bank.

A customer found the receipt hanging out of the ATM's slot. The customer who found the receipt showed it to financial blog Dealbreaker.com. The receipt, dated June 18, doesn't list the account holder's name but does indicate that the person has $99,864,731.94 in a personal savings account (that's after a $400 withdrawal and a $2.75 service charge). The East Hamptons is a well known playground for the very wealthy.

Is the receipt a mistake of some kind? Perhaps. Anyone with that amount of cash would know that keeping $100 million in a savings account isn't the wisest investment move. Savings accounts earn paltry interest rates and are only guaranteed by the federal government for amounts up to $250,000.


A buzzy article from The New York Post speculates that the holder of the account may be billionaire mogul David Tepper (Forbes lists him as the 208th richest person in the world). When contacted by The New York Post, Tepper denied ownership of the receipt and pointed out that he "would never do something as irresponsible as leaving $100 million in a savings account."

Maybe it really was Scrooge McDuck?
SOURCE
http://finance.yahoo.com/banking-budgeting/article/113059/100-million-atm-receipt

A man under a rock

Pumice Man


We will return to blogging as soon as we can. End of July perhaps, or maybe end of August. September? We'll see.

DEBT CEILING CALLED UNCONSTITUTIONAL


As both major parties debate their conditions for raising the nation's debt ceiling, some Senate Democrats and constitutional scholars are questioning whether the limit is constitutional in the first place.
Delaware Sen. Chris Coons told The Huffington Post this week that he's part of a group of lawmakers now examining whether, in the case that debt negotiations fail, the Treasury could ignore Congress and continue paying its bills on time.
"This is an issue that's been raised in some private debate between senators as to whether in fact we can default, or whether that provision of the Constitution can be held up as preventing default," Coons told Huffington Post reporters Ryan Grim and Samuel Haass. "[I]t's going to get a pretty strong second look as a way of saying, 'Is there some way to save us from ourselves?' "
Critics of the debt limit cite the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which states: "the validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned." (Emphasis ours)
Of course, the Fourteenth Amendment is open to wide, and varying, interpretation and debate. The most basic question here is, does a limit on debt "question" the "validity" of the debt?
Legal scholar Garrett Epps, writing in The Atlantic in April, said that a case could easily made for simply ignoring the congressionally mandated debt limit.
"This provision makes clear that both the monies our nation owes to bondholders, and the sums promised in legislation to those receiving pensions set by law from the federal government, must be paid regardless of the political whims of the current congressional majority," Epps wrote.
In essence, Epps argues that Obama should stand before Congress and say, Tough luck--the Constitution says we can't default. Epps argued that in the event that Congress does not act, Obama should (and could) instruct the Treasury Department to issue "binding debt instruments on the world market sufficient to cover all the current obligations of the United States government, even in default of Congressional action to meet those obligations."
President Obama's own views on the subject, however, are unclear. During his press conference Wednesday, Obama dodged a question about the debt limit's constitutionality, telling NBC's Chuck Todd: "I'm not a Supreme Court justice, so I'm not going to put my constitutional law professor hat on."
Obama understandably didn't want to show his cards by hashing out a plan for how he would act in the event Congress fails to raise the debt ceiling. But some observers have already outlined how he could--and still get away with it.
Writing in the Financial Times in April, Former Reagan adviser and Treasury official Bruce Bartlett said the Obama administration could justify ignoring Congress to ensure the nation pays its debts.
"The president would be justified in taking extreme actions to protect against a debt default. In the event that congressional irresponsibility makes default impossible to avoid, he should order the secretary of the Treasury to simply disregard the debt limit and sell whatever securities are necessary to raise cash to pay the nation's debts. They are protected by the full faith and credit of the United States and preventing default is no less justified than using American military power to protect against an armed invasion without a congressional declaration of war," Bartlett wrote. "Under those circumstances, when default is the only possible alternative, I believe that the president and the Treasury secretary would be justified in taking extraordinary action to prevent it, even if it means violating the debt limit."
However, if Obama were to follow that route, it's still unclear how the courts would rule.

Grim and Saass point to the 1935 Perry v. U.S Supreme Court ruling, which determined that the language in the Fourteenth Amendment does apply to the national debt. What's more, they observe, according to the majority opinion on the case, no act of Congress can undermine promises of debt payment from the federal government.
"To say that the Congress may withdraw or ignore that pledge is to assume that the Constitution contemplates a vain promise; a pledge having no other sanction than the pleasure and convenience of the pledgor," wrote Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, who presided over the case.
Even with that precedent, however, the specific debt limit as we know it today has not yet seen its day in court. Should the White House's negotiations with Congress on the debt ceiling fail, it will be up to Obama to decide whether he wants to start that fight, which would no doubt require years-long court battles to settle.

NEW SMARPHONE IS BIG ON INTERTAINMENT


No, really. The Samsung Infuse 4G’s huge 4.5-inch Super AMOLED Plus screen not only looks great, but practically begs for video playback.
Of course, that raises the question: Is that enough to differentiate the Infuse from Android’s numerous oversized offerings? For the most part, yes.
Samsung has packed this lithe handset with pretty much everything necessary for delivering entertainment on the go. Front and center is its spacious, yet ever-so pixel-challenged 800 x 480 display, a 1.3-megapixel forward-facing camera (with an 8-MP heavy hitter on the rear), and a row of capacitive Android navigation keys.
Inside its slinky 0.35-inch frame is a 4G data radio, and a beefy 1,750-milliampere-hour battery and a 1.2-GHz processor. The processor is powerful, but only single-core. I was surprised by this — Android phone manufacturers are rapidly switching to dual-core processors, as the beefier chips are a marquee differentiating feature in a crowded market. And while this phone doesn’t have a dual-core chip, it had more than enough guts for my typical smartphone needs. E-mailing, task management, light calling and even heavy app and web use was reasonably smooth within the phones somewhat outdated Android 2.2 Froyo OS. In fact, once I got over the pocket-stretching size of the device, the multimedia-minded battery made the Infuse a solid performer for marathon productivity sessions.
However, the real fun of the Infuse lies in goofing off.
Bloatware is rarely worth celebrating, but the video-centric apps that ship on the handset aren’t a complete waste. AT&T’s U-Verse app brought both live TV and on-demand downloads of favorite series like Parks and Recreation, while Samsung’s movie rental store and the generic video player supplied access to feature-length content.
It’s worth noting that none of these options are exactly free (save for the video player, which let me play my ripped movies). Despite that predictable hitch, the Infuse mostly handled playback like a champ. Streaming live TV over the 4G connection produced the occasional hiccup, but pretty much anything I downloaded locally played back flawlessly on the device.
An integrated kickstand or dock would’ve helped for longer viewing sessions, but that’s a minor gripe for a phone that actually has the muscle and endurance to rain down serious flickage at a moment’s notice. And that screen! It’s gorgeous.
Is this enough to dethrone hulking competitors like the Droid X2? Probably. Though we’ve all seen a lot of the Infuse’s individual elements before, it’s rare that they’re packed into such a single cohesive package. Even the mildly girth-conscious will likely balk at the size, but it’s hard to take issue with a handset infused with this much win.
WIRED
Form+Function+Fun. Oversized touchscreen is great for flicks. Fantastic battery life regardless of use patterns. Preternaturally light at 4.5 ounces. Ships with a $25 voucher for movie rentals. Great photos (8MP) decent video (720p).
TIRED
Speaker is fine for calls, anemic for movies. Plastic chassis and volume rocker are pure chintz. Getting video onto a TV is dongle-reliant. All this downloadable video sweetness ships with a tiny 2GB card.

TOOL LETS TENNIS FANS BLOCK OUT GRUNTING


Radio listeners in the United Kingdom won't be subjected to loud shrieking coming from their wireless sets during Wimbledon. The BBC recently unveiled a new program that allows listeners of live Wimbledon broadcasts to minimize the sound of on-court grunting.


This week, BBC's Radio 5 released NetMix, an online tool that gives viewers the option of decreasing the volume of the sound on the court relative to commentary provided by analysts. The site boasts that NetMix can change the level of "the crowd, base-line, grunting and ball," as if people care about any but the third.

[Latest iPad app: Does the grunting bother you? Let your friends know what you think with IntoNow.]

The program came out days after the head of Wimbledon said he would like to see less grunting in the women's game. Listeners on Thursday, for instance, could adjust the volume of on-court sound in matches featuring two of the loudest grunters on the WTA, Victoria Azarenka and Maria Sharapova.

Robert Brun, the head of audio and music technology for BBC radio told London's Telegraph newspaper:

"Having known for a long time that broadcasters have a problem with balancing the ambient sounds of a sports match with the commentary, we felt we had to develop a tool which put the control back into the hands of the audience.

"The BBC receives lots of complaints from the public regarding sound balance — with many of them wanting the sound of the commentators turned up and the noise for a match turned down. Wimbledon was a clear choice to launch this product for as there are always so many comments about the amount of grunting from the players."

This could be a "be careful what you wish for" situation. Turning down Azarenka's interminable, 95-decibel grunts is a no-brainer. Having to listen to certain broadcasters may not be any better, though.

Goodbye Nebraska.....Thanks for the Memories


Goodbyes are always so hard to come by. 

Tonight when the clock strikes midnight, the Big XII conference and Nebraska will go their separate ways.  The Big XII will become a conference of 10 teams and Nebraska will find a new home in the Big 10 as the 12th team (but hey, don't change the names.  That won't confuse women everywhere).

We will miss Nebraska.  The fact is they are a great university (whether they are a member of the AAU or not) from a place with lots of fantastic people and most importantly fans.  They have their great traditions such as the blackshirts and going to Lincoln is always an intimidating place to play at.  It's a shame I never got the chance to go. 

But as we say goodbye to Nebraska, its important to always remember the special times we had together. 






I've thought about this question a lot today and I think it's a pretty fair question to ask.  Did two of the best games every played at Kyle Field involve the Nebraska Cornhuskers? 

October 10th, 1998.

#18 Texas A&M defeats #2 Nebraska 28-21


 
To understand this game you have to know a few things coming in.  Nebraska in 1998 was a college football powerhouse.  I'm not sure if a program today in 2011 is close to their standards.  Nebraska had won the national championship in 1994 24-17 over #3Miami, in 1995 with a 62-24 crushing defeat over #2 Florida (wow), and the year before in 1997 with a 42-17 stomping of #3 Tennessee in the 1998 Orange Bowl.  That's three out of the last four folks.  Dynasty.  Oh and in that 1997 season?  Texas A&M and Nebraska matched up in the Alamodome for the Big XII Championship where Nebraska just tore us apart 54-15.  Yes 54-15!  During that time right at the beginning of the formation of the Big XII, the old Big 8 (now Big XII North minus Oklahoma and brother State) had all of the powerhouses in Nebraska and Kansas State (we'll get to them later) and the new Big XII South?  Mack Brown and Bob Stoops hadn't walked through that door yet.  It was Texas A&M and a bunch of scrubs.  (Sound like the Big XII North we came to know doesn't it? )

On that day in October, Nebraska was ranked the #2 team in the entire country, coming down south to play at Kyle Field.  They were bringing with them a 19 game winning streak, the longest in the entire country. 

Of course they didn't leave with it. 



With battle cries of "Remember the Alamodome!" (so cute) the Cornhuskers went back to Nebraska defeated.  The Cornhuskers would later go on to lose to #20 Texas in Lincoln and new #2 Kansas State, finishing 9-4 in Frank Solich's first season.  (Lost their bowl game to Arizona).  But what happened to Nebraska isn't important. 

That victory on that October day propelled Coach RC Slocum's squad, led by current LB coach Dat Nguyen, Dante Hall, and TOOOOOOOOOOMBS  to a 7-1 record in the Big XII (only defeat came to Texas in Austin--gag) and a right to once again play for the Big XII Championship, this time in St. Louis.  And of course, how could we forget:



November 20th, 2010

#18 Texas A&M defeats #8 Nebraska 9-6



There isn't a lot I need to say about this game.  It's very fresh in our minds.  I even called it my most favorite memory in the 2010-2011 Aggie Athletic year in our first post.  The fact is that in front of a national audience on ABC in prime time, the largest crowd in Kyle Field history (90,000+) came together to watch the re-emergence of the Wrecking Crew right before our very eyes.  Now in the overall grand scheme of things will a game that got Texas A&M to 8 wins, 9 overall on the season, be always remembered?  Maybe not.  But let's not lose sight of the fact that the TV audience that got to witness first hand the return of the Wrecking Crew, and the best atmosphere in college football.  Of course, the next few years will determine how much of a turning point we actually saw that night.  Will we win Big XII Championships starting in 2011?  Or just more average 7-5, 8-4 type seasons?  Time will tell how pivotal this game will be in Aggie Football history.  
So as you sit and ponder about how these games stack up against in the rest in Kyle Field history, here is some feedback I have received today on the topic.  


MASAXET from TexAgs.com


Great question!!!!

I'll go with, potentially 2 of the top 5. It depends on if we can look back at the game last year as a turning point for the program. The atmosphere was electric, and it has potential to be a real catalyst for us moving forward
RM1993 from TexAgs.com

I don't know that either of those would be the "greatest". Probably both in the top 10 though.
I think a more apt descriptor of each of those games might be "two of the most pivotal" games in Kyle field history.
The 1998 victory was the springboard to a B12 championship and Sugar Bowl berth....last year's game wasn't so much of a springboard as it was validation that the earlier victory over OU wasn't a fluke.
 Cinco Ranch Aggie from TexAgs.com

tu '85 announced to the CFB world that we had arrived

tu '99
blOU '02
NU '98
BU '86 - don't laugh, Baylor used to be pretty good and Dave Campbell called this the game of the decade in the State of Texas
 And last but not least Louie Belina from 1150AM The Zone in College Station (2-4pm Weekdays) answered this question on air today (thanks for answering Louie!) and his response was simple. The 2010 game should definitely go down as one of the most memorable games in Kyle Field history when considering the atmosphere, etc.  But time will tell how the game will impact the program.  And for him, 1998 will always be one of this top memories. 

I think that is our best answer.  Defeating a defending national champion and the resurrection of the Wrecking Crew on ABC will always be memories I cherish.  And many will for some time.  Best or greatest games in Kyle Field history?  Let's not go too far now.  I'm sure John David Crow and Jackie Sherrill would have a thing or two to say about that.  I bet the 1939 National Championship team would also like to throw their two cents in as well. 

Whatever those games mean to you, the fact remains Nebraska won't be visiting Kyle Field again.  At least any time soon.  And with that, we say goodbye to one of our Big XII foes.  (Just don't go breaking any cameras Carl Pelini)

Oh.  Colorado.  Didn't see you there.


(P.S., thanks to Aggie Athletics for having great videos on YouTube!)

FUTURE MOTHER IN LAW'S RANT GOES VIRAL


New term: mom-zilla. We know all about temporary bridal insanity, and the underreported groom version, but in some families, it’s the parents who are seized by irrational wedding meltdowns.

Last month, 60-year-old British florist and total mom-zilla, Carolyn Bourne attacked. After her stepson’s bride-to-be, Heidi Withers, was a guest in her house she had a thing or two to teach her before she entered the Bourne family.

So Bourne sent the 29-year-old a soul-crushing email. The subject line: “Your lack of manners.” The bullet points for the bride, in paraphrase: her wedding is going to be tacky, she’s too picky of an eater, her sense of humor sucks, and her stepson is making a dreadful choice in marrying her. And one more thing: her out-of-work parents are cheap.

When Withers received the email (Bourne sent it three times to be sure) she did what anyone would do: she forwarded it to a few friends to share in the shock. What was the alternative —respond with a 'frowny' face? But instead of simply offering advice, some anonymous friend got pro-active and forwarded Bourne’s e-attack, launching a viral sensation in a matter of hours. Now everyone in the Western Hemisphere has laid eyes on Bourne’s email.

In a way, it’s the ultimate revenge on a mother-in-law who needed to be put in her place after such power-mongering. But it’s not going to make for smooth wedding. Bourne has been labeled the mother-in-law from hell by media outlets and Withers’ father Alan has fueled the fire  by publicly calling Bourne “Miss fancy pants." Now parents on both sides of the couple are fueding and nobody's manners are in check. Suggestion for Heidi and Freddie, her groom: elope.

Bourne has told London's Telegraph she still plans to attend the wedding, but will maintain a "dignified silence." She may know about English etiquette but she’s clueless about the cardinal rule of the Internet: never send an email you don’t want the world to see.  You almost have to feel bad for the lady, mom-zilla or no. That is, until you read the actual email she sent Withers. Here’s an excerpt:

from: Carolyn Bourne 
to: heidi withers 
subject: your lack of manners

Here are a few examples of your lack of manners:

When you are a guest in another's house, you do not declare what you will and will not eat - unless you are positively allergic to something.

You do not remark that you do not have enough food.

You do not start before everyone else.

You do not take additional helpings without being invited to by your host.

When a guest in another's house, you do not lie in bed until late morning in households that rise early - you fall in line with house norms.

You should never ever insult the family you are about to join at any time and most definitely not in public. I gather you passed this off as a joke but the reaction in the pub was one of shock, not laughter.

You regularly draw attention to yourself. Perhaps you should ask yourself why. No one gets married in a castle unless they own it. It is brash, celebrity style behaviour.

I understand your parents are unable to contribute very much towards the cost of your wedding. (There is nothing wrong with that except that convention is such that one might presume they would have saved over the years for their daughters' marriages.)

If this is the case, it would be most ladylike and gracious to lower your sights and have a modest wedding as befits both your incomes.

One could be accused of thinking that Heidi Withers must be patting herself on the back for having caught a most eligible young man. I pity Freddie.

Ouch. There's no denying it's harsh, but if you've ever been in the line of fire in a wedding party, you know marriage anxieties strike darkness in the hearts of man. What do you think: Is this mom's email forgivable

TONY PARKER DATING 20 YEARS OLD FRENCH PAGEANT QUEEN



The San Antonio Spurs guard is reportedly dating 20-year-old Barbara Morel, the winner of France's 2010 Miss Nationale pageant. Parker divorced his wife, "Desperate Housewives" star Eva Longoria, in November after a three-year marriage.

Morel was the winner of the inaugural Miss Nationale pageant last December. The competition was created to challenge the more-established Miss France pageant, a French equivalent of Miss America.

Parker told a French newspaper last month that he thought the Spurs' title chances were over. He later backed off those comments when they created a firestorm in America. Before last week's draft, Parker was the subject of trade rumors but remains with the team that drafted him in 2001. The 29-year-old begins a new four-year, $50 million contract this season.

He and Longoria met in 2004 and were engaged two years later. She filed for divorce late last year after reportedly discovering hundreds of text messages he had sent to the wife of a Spurs teammate.

In addition to her pageant career, Morel studies trade and commerce in Saint-Lambesc, Bouches du Rhône.

MSNBC SUSPENS MARK HALPERIN FOR OBAMA REMARK



MSNBC has suspended political analyst and Time magazine writer Mark Halperin indefinitely over a remark he made about President Obama Thursday morning.
"Mark Halperin's comments this morning were completely inappropriate and unacceptable," said MSNBC spokesman Jeremy Gaines in a statement. "We apologize to the President, the White House and all of our viewers. We strive for a high level of discourse and comments like these have no place on our air."
Appearing on "Morning Joe" this morning, Halperin, senior political analyst at Time and MSNBC and co-author of the 2008 election opus "Game Change," sought to characterize the president's demeanor at a press briefing the previous day. You can watch the video below--though the term Halperin uses to characterize the president is vulgar, as the partial transcript after the jump will also show:
"Are we on the seven-second delay?" Halperin asked.
"We have it. We can use it. Go for it. Let's see what happens," co-anchor Joe Scarborough replied.
"I thought he was a dick yesterday," Halperin replied, sending the hosts into a brief moment of panic.
Halperin apologized later on in the show and issued his own mea culpa hours later via MSNBC.
"I completely agree with everything in MSNBC's statement about my remark," he said. "I believe that the step they are taking in response is totally appropriate. Again, I want to offer a heartfelt and profound apology to the President, to my MSNBC colleagues, and to the viewers. My remark was unacceptable, and I deeply regret it."
You can watch a clip of Halperin's apology here:
Halperin is the latest in a string of MSNBC suspensions this past year. Scarborough himself was suspended last November for violating the network's campaign contribution policy, as was Keith Olbermann, who left MSNBC several months later. More recently, Ed Schultz was suspended in May for calling pundit Laura Ingraham a "slut." And former MSNBC dayside host David Schuster also got a suspension in 2008 for complaining that Hillary Clinton had "pimped out" her daughter, Chelsea, on the presidential campaign trail.
UPDATE 12:30 pm: Time also has issued a statement reprimanding Halperin: "Mark Halperin's comments on air this morning were inappropriate and in no way reflective of TIME's views. We have issued a warning to him that such behavior is unacceptable."

BAD FOTO EMBARRASSES CHINESE OFFICIALS


One of the worst doctored photographs in Internet history? That's the emerging verdict on a clumsily altered photo of bureacrats in the sleepy county of Huili, in southwest China's Sichuan province. In an ill-fated PR stunt, the trio of area government officials are shown appearing to float over the surface of a road, casting nary a shadow in a bid to promote a local road construction project.

"The saga began on Monday when Huili's website published a picture showing, according to the accompanying story, three local officials inspecting a newly completed road construction project this month," the Guardian's Peter Walker reports.

Calls soon began flooding the county's offices, which quickly issued an apology and removed the image.

And like government bureaucrats the world over, Huili county officials were quick to blame the mix-up on journalists--or in this case, a photographer. "The explanation was almost as curious as the picture itself: as other photos showed, the three men did visit the road in question, but an unnamed photographer decided his original pictures were not suitably impressive and decided to stitch two together," Walker writes. You can see the undoctored photos below.

Huili county explanation posted to China's Weibo social networking site. (China Internet …

Still, other China watchers noted the Chinese officials were quick to apologize for the incident and embrace social media as they sought to undo the damage and explain what had happened.

"What also surprised me is the government response. Huili County set up a Sina Weibo account today, apologized and responded with what happened," China Internet Watch's Rocky Fu writes, referring to a popular Chinese Facebook-type social networking site.

So for all the furor surrounding the clumsy PR overture, it does at least appear that the Chinese government has mastered the first lesson in PR crisis management: Get out ahead of the problem, 'fess up and move on.

Esquire Mag Opens Obama Eligibility Lock Down

While reading at Birthers.org this morning, I found out that Esquire magazine may have, as the Birthers.org article states, "Opening the Back Door to the Obama Eligibility Lock Down." This would certainly be GREAT NEWS! Even if the usurper isn't kicked out of office immediately, just the exposure that this court case causes  may very well derail any chance of an Obamination second term!!

Hope The Birthers.org site doesn't mind that I present their post in its entirety here:

The Courts, Congress and for the most part the Mainstream Media have effectively closed the door to any serious legal challenges to Obama's lack of constitutional eligibility. That is about to change.




Unknowingly Esquire Magazine has opened the door to have the evidence of fraud presented in a federal court when they wrote in their satire disclaimer about their story about Joe Farah pulling Jerry Corsi's book off the shelves, “(a)re its author and publisher chastened? Well no. They double down, and accuse the President of the United States of perpetrating a fraud on the world by having released a forged birth certificate. Not because this claim is in any way based on reality, but to hold their terribly gullible audience captive to their lies, and to sell books. This is despicable, and deserves only ridicule.”




Joe Farah, Jerry Corsi and WND.com, now have the unique opportunity to present to the world the evidence that the document is in fact a fraud. And there is nothing Esquire or Obama can do to stop it. Since Obama will not be mentioned as a defendant, he has no cause to have his wonderful government lawyers intervene, in fact his personal lawyers can not do anything. The fact is Obama simply will be told what we have been told, he has no standing. Divine justice is not only just, it is sweet.




What can Esquire do? The only option they have is to settle out of court, but that requires all parties to agree and for some reason I do not think Joe is going to settle out of court for any price. Perhaps all those nasty things the left been saying about him are true, you know that he is (OMG) a Christian! And you all know the motto of those pesky Christians, “and the truth will set you free.” I think Joe will go for the truth instead of the money.




Joe will establish that he has reasonable doubt of the April 27, 2011 release of the so-called long form birth certificate and have those experts that he has published testify to this fact. Come to think of it, thanks to Esquire this action will give WND the right to get a federal court order for the original birth certificate on file with the Hawaii Department of Health to have it examined to substantiate their claim that the document produced on April 27th is in fact a forgery and that Esquire is intentionally lying about it to damage the reputations of Joe Farah, Jerry Corsi and WND.




Saul Alinsky said ridicule is the best weapon, and this is what Esquire Magazine tried to do to Farah, Corsi and WND, but it only works on those with no or little courage.




Esquire made a blunder with the initial article, and perhaps all Joe Farah had to sue them over is trying to restrict the sale of Jerry Corsi's book. Okay at best that might cost Esquire a couple of million, but then they screwed the proverbial pooch and said Joe was intentionally lying about the birth certificate being a fraud to scam the WND audience. This just cost the media their blackout on the facts, this is priceless.




Esquire, on behalf of all the Birthers nationwide all I can say to you is, THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!


Yes Esquire! Thank you for your blunder!!!



To see the National Press Club videos, go to World Net Daily:
CERTIFIGATE
Eligibility takes center stage at National Press Club
Even portions of 'establishment media' take note of heating dispute


Hat Tips to both links.

2010-2011: The Best Year Ever for Aggie Athletics?


October 16th, 2010 was a dark day for Texas A&M.  

It was a day I had planned for months.  I would finally be taking my entire family to their first Fightin’ Texas Aggie football game at Kyle Field.  They had been to a Spring Game before, but the electricity of the stadium at kickoff and the swaying of the 12th Man was something that they had to experience.  And I was overjoyed to finally be able to share my passion and for them to get a first hand glimpse of the school and tradition I hold so close to my heart.  

Like most of my plans and ideas, the day was a failure.  

The 11:30 AM kickoff (thanks Fox Sports) was bad enough.  Especially after my family’s first Midnight Yell.  But I had been so pumped up about this football game leading up to the weekend.  After two straight losses after a turnover prone contest to Oklahoma State in Stillwater (my first and hopefully my last visit to that terrible town) and a letdown at Jerry World once again to the pigs, I was ready for another victory and I was sure Mike Sherman and the boys would deliver.  They had been so close for the past two contests, just falling short by 3 and 7 points.  

30-9.  A Mizzou beatdown.  At home.  In Kyle Field.  

The game was a blur to me.  Around the middle of the 3rd quarter when I began to realize and accept that our fate was sealed for that day, my mind began racing.  3 straight losses with more sure to come at the hands of Oklahoma and Nebraska.  Would Coach Sherman survive?  Who could we hire as a new coach?  How long would we give the new guy before he ran out of excuses like Coach Sherman was running out of?  The team wasn't even competitive.  Kyle Field, the best place to experience college football in the entire country, was dead.  No energy.  No excitement.  Just blah.  

I was so disappointed that day to go home and explain to not only both my parents, (especially my father who had finally began to watch and like Aggie Football) buy my little sister as well who is a junior in high school with her own dreams and ambitions of coming to Texas A&M and studying vet medicine that the Kyle Field they had visited that day wasn’t the Kyle Field that I knew and loved.  The Aggie Football team they saw on the field wasn’t the same team I devoted long hours to watching practice and reading fan message boards.  The Texas A&M they experienced wasn’t what I knew.  

Something had to change.  And it did.  

With South Carolina winning over Florida in two games in the College World Series on Tuesday night, the 2010-2011 NCAA athletic calendar came to a close.  And the 2010-2011 year just might have been the best ever for Aggie Athletics. 


3 National Championships were brought back to Aggieland, one by Gary Blair and his women’s basketball team and the other two by Pat Henry and the men and women Outdoor Track and Field team (what else is new?).  And don’t forget Jeff Dadamo and Austin Krajicek who won the 2011 NCAA men’s tennis doubles championship, both track 4x400 teams captured the national crown, and track star Jessica Beard was nominated for the 2010-2011 Honda Sports award after winning the 400m and posting an NCAA best 49.14 in an anchor leg to capture the women’s national championship.  And for the non-“Equestrian isn’t a sport” crowd, the girls finished off their back-to-back-to-back national championship run as well to match the track team.  Did I leave any national champions out? 


Consider this.  In the 20 intercollegiate sports that Texas A&M Athletics competes in, 11 finished the year ranked in the national top 10 in their respective sport.  That’s simply amazing and pure dominance for Aggie Athletics.  (Thanks to @12thManTrue and 12th Man Magazine for that stat)

The Learfield Sports Director’s Cup is “A program that honors institutions maintaining a broad-based program, achieving success in many sports, both men's and women's.”  It takes a schools top 20 athletic programs and gives them points based on their season’s performance.  (A complete scoring structure and information can be found here: http://www.nacda.com/directorscup/nacda-directorscup-scoring.html) As of June 17th, Texas A&M Athletics ranked 8th out of all Division I programs.  Ahead of A&M is champion Stanford, Ohio State, Duke, Cal, Florida, North Carolina, and Oklahoma.  As of now, points for college baseball have not been added and A&M can move ahead as high as 6th place in the final standings.  Those are quality athletic programs with more diversity such as Lacrosse and Gymnastics included in their point totals.  A&M has to include ALL of its 20 programs to the point total.  Other programs like Stanford can choose their 20 best. A complete list and ranking of all Division I programs can be found here: http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/nacda/sports/directorscup/auto_pdf/d1june17.pdf

Something new added to the mix is the Capitol One Cup.  

The Capital One Cup is awarded annually to each of the top men's and women's Division I college athletics programs in the country. Points toward the Capital One Cup are earned and tracked throughout the year based on final standings of NCAA Division I Championships and final official coaches’ polls. One winning men’s and one winning women's program will be crowned after the completion of the final NCAA spring championships. Each winning athletic program will receive the Capital One Cup and $200,000 to fund student-athlete graduate-level scholarships. Winners will be presented at the annual ESPY awards.” 

Complete info can be found here: http://www.capitalonecup.com/about-the-cup.html
 
While you can agree or disagree with their scoring structure based on “tiers” of sports, increasing their overall point total based on popularity of that sport, (so football and volleyball will earn more points than say women's cross country) the Aggies had a great representation here as well.  Stanford, just like in the Director’s Cup, will be award 1st place on the Women’s side with 121 points at this year’s ESPYs.  Texas A&M women finished 2nd with 112 points.  The A&M men (and this is just hot off the presses) finished tied for 3rd overall with Auburn (what?) behind only champion Florida and Virginia.  The men were 23 points behind the Gators.  Only 3 athletic programs in the entire country had both their men and women in the Top 5: Stanford, Floirda, and Texas A&M.  That is quite an accomplishment.    Complete standings can be found here: http://www.capitalonecup.com/standings.html
 
I don’t know what will go down as my favorite memory of the 2010-2011 Aggie Athletic year.  Tyra White’s layup against Stanford in the final seconds at the Final Four?  Her three pointer to seal a national championship two nights later against Notre Dame?  (By the way, have you voted for Coach Blair’s team as the ESPY Team of the Year?  If no, do so here! http://espn.go.com/espys/#!/voting/) Jessica Beard and her 49.14 in the anchor leg of the women’s 4x400m to claim a third straight national championship? The dogpile at Florida State to send the Aggie Baseball team to their first trip to the College World Series in Omaha since 1999?  


Whatever happened to Coach Sherman and the football team you ask?  Well, the story goes something like this. Coach Sherman took all the Mizzou tapes and game plans from the week before to practice the next Tuesday and burned them right on the practice field for the football team to see the past and that 30-9 game was behind them.  He told the team there was a clean slate starting from that very moment for the players and coaches.  And some kid named Cyrus Gray walked into his office and told Coach Sherman he wanted the ball more and could help the team win.  Well, Cyrus Gray knocked off 6 straight 100 yard rushing games and Coach Sherman and the Aggies won every game in the regular season after that to finish 9-3 and capture a Cotton Bowl berth along with a share of the Big XII South Division crown.  (Yes they got rings to show for it).  



My favorite moment for 2010-2011 may have been 9-6.  I have never experienced a game and an atmosphere quite like the Nebraska game.  For so much hype to surround one game and for it to deliver from the fans to the players, it will be a night to truly remember and one that is talked about for some time.  That’s when I fell in love again with Kyle Field, the 12th Man, and Aggie Athletics.  That final War Hymn when both players, coaches, and fans that rushed the field alike sawed varsity horns off still echos in my ear and resonated throughout college athletics.  At that very moment deep down in my heart I realized that not only Aggie Football was back, but Texas A&M Athletics is here to stay.  

Still on the fence that 2010-2011 was the best in Aggie Athletic history?  Just take a look at these stats: 

Football – 19th Final Ranking, Big XII South Division Co-Champs, Cotton Bowl
Volleyball – 13-17 overall, 7-13 in Big XII
Men’s Basketball – 24th Final Ranking, #7 Seed in NCAA tournament
Women’s Basketball – National Champions
Men’s Golf – 5th Final Ranking, 3 PING All Americans
Men’s Swimming and Diving – 13th Overall Finish at NCAA’s
Men’s Tennis – 10th Final Ranking, Doubles National Championship
Track and Field – Outdoor National Champions, 4x400m National Champions, Women’s 400m National Champion
Women’s Golf – 7th at NCAA Championship
Soccer – 16th Final Ranking, #4 seed in NCAA tournament
Softball – 13th Final Ranking, #16 Overall Seed in NCAA tournament
Women’s Swimming and Diving – 7th Final Ranking
Women’s Tennis – 33rd Final Ranking
Baseball – 6th Final Ranking, Advanced to College World Series
Equestrian – National Champions

2010-2011 Big XII Championships:  Soccer Regular Season, Football Co-Big XII South Champions, Men’s Indoor Track and Field, Equestrian, Men’s Tennis Tournament, Men’s and Women’s Outdoor Track and Field, Baseball Regular Season Co-Champs, Baseball Tournament.  


Total: 9 Big XII Championships, or 30% of Big XII Total Championships.  

Rest of Big XII?
Texas: 5
Oklahoma: 2
Texas Tech: 1
Oklahoma State: 5
Baylor: 5
Nebraska: 4
Mizzou: 2
Kansas: 2
Kansas State: 0
Iowa State: 0
Colorado: 0
(Note: Numbers won’t add up to 30 due to co-champions in football and baseball)

Thanks for playing everyone.  See you again in 2011-2012.  Expect the same end results.  Aggie Athletic dominance.  

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Like what you have read?  You can expect stories and thoughts like these here on Midnight Yell in the future.  For up to date information:


Follow us on twitter:  http://twitter.com/#!/themidnightyell
 
 
Future Stories:  Be on the lookout for thoughts regarding 2011 Aggie Football Signee LeMarc Strahan not being able to make it to campus and the impact it will have on the 2011 Aggie Football season, as well as what South Carolina winning the College World Series means to college baseball:  could a blue print for championship teams be emerging?  And with Nebraska leaving the Big XII today, was two of the greatest games ever at Kyle Field involving the Cornhuskers in '98 and '10?  
 
 Thanks and Gig 'Em
-----Ranger222