Showing posts with label confusion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label confusion. Show all posts

Looking For Christian Reviews On This Essay!





When I read the title of the latest post over at Herescope: Restoring the Gospel of Salvation, I was excited to read it. The title of the article, however, was a bit different from the title of the post, which asks, "Does not the salvation of sinners trump national restoration?"



Without revealing my reaction after reading the editorial, I present it here - in its entirety - so that readers can write their own thoughts, comments, positive and/or critical reviews about what was written in the essay. I am especially interested in what other Christians think about the article, though all are invited to share their opinions as well. I plan to reveal my thoughts, comments and reactions to the post sometime over the next two days.

Happy reading! I encourage each Christian reading here to put on your apologetics hat and take some time to comment about what you have read!

In Christ,


Christine

*******


Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Restoring the Gospel of Salvation

Does not the salvation of sinners trump national restoration?




An Editorial by Rev. Dr. Orrel Steinkamp



There is a new virus going around. Its called Christian political war gaming. Once the virus strikes it becomes a near obsession. I know a number of people who don’t get enough sleep because they are at their computers doing political war games. Once they lived healthy Christian lives. Their passion was the Gospel of saving individual sinners. Now they rarely have the time or energy for their former passion. Their affections have been alienated. They need a Gospel intervention.

Former websites that defended the Gospel of salvation now are mostly devoted to restoring an illusive American past and proving our present president is a stealth Muslim attempting to make America a Muslim caliphate. Joseph Farah, World Net Daily Christian conspiracy expert, is sure Obama has specific plans for Christian concentration camps.

Even if all this is true, why should this divert us from our mandate of preaching the Gospel to every creature? Why should we be attempting to infiltrate and dominate every political entity before the time of God's vengeance?

Paul wasn't worried about imperial palace intrigue in Rome. Obama is just being a politician from the Left. Like all politicians before him he has an agenda. We do not have to accept these principles and we can vote our conscience and financially support the campaigns of our choice. In the current political stalemate this could qualify me as a liberal. Well! I didn’t vote for Obama and I didn’t vote for McCain. I was comfortable with making a write-in choice, one I know my every reader would support. I don't like Obama's stance on many things personally, and I deeply resent his reference to two fathers on fathers day. But neither did I appreciate "born-again" President Bush's statement to Muslim leaders that we both pray to the same God.

Nevertheless, Romans 13 states with clarity that God puts up rulers of His choice for His purposes. I may not agree with God's choice and can't always see His purpose, but I am commanded to pray for the rulers our Sovereign God raises up.

Is it for Christian evangelists to suffer near frenetic emotional exhaustion in the political war games arcade? Is the eternal purpose of God hanging on such a thin thread? Is the biblical Jehovah really such a wimp deity, and a weak onlooker to the affairs of men, hoping Christians will overcome politically and take back dominion our God supposedly lost in the Garden of Eden and a establish the kingdom of God in the earth?

America survived Clinton, Hoover, and a corrupt Ulysses Grant, and it will continue to survive if it is God’s will. My God is a sovereign who could overcome Egyptian Pharaohs (after Israel was in bondage for 300 years) and could even raise up Cyrus, a pagan ruler, to accommodate Israel’s return to Jerusalem. Paul never ever looked to Rome except to use his Roman citizenship for the furtherance of the Gospel.

How must we look to the persecuted church? Are we by example suggesting they become political terrorists for the Kingdom of God and unnecessary martyrs? Janet Porter, in her June 8, 2010 WorldNetDaily column, suggested that some of us were like the pious Germans who held high their hymnbooks so they wouldn’t see the cattle cars on their way to exterminate Jews. (A classic false dichotomy.) What could they have done? Lay themselves on the tracks? The German Christians were culpable, not because of their hymn singing but because they made common cause with the goals and destiny of the Third Reich, as did the Vatican in Rome.

Jesus, whom we say is our example, shunned (not a strong enough word) political pursuits in the name of the Kingdom of God. Recall the story of when Jesus was arrested in the garden of Gethsemane. Peter rushed to action and struck off the soldiers ear. Jesus was so perturbed that He instantly restored it and said to Peter "put your sward [sic] in its sheath" (John 18:11).

The Jerusalem that Jesus entered was a political hotbed. The people were involved in every possible action to drive out the pagan Romans from the holy city. When Jesus entered on Palm Sunday He purposefully fulfilled an Old Testament prophesy of the coming messiah by riding into the city on a young donkey. "Hosanna in the Highest" the crowd cried. Hosanna means “save us now." They treated Him as political messiah who would use his supernatural powers to drive out the Romans and RESTORE JERUSALEM. Did they look for a suffering savior who would bear the sins of the people? Hardly! By the time Jesus went to the cross they were all long gone.

Even the Romans saw Jesus as political threat. The quisling Jewish leaders, in collaboration with the Romans, were afraid of a political uprising. But the Messiah came for the redemption of sinners, not a political restoration of the Jewish State. It is safe to say the reason Jesus died nearly alone is because it was not "His Hour" to Judge the nations. It was only "His hour" to go to the cross. Why did He die nearly alone?

The Jews, and even His disciples, expected Jesus "to save now, hosanna." The Dominionists today are crying "hosanna now." They claim we can restore what Jesus failed to do in His first advent. But the resurrected Jesus had to tell His disciples that it was not for them to know the times and the season that the Father has fixed, by His own authority," to restore the Kingdom to Israel.

On the cross Jesus could have called 10,000 angels for His rescue. But this would have totally contravened the plan of redemption from sin decreed by God (not "decreed" by a fake apostle!) from the foundation of the world. Redemption from sin remains to this day the focus of the kingdom of God. Jerusalem was filled with zealots (we would call them undercover militia). They were called the sicarii (Latin for dagger), for they hid daggers in their robes to assassinate Romans and collaborators. Even the Essene community at the Dead Sea was calling for a final battle between the Sons of God (Israel) and the Sons of Darkness.

Into this political milieu Jesus never uttered a solitary political word. He made it plain that “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36). He, however, looked forward to when the Son of Man would RETURN and when He then would judge the nations. But until that great and awesome Day of the Lord, when the Savior would return on the clouds of glory, He was not striving for an earthly kingdom. He was content with establishing a church, His body upon the earth. Many in His day were offended by Him because He apparently had not political ambitions. Judas is speculated to be among them. Jesus asserted with force that His day to rule the nations awaited His second return, when He would judge the nations like a shepherd divides His sheep from the goats.

G. Peter Wagner, chief apostle of the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR), made a tactical decision to see Dominionism as temporarily consistent with democracy. I have not been able to locate when and where Wagner made such an "apostolic decree." But, indeed, the Kingdom of God cannot ultimately be a democracy. For Wagner and any other Dominionist, the democratic process can only be a way station on the road to their "kingdom of God on the earth," which is prior to the real Parousia.

Wagner's tactical decision (as opposed to strategic decision) was a major change. It opened the way for the false apostles and prophets to enter the political arena. So now "apostle" Lou Engle is free to lay apostolic hands of blessing on 3-time divorcee Newt Gingrich. Now the NAR apostles and prophets, thanks to Janet Porter and WorldNetDaily, can take their equal places in politics. Now they have the blessing of James Dobson, who endorsed Janet Porter’s May Day event at the Lincoln Memorial. Now Cindy Jacobs, prophetess extraordinaire, who had a visit of the Seraphim in her room that caught it on fire, can share the stage with Newt Gingrich. Now Rick Joyner, who has his own political action organization which he calls the Oak Initiative -- and who reportedly made a trip to heaven and heard Martin Luther repent of the Reformation -- can rub shoulders with James Dobson.

So now these self-anointed, self-appointed apostles of the NAR, laden down with false signs and wonders, false apostolic decrees, and false prophets -- who compete with each other in imaginary "can you top this" fraudulent oracles supposed to be from God -- have been given the kiss of acceptance by Christian Right politicians, including James Dobson. The apostles and prophets see this as a match made in heaven, a giant step toward appointing apostles as governors of every state and province in the world, complete with in-house prophetic seers to make supernatural decisions.

But I for one see it as blip in church history (like the Montanists of the 1st century), a match made in the pit of political desire for power before our King returns in His glory.

Obama's War on Truth [add-on]

Victor Davis Hanson truly nails it in his latest article. He covers it all - the truth about Obama's lies, Obama's misleading rhetoric, Obama's historical errors, Obama's flip flopping, his political and moral relativism, and the deception that he is inflicting upon America. The Lamestream Media of Mass Deception does not help because most commentators are "in the bag" with Obama - no matter how much damage he is doing to our nation. Most of the MSM refuse to call him out or into account for all of what is mentioned in the article.

Hanson's National Review Online article is titled: Just Make Stuff Up
President Obama’s war on the truth.


Added on 6/14/09:

The article begins:


In the first six months of the Obama administration, we have witnessed an assault on the truth of a magnitude not seen since the Nixon Watergate years. The prevarication is ironic given the Obama campaign’s accusations that the Bush years were not transparent and that Hillary Clinton, like her husband, was a chronic fabricator. Remember Obama’s own assertions that he was a “student of history” and that “words mean something. You can’t just make stuff up.”

Yet Obama’s war against veracity is multifaceted. [Continue reading article]


Obama's crimes make Watergate look pale in comparison! First of all - he is NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN AND INELIGIBLE TO BE POTUS! Thus far, it would appear that he is getting away with his crimes. However, I still hold onto the hope that the Kerchner et al vs. Obama et al lawsuit brought forth by Mario Apuzzo will finally reveal the truth about his eligibility. The truth usually always comes out - it's only a matter of time. We know that Obama is hiding something!***

One reason that my hope in this matter has increased is because I recently listened to an on demand broadcast of a great conversation between Mr. Apuzzo, Charles Kerchner (lead plaintiff) and Andrea Shea King on Blog Talk Radio. [Note: When you click on the link, look for "On Demand Episodes."


On Demand Episodes 4406 Original Air Date: 6/11/2009 6:00 PM

Atty. Mario Apuzzo - Charles Kerchner
Charles Kerchner, American citizen, and three other men, have filed suit in the US District Court, New Jersey, claiming Obama has violated the 1st, 5th, 9th, 10th and 20th Amendments of our Constitution. They are asking that Obama be declared under Article II to be ineligible to hold the office of President and Commander in Chief, and be removed. Tonight, attorney Mario Apuzzo and leaf plaintiff Charles Kerchner will explain the lawsuit -- Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al -- and the latest development.
Bottom line? Obama is not going to be able to hide the truth forever. I think that this lawsuit has the best chance of succeeding. The ObamaBorg has not been successful at getting this one so easily dismissed. There are many more defendants involved! Perhaps that may prove to be one of the keys of success in this lawsuit!

End of add-on.

*******

Excerpt [from second half of article]:

Quote:
Outright historical dissimulation. On matters of history, we now know that much of what President Obama says is either not factual or at least misleading. He predictably errs on the side of political correctness. During the campaign, there was his inaccurate account of his great-uncle’s role in liberating Auschwitz. In Berlin, he asserted that the world — rather than the American and British air forces — came together to pull off the Berlin Airlift.

In the Cairo speech, nearly every historical allusion was nonfactual or inexact: the fraudulent claims that Muslims were responsible for European, Chinese, and Hindu discoveries; the notion that a Christian Córdoba was an example of Islamic tolerance during the Inquisition; the politically correct canard that the Renaissance and Enlightenment were fueled by Arab learning; the idea that abolition and civil rights in the United States were accomplished without violence — as if 600,000 did not die in the Civil War, or entire swaths of Detroit, Gary, Newark, and Los Angeles did not go up in flames in the 1960s.

Here we see the omnipotent influence of Obama’s multicultural creed: Western civilization is unexceptional in comparison with other cultures, and history must be the story of an ecumenical, global shared brotherhood.

The half-, and less-than-half, truth. At other times, Obama throws out historical references that are deliberately incomplete. To placate critical hosts, he evokes the American dropping of the bomb. But he is silent about the impossible choices for the Allies — after Japanese atrocities in Manchuria, Korea, the Philippines, Iwo Jima, and Okinawa — facing the necessity of stopping a Japanese imperial killing machine, determined to fight to the death.

He lectures about equivalent culpability between Muslims and Americans without mentioning American largess to Egypt, Jordan, and the Palestinians. He mostly ignores American military efforts to save Muslims in Afghanistan, Bosnia, Kosovo, Kuwait, and Somalia — and American criticism of Russia’s and China’s treatment of their own persecuted Muslim minorities.

When Obama contextualizes the United States’ treatment of Muslims, does he do so in comparison to the Chinese treatment of the Uighurs, the Russians in Chechnya and Afghanistan, or the European colonial experience in North Africa?

When he cites European colonialism’s pernicious role in the Middle East, does he mention nearly 400 years of Ottoman Muslim colonial rule in the Arab-speaking world? Or the Muslim world’s own role in sending several million sub-Saharan Africans to the Middle East as slaves? By no stretch of the imagination is purported Western bias against Islam commensurate with the Islamic threats that have been issued to Danish cartoonists, British novelists, the pope, or German opera producers.

Obama surely knows that a mosque is acceptable in America and Europe in a way that a church is not in most of the Gulf States, or that Muslims freely voice their beliefs in Rotterdam and Dearborn in a way Westerners dare not in Tehran, Damascus, or Riyadh.

Here we see the classic notion of the “noble lie,” or the assumption that facts are to be cited or ignored in accordance with the intended aim: Interfaith reconciliation means downplaying Muslim excesses, or treating Islamic felonies as equivalent with Western misdemeanors.

Why has President Obama developed a general disregard for the truth, in a manner far beyond typical politicians who run one way and govern another, or hide failures and broadcast successes?

First, he has confidence that the media will not be censorious and will simply accept his fiction as fact. A satirist, after all, could not make up anything to match the obsequious journalists who bow to their president, proclaim him a god, and receive sexual-like tingles up their appendages.

Second, Obama is a postmodernist. He believes that all truth is relative, and that assertions gain or lose credibility depending on the race, class, and gender of the speaker. In Obama’s case, his misleading narrative is intended for higher purposes. Thus it is truthful in a way that accurate facts offered by someone of a different, more privileged class and race might not be.

Third, Obama talks more than almost any prior president, weighing in on issues from Stephen Colbert’s haircut, to Sean Hannity’s hostility, to the need to wash our hands. In Obama’s way of thinking, his receptive youthful audiences are proof of his righteousness and wisdom — and empower him to pontificate on matters he knows nothing about.

Finally, our president is a product of a multicultural education: Facts either cannot be ascertained or do not matter, given that the overriding concern is to promote an equality of result among various contending groups. That is best done by inflating the aspirations of those without power, and deflating the “dominant narratives” of those with it.

The problem in the next four years will be not just that the president of the United States serially does not tell the truth. Instead, the real crisis in our brave new relativist world will be that those who demonstrate that he is untruthful will themselves be accused of lying.

— NRO contributor Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. /quote

Hat Tip:

Victor Davis Hansen: National Review Online

*******

***Quote below from The Obama File: Latest Obamanations - Day 146
Obama's Admission


From "Dreams..." -- page 26, last paragraph:

"I discovered this article, folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms, when I was in high school. It's a short piece, with a photograph of him. No mention is made of my mother or me, and I'm left to wonder whether the omission was intentional on my father's part, in anticipation of his long departure. Perhaps the reporter failed to ask personal questions, intimidated by my father's imperious manner; or perhaps it was an editorial decision, not part of the simple story that they were looking for. I wonder, too, whether the omission caused a fight between my parents."

This paragraph exists in "Dreams from My Father." It is proof that Obama's birth certificate exists, that his grandmother had a copy, and that he's seen it. So he knows what's on it, and whatever it is -- or isn't -- it's the reason he is fighting its release so ferociously.

Undoubtedly, this knowledge provided the motivation for the ransacking of his grandmother Dunham's apartment within hours of her death. He was looking for this document before it fell into the "wrong" hands.

*******

More from "The Obama File":

This is not only bizarre (or, bizCzar) but also most likely UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!

Quote:


21 And Counting


Obama has appointed 21 "Czars."

These Czars are "Political Officers." In the old Soviet Union, they were called Commissars.

The Executive Branch of government is organized hierarchically, top-down, by Departments (Treasury, Defense, etc.). Each department functions under the direction of an executive, referred to as a "Secretary," who is confirmed by the Senate.

The appointments of these "Czars" changes the fundamental structure of the Executive Branch into a "matrix" structure. The czars have political power across all of the departments within the Executive Branch.

They speak for Obama and their function is to ensure compliance with Obama's policies within the Executive Branch.The American People don't know who most of these Czars are. They've had no background checks. There is no Congressional oversight over the Czars, unlike a Cabinet position. They are appointed by Obama and are extraordinarily powerful, simply because they take their direction from and report directly to Obama.

We don't know how much money they make. We don't know how many tax-payer dollars they oversee. We don't know how much power they wield.

Where are the checks and balances? /quote

What's Going On Behind the Curtain [Add-On]

A few people have come here to this blog claiming that I'm a "tin foil hat" conspiracy theorist regarding Obama's "election" despite the fact that he is not a Natural Born Citizen of the United States of America. So be it. I'll wear that hat.

Even some Christians have taken me to task for constantly writing about the subject. Many have given up on the issue - they think that nothing can be done about it now. Perhaps they are correct. But I see MANY, MANY patriots continuing to fight against this usurpation of our government.

Today, I read an article that some may also consider as an additional "conspiracy theory." However, with the craziness that is going on in our nation via the Obamination Admin, the absolutely traitorous congressional actions (against the will of the people that they are SUPPOSED TO BE REPRESENTING!), and the impotence of our judiciary system; a lot of what is written in the following article makes sense. In fact, it makes MUCH MORE SENSE than what our current Lamestream Media of Mass Deception is putting out in front of us on a daily basis.

Below is the link to the article. It is WELL WORTH THE READ [comments there are very insightful as well] and I recommend that EVERYONE READS IT if you really want to know what's going on behind the "curtain" of Obamanomics, the "swine" flu hysteria, as well as all of the other details contained within the article. It sheds some light upon the perplexing struggle between the New World Order Marxists vs. the Islamic "Sharia" plans for such an existence. You will readily see why Obama wants to throw Israel "under the bus."

Northeast Intelligence Network - Investigating Threats to Our Homeland: From Anthrax to Zawahiri, searching for answers

Also see RepubX's comments in red which are interspersed within a copy of the same article.

Hat Tips:

Northeast Intelligence Network

RepubX blog

P.S. Back in September, 2008 I did a post with a link to a video of Dr. David Jeremiah explaining "Modern Europe...Ancient Rome" from his book and series: What In the World Is Going On? Ten Prophetic Clues You Cannot Afford to Ignore. BTW, IT IS WELL WORTH IT TO VIEW THE ENTIRE SERIES AND READ THE BOOK!

From an end times biblical perspective, viewing this video may help you to further understand the following comments over at Northeast Intelligence Network:




Marcel
May 11th, 2009 at 1:54 pm
Thanks for the great insight.lets keep our eyes on the prize, the only real prize.
What an amazing time to be alive to see the fulfillment of so much of God’s prophetic word before out eyes.
As for the oddities of what we see transpiring in America today, it can be none other than the fulfillment of Genesis 12:3, I will curse those who curse you.
Looking at every aspect of this once great nation from the economy to foreign policy it is cursed.
Israel is the stumbling block to the plans of Satan and his followers and for sure God is setting the trap for all the nations as they will surely come to the mountains of Israel in a grand colaition of hte willing to become food for the birds.
What an incredible time to see the soon coming Kingdom which will never be broken, Jesus return to Jerusalem, the center of the earth.
The NWO mixture of clay (democracy) and iron (Islam) today will be short lived and doomed from the start (shorter than Bubba Billy’s 8 year rule and Herr Bush’s 8 year rule.)
All that hard work and only 3 1/2 years for these losers and their agenda before Jesus brings it all down.
Thank God we do not have to be the blind following the blind elites to the eternal hot house God has prepared for them.



Mijadedios
May 11th, 2009 at 11:17 pm
I agree. I think your piece is Excellent. I see all your points made and believe they are valid with one exception. The Lens of Scripture can fill in all the holes! First, Syria..Isiah 17 addresses this issue. Ezekiel 38 & 39 address the Russia, Iran, Horn of Africa, and China issue. Daniel 7 & Rev. 17 address the 10 kings that will be evident soon…and the one who is pulling all the strings, that’s Anti-Christ, the Anti-Christ and he’ll be revealed soon also. I think it’s brilliant how the Lord is using all the NWO Bilderbergs/Trilaterial Commission, UN, EU, etc… to reveal what we’ve always known in Scripture! It’s all coming together and to those who Know HIM, Jesus Christ, this should not in anyway shake us, but make us stronger and trust that Jesus Christ will come again and all what has been said from Genesis to Revelation will come to pass. We live in exciting times! Your post, and this site has been a brillant Light in an ever increasingly dark and evil place. May the Lord God of Heaven cover you with protection! Maranatha!


*******

Update:

Another great chapter and video in the series!

VIDEO: Islamic Terrorism in the series "What In The World Is Going On? Ten Prophetic Clues You Cannot Afford to Ignore (note: if pressed for time, fast forward to the message at @ 20:30)

*******
Update and Add on:

Be sure to read Citizen Wells ongoing series:

PART 1: Obama Manchurian Candidate, socialists, radicals, leftist ties, Acorn, Saul Alinsky, Democratic Socialists of America, New Party

Obama Manchurian Candidate, Communist ties, Soviets, Russians, Marxist, CPUSA, Communist Party of the United States of America, Hawaii CP network, Frank Marshall Davis, Raila Odinga, Communist front organizations

And, though it is not a part of the series, read this:

Norman Thomas, Socialist Party of America, Leading American socialist, Liberalism, Presidential Candidate, Democratic Party has adopted our platform

Obama Manchurian Candidate, Communist goals 1963, The Naked Communist, Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures, Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis

The fourth in the series will be posted next.

I found the commentary right before the article to be EXACTLY as I had also experienced in my childhood years!


I decided to provide this as Part 3 because of it’s historical significance and clarity of relativity to our current situation with the usurper Barack Obama.

I am part of the first wave of Baby Boomers and grew up in a time of keen awareness of the Soviet and communist threats. We had air raid drills in grade school and everyone watched motionless as reports of the Cuban Missile crisis were broadcast on TV. Daily we were made known that the communists planned on controlling the world with words from Nikita Kruschev that “We will bury you.” So the report below from the Congressional Record of 1963 has no surprises for me. However, it is a good reminder for me and a wake up call for younger generations. As, you read the statements below, I am certain they will resonate with you and you will instantly relate them to this now, four part series.


It puts the Kennedy assassination in a whole new light, too.

I can still recall how I felt when we learned at school on Friday, November 22, 1963that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated!! Even though I was just eight years old, that horribly shattering event was the 9/11 of that era. I remember walking home from school absolutely stunned that someone would murder the President of the United States of America.

I didn't feel safe when our school did the bomb shelter drills. An alarm would go off throughout the school. It was that shrill, air raid low-to-high crescendo type alarm - different from the usual "ding ding ding" of the fire alarm bell so that teachers could distinguish between the two drills. We would go down to the basement and huddle alongside the cold wall in that dark hallway, cringing in fright just thinking that if it had been a real emergency, bombs might be dropping all around us.

It was probably my first experience of how very dangerous the "real world" is.

When President Kennedy was shot and killed, I realized what kind of terrible evil men can inflict upon each other.

Forty-six years later, now born again in Christ with over 25 years of Bible study, the fear of the "real world" hasn't dissipated, but knowing that I am "not of this world" as Jesus said and knowing what I need to know to be confident in my salvation and relationship with Christ, helps me to see the past, present and future for what it truly is. At the culmination of history, Christ will return for His own. No matter what happens here on this earth, the future and eternity is in His mighty hands.

Meanwhile, I will watch, learn and work for "the time is near." I will go about my duties as a Christian - in the here and now - to fight for what is right; as both a patriotic American and follower of Jesus Christ. My utmost duty is to share the gospel of Jesus Christ with all who come to this blog.

Talk Wisdom Irks GreenEyedLilo & Co.

Received another comment from homosexual advocates. How does this blog get on their radar screen so often? My guess is that it is probably the same disgruntled homosexual person using various screen names.

The following is a copy of the post and some of the comments there. A blogger named "alcari" apparently took offense towards a former Talk Wisdom post entitled Their Own Consciences Testify.

Here we go! I have blotted out the curse words. Didn't want to subject my readers to a link to their LGBT CULT OF CONFUSION!

Christine

*******

Meh Fundie!

Italicized portion taken from my original blog post:

It is also "written on our hearts." In our heart of hearts, not matter what the homosexual agenda tries to push on us, WE KNOW that same-sex sexual behavior is a sin and an abomination to God. The fact that certain people refuse to recognize that fact does not change the truth. As Roman 2:15 informs us - their thoughts will either accuse or excuse them!

The gay christian movement is in the business of excusing themselves. They have chosen "to exchange the truth for a lie."

And, what's more, they will do ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to attempt to cover their sin and excuse themselves rather than what is truly needed - repentance! Why? Because whether one admits it or not, one's own conscience and God's Word accuses them.


ChristineWJC, Her "Talk Wisdom" blog [Comments (16)] [2008-Aug-30]

Submitted by GreenEyedLilo

Rat of Steel

#697502
2008-Aug-30 07:30 PM

"WE KNOW that same-sex sexual behavior is a sin and an abomination to God."

In the immortal words of the Lone Ranger's sidekick, Tonto:

"What do you mean 'WE', paleface?"


RavenWood

#697512
2008-Aug-30 07:36 PM

Sounds like Her "Talk Bulls**t."


Panz

#697519
2008-Aug-30 07:37 PM

We know?
Um, no, you don't, you THINK and BELIEVE according to cherry picking from your FAITH...

"And, what's more, they will do ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to attempt to cover their sin and excuse themselves rather than what is truly needed - repentance!"

Wait, isn't this like Christianity in a nutshell?


aaa

#697528
2008-Aug-30 07:42 PM

Whine...


Old Viking.

#697630
2008-Aug-30 08:21 PM

Couldn't you choose another abomination -- obstreperous children, non-virgin brides -- for a change of pace? Just for a while, mind you.


Xotan

#697633
2008-Aug-30 08:24 PM

The day Christians extend tolerance to others, and start minding their own business, and stop looking at what is going on in others' bedrooms, is the day they should be tolerated. Until then, they should be whacked three times on each ear morning, noon and night with a wet tea towel.

This cow is a steaming pile of barf and sick.




#697646
2008-Aug-30 08:36 PM

i really would like to know what the **** the gay "agenda" is, being accepted and treated as people with emotions? oh ok..


IanC

#697721
2008-Aug-30 09:45 PM

We?

Oh no. Not we. Just some


Fishcakes

#697746
2008-Aug-30 10:00 PM

In my heart of hearts, I know that there's absolutely NOTHING wrong with homosexuality, that love is love, and hell, we need MORE love in the world today, and who are we to say who others can and cannot love?



#697761
2008-Aug-30 10:11 PM

@Fishcakes: Right on.


GreenEyedLilo

#697788
2008-Aug-30 10:26 PM

@Old Viking: I wouldn't wish this nonsense on a non-virgin bride or any child.

She tries to make us sound like cats in the litterbox or something. But no "God" accuses me. It's God's little helpers, like Christine, who try to accuse me and other LGBTs, and the thing is, the "crime" isn't a bad thing at all. The "crime" is a just-fine thing that can sometimes be really good!



alex77

#697797
2008-Aug-30 10:31 PM

I still have hope (if he exists) that God is Love. Have a nice day. And please try to "Love thy neighbour" just once.


Jay-Sus

#697805
2008-Aug-30 10:39 PM

Talk Wisdom could not be more wrong.


Allegory for Jesus

#697830
2008-Aug-30 10:52 PM

"I feel it in gut that they are icky!" is not a very good argument. Just FYI.

"They have chosen "to exchange the truth for a lie." "

Oh...and you haven't? I assume that you couldn't have possibly done so, since you have "wisdom" in your blog title. You are obviously immune to such oversights, right?

"And, what's more, they will do ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to attempt to cover their sin and excuse themselves rather than what is truly needed"

Repent for being a woman NOW!! Do it! Yeah. Not exactly fun to be forced to repent for something that isn't your choice, and isn't morally wrong from your view, now is it?


ID82

#697837
2008-Aug-30 10:54 PM

What is this agenda that they speak of?


Reverend Jeremiah

#697966
2008-Aug-31 12:59 AM

Hey **** face.. a homosexuals conscience doesnt accuse them..all it does is think of hot, sweaty men folk.